Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Multihulls
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Most Recent Posts Gallery Images Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #76  
Old 03-03-2011, 05:58 AM
captainsideburn's Avatar
captainsideburn captainsideburn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 23 Posts: 86
Location: Tasmania
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstgean View Post
What cat is that? For camp cruising I am in total agreement. For longer duration or bad weather, I favor a spot to get dry and relax without the tentbound feeling--difficult on small boats in general and multihulls in particular.

Dan
The cat is an Attunga, a late 1950s design. It was built in 1962. I had a rather catastrophic capsize 18 months ago, so I'm slowly rebuilding

I fully agree, a nice dry spot is good, I just feel its not worth the sacrifices on a multihull smaller than maybe the above mentioned buccaneer. Unless you really are going to use a cabin everytime you go sailing, the resultant cramped cockpit is just not to my liking
Reply With Quote


  #77  
Old 03-03-2011, 10:31 AM
dstgean dstgean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rep: 68 Posts: 142
Location: Chicago Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by captainsideburn View Post
The cat is an Attunga, a late 1950s design. It was built in 1962. I had a rather catastrophic capsize 18 months ago, so I'm slowly rebuilding

I fully agree, a nice dry spot is good, I just feel its not worth the sacrifices on a multihull smaller than maybe the above mentioned buccaneer. Unless you really are going to use a cabin everytime you go sailing, the resultant cramped cockpit is just not to my liking
I'm in agreement there as well. I'm a bigger guy with a really long torso, so most of the seats in boats don't work for me with headroom--cars too for that matter. Longer boats accomodate cabins without looking too bulky. Interestingly some of the microcruisers have gone away from having a cockpit at all. For cruising in the long term--say longer than a week, I think a cabin is a REALLY nice feature. Some folks can deal with the exposure better than others I guess, but for beachcruising I like the open boat. For cruising, I'd prefer a cabin even if it means a longer boat to care for, pay for moorage, etc. One *could* add length only rather than volume, but that seems to be a temptation no one can resist.

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 03-03-2011, 11:04 AM
rayaldridge's Avatar
rayaldridge rayaldridge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Rep: 322 Posts: 581
Location: USA
I think it's true that in really small boats, you just have to choose between a cockpit and a cabin-- if you try to have both, neither will be very good.

On another forum, someone posted a link to a page about the folks who have crossed the Atlantic on beach cats. It makes for fairly horrifying reading-- skin rotting off the feet of the first to do it, lengthy hospital stays after only a couple of weeks of voyaging, and so forth. I think it's the nature of the voyage rather than its duration, since people backpack for months at a time. If you can occasionally get warm and dry, then you can cruise in a camp cruiser like Slider. Ida Little and Mike Walsh camped for months in the Bahamas, with a Hobie 14 and a canoe. But they made camps ashore-- they didn't live aboard.

__________________
Ray

http://slidercat.com/blog/wordpress

Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 03-03-2011, 12:23 PM
Brorsan Brorsan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 43 Posts: 77
Location: Gothenburg/Sweden
Oh, another question, why is not the building method of tortured ply used nowdays in small multis? I kow it is harder to make drawings for it, but is that the only reason?
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 03-04-2011, 03:43 AM
captainsideburn's Avatar
captainsideburn captainsideburn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 23 Posts: 86
Location: Tasmania
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brorsan View Post
Oh, another question, why is not the building method of tortured ply used nowdays in small multis? I kow it is harder to make drawings for it, but is that the only reason?
+1 i've often wodered this
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 03-04-2011, 04:21 AM
jamez jamez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 228 Posts: 374
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by captainsideburn View Post
+1 i've often wodered this

If you are talking fold-up It might be that difficulties with shape control, limitations in available hull shapes and difficulties in torturing ply thicker than 5-6mm count against it. Also once you have a boat shape ( in any other than the very smallest hulls) you have to spend time putting in frames, stringers or other internal reinforcement, bulkheads etc.

That said Kurt Hughes CM boats are a variant of tortured ply and hull shape was pretty consistent in 100s of Tornados built that way.

Assuming we're talking bigger than 20' There are designs out there but you would be hard pressed to find a full set of plans for some of them.

Examples with plans ( and I have no idea how comprehensive these are)

http://www.tcdesign.co.nz/bt_790racing.htm

http://www.tennantdesign.co.nz/index.php?page=red-shift

The JT 8.5s (pic below), built from 4mm ply, have turned out competitive race boats in the 8.5 class here (2 sailing) and good solid boats too. There are no plans as such but information might be available to loft the panels and fold up the hulls. Probably not a good choice for a first project . It really is seat of the pants stuff. IMO Anyone contemplating building a sizeable boat this way should at least read Gougeons chapter on the subject, watch Kurt Hughes CM DVD and probably talk to someone whose built one.
Attached Thumbnails
Scarab 16-jt-8.5.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 03-04-2011, 04:46 AM
luckystrike's Avatar
luckystrike luckystrike is offline
Power Kraut
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rep: 92 Posts: 197
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brorsan View Post
Oh, another question, why is not the building method of tortured ply used nowdays in small multis? I kow it is harder to make drawings for it, but is that the only reason?
Tortured Ply (TP) is a real magical building method and suitable for the amas if they have a v-shaped bottom. The amas of my 30 footer tri are done this way. But I designed them in the "Nigel Irens Style" of the 1990ths, having a boat designed for good overall speed and seaworthiness, but not for absolute top speeds.

The Mainhulls of today are to much U-shaped or trapezoid in the bottoms to be compatible with TP. For TP the hull has to be long and slim (10:1 or better)

The problem with TP today is, that you can design them with the help of computers, but you can not be 100% sure that the ply is managing the bend or breaks during the foldup. In the yellow "West Systems" book the design process is supported by scaled modelling, and so did I. Nevertheless I had a real nervous time building my amas but it worked out for me.

Kurt Hughes has a further develloped TP building method called Cylinder Molding and the most radical TP design of today is the "Blade" F16 race cat.

For most people it is not tolerable to have a building method that maybe will fail during the built or to have tolerances in the measures of the boat compared to the drawings.

Best Regards, Michel
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 03-04-2011, 04:40 PM
captainsideburn's Avatar
captainsideburn captainsideburn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 23 Posts: 86
Location: Tasmania
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckystrike View Post
Tortured Ply (TP) is a real magical building method and suitable for the amas if they have a v-shaped bottom. The amas of my 30 footer tri are done this way. But I designed them in the "Nigel Irens Style" of the 1990ths, having a boat designed for good overall speed and seaworthiness, but not for absolute top speeds.

The Mainhulls of today are to much U-shaped or trapezoid in the bottoms to be compatible with TP. For TP the hull has to be long and slim (10:1 or better)

The problem with TP today is, that you can design them with the help of computers, but you can not be 100% sure that the ply is managing the bend or breaks during the foldup. In the yellow "West Systems" book the design process is supported by scaled modelling, and so did I. Nevertheless I had a real nervous time building my amas but it worked out for me.

Kurt Hughes has a further develloped TP building method called Cylinder Molding and the most radical TP design of today is the "Blade" F16 race cat.

For most people it is not tolerable to have a building method that maybe will fail during the built or to have tolerances in the measures of the boat compared to the drawings.

Best Regards, Michel
Thats what I'm talking about, if you can do it with a small cat like a blade, far tighter curves etc, why not something bigger, the curves would of course be slacker and easier. I'm convinced its not that it can't be done, but that its more difficult to have consistency.
Both the blade and Gary's Alternative to marvelous Buccaneer 24 show that it can be done. And as Jamez's example shows it can be thin ply, so keeping it nice and light. I guess its the consistency and that composite has so much more control over all aspects of the shape, that drives designers to use that more.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 03-05-2011, 01:16 PM
jamez jamez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 228 Posts: 374
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
There is a great sequence of CM construction pics here for a Hughes 30 cat.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jdory/s...7625973914417/
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 03-05-2011, 03:26 PM
Brorsan Brorsan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 43 Posts: 77
Location: Gothenburg/Sweden
Jamez, what a nightmare! having your boat smashed and partly sunk one month after launch, uurg.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 03-05-2011, 06:46 PM
jamez jamez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 228 Posts: 374
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Yes, to be honest I'm surprised it wasn't completely demolished. That barge was huge.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 03-05-2011, 07:06 PM
jamez jamez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 228 Posts: 374
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by captainsideburn View Post
Thats what I'm talking about, if you can do it with a small cat like a blade, far tighter curves etc, why not something bigger, the curves would of course be slacker and easier. I'm convinced its not that it can't be done, but that its more difficult to have consistency.
Both the blade and Gary's Alternative to marvelous Buccaneer 24 show that it can be done. And as Jamez's example shows it can be thin ply, so keeping it nice and light. I guess its the consistency and that composite has so much more control over all aspects of the shape, that drives designers to use that more.
Apologies for continuing the thread drift Some vid of the other JT8.5; you can get a good idea of the hull shape that was achieved.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKzoY...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 03-06-2011, 03:05 AM
captainsideburn's Avatar
captainsideburn captainsideburn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 23 Posts: 86
Location: Tasmania
jamez, thats sweet, who designed it?
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 03-07-2011, 02:23 PM
jamez jamez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 228 Posts: 374
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Its designed by John Tetzlaff, who also recently launched his new 8.5 tri (designed with input from Tim Clissold) that Samnz's new boat and Lucifer have evolved from (hope I haven't left anybodyout ). Pics are of Johns boat with cedar strip and ply main hull, tortured ply floats, ply/carbon beams. Also Sams boat currently being built, uses more foam, less ply.
Attached Thumbnails
Scarab 16-jt-tri-2.jpg  Scarab 16-jt-tri-008.jpg  Scarab 16-gdt2.jpg  

Reply With Quote


  #90  
Old 03-07-2011, 03:51 PM
Brorsan Brorsan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 43 Posts: 77
Location: Gothenburg/Sweden
Very "clean" look on that tri Jamez, is it allowed to call a multihul beautiful? Nah, that is to strong word, good looking is better suited. (:
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More Scarab Pics Marvout Multihulls 0 09-22-2010 09:57 PM
Scarab 9 tri opinions gambolputty Multihulls 1 06-09-2010 05:05 AM
1989 21 ft scarab excell toolsinbox Marketplace 0 01-28-2010 02:34 PM
A question about a scarab....... wayne74447 Powerboats 0 03-22-2007 08:00 PM
Scarab restoration Top Knot Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 2 01-06-2006 03:02 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2014 Boat Design Net