Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Multihulls
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-17-2009, 10:41 PM
Elmo Elmo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rep: 170 Posts: 32
Location: Beach
New 50 ft tri

http://www.neel-trimarans.com/technique-en.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-19-2009, 01:13 PM
Tad's Avatar
Tad Tad is offline
Yacht Designer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rep: 2006 Posts: 1,638
Location: Gabriola Island, B.C. Canada
Huge credit for re-thinking the cruising tri concept.......but!!

That is one huge weird ass boat!

High performance sailing (cruising) where you stand out on the wing deck....no seat, no protection.....halyards (and sheets?) inside???.......horrible cockpit where you can't see anything with uncomfortable little benches......and those gray hobbit holes to sleep in?

No thanks....huge possibilities though with a new arrangement including a raised (and covered) central cockpit...a big one!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:21 PM
RHP's Avatar
RHP RHP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 1073 Posts: 568
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Interesting but what is the advantage of that boat over a modern catamaran?

Externally it looks like a generic catamaran with an added centre hull.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:50 PM
basildog basildog is offline
basildog
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 10 Posts: 48
Location: Gold Coast Australia
This is just plain wrong - sailing along with 3 hulls in the water - no cockpit - water slamming up the wings - and so it goes on.
As someone just said why not a catamaran
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2009, 07:15 PM
glasssurfer glasssurfer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 26
Location: qudara island
that thing is still pretty damn sweet, ive never seen anything like that. im tall, is there enough headroom for a guy whos 6"3???

sweet boat tho, bet it goes pretty fast.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-19-2009, 09:52 PM
Landlubber's Avatar
Landlubber Landlubber is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 1491 Posts: 2,449
Location: Brisbane
I am sure the novelty of steering the bastard will wear off pretty quick, imagine standing there all day......wot me worry?
__________________
"I do not know, what I do not know!"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2009, 04:26 PM
Elmo Elmo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rep: 170 Posts: 32
Location: Beach
Excellent guys !

Thank you for the input.

I don`t think there was a single comment put here that could be disputed.

I posted this because it was different.

I still don`t understand the HUGE volume of those amas.

Cost aside , I could never see myself owning one.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-20-2009, 05:18 PM
Chris Ostlind Chris Ostlind is offline
.
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Rep: 593 Posts: 2,054
Location: South Bay
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmo View Post

I still don't understand the HUGE volume of those amas.

Because the boat has a fairly large weight issue that needs to be supported in a wide variety of potential conditions.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-20-2009, 05:42 PM
boat fan's Avatar
boat fan boat fan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Rep: 357 Posts: 679
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Ostlind View Post
Because the boat has a fairly large weight issue that needs to be supported in a wide variety of potential conditions.
That boat does look heavy Chris ....but......overkill it seems .... the amas look as if they have more volume than the center hull.....?
__________________
How big a reproduction are you thinking and do you have crew and money dripping off your butt?( PAR2009)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-20-2009, 05:50 PM
Elmo Elmo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rep: 170 Posts: 32
Location: Beach
Quote:
the amas look as if they have more volume than the center hull.....?

I agree ...is this really necessary ?
I would think with amas of that volume , a cat would be more sensible.
No ?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-21-2009, 03:40 PM
Sinclair D-R Sinclair D-R is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rep: 32 Posts: 16
Location: Nicaragua
Neel 50

Good day to all,

This tri,
Designed by famous NA: Michel Joubert and Bernard Nivelt with Eric Bruneel' racing experience and palmares
http://www.neel-trimarans.com/eric-bruneel-en.html
should be given the benefit of the doubt,
to say the least.
__________________
Safe winds.
Sinclair
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-21-2009, 06:16 PM
RHP's Avatar
RHP RHP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 1073 Posts: 568
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
I agree thats some pedigree but it depends on the design brief surely.

The boat we see is the result of a commission which I dont quite understand.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-22-2009, 06:17 PM
Fanie's Avatar
Fanie Fanie is offline
Fanie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 1930 Posts: 4,195
Location: Safrica
My take on this one -

I like large ama's, I dislike when they drown.

Just two things -

The cabin could have been shortened and they could have made the aft deck larger, extend deck to the rear of the ama's and center hull..

If the cabin was widened the ama's may be used for berthing if accessable form the cabin, yes, similar to a cat.


I doubt it's going to very fast, but it would be a nice stable cruiser.

A cat sits on two hulls at a time, a tri sit on the center hull and gets supported by it's ama's.
In this case it looks like they wanted both ama's to support simultanuously, the width shoud make it fairly stable.
__________________
Regards
Fanie

Water ! Just gimme water !
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-22-2009, 07:23 PM
DaveJ DaveJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Rep: 66 Posts: 131
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by RHP View Post
I agree thats some pedigree but it depends on the design brief surely.

The boat we see is the result of a commission which I dont quite understand.
I'm with you there, the uneducated guess i can come up with is that with all that beoyancy out on the ama's this boat reefing rating is going to be alot higher. But what gets me is it has no traveller and no boom vang. How are they going to control the sail shape in anything other than closed hauled. Afterall thats the big advantage for a multihull, keeping a proper sail shape off the wind.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-23-2009, 12:42 AM
ThomD ThomD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 98 Posts: 368
Location: TO
The website answers a lot of the questions posed.

- The amas are designed for light immersion in normal use, not to be a three hull cat. Photos do show windward hull clearance with the water.

- The boat can largely be handled/sailed ? from inside. i don't see an inside helm though maybe there is an auto pilot.

- They really wanted a different layout, what they refer to as a loft. 650 sq feet on one level

- They have good head room even in the mechanical storage area.

- They expect high sailing performance, with 300 mile days.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help with an old Tri kim s Multihulls 24 08-29-2009 02:35 PM
7m tri beams bushsailor Multihulls 21 03-03-2009 05:29 PM
Recycled Tri? rustysunner Multihulls 18 01-29-2009 07:14 PM
Tri-ing? Yes very! Dodgey_rog Multihulls 34 11-06-2006 12:48 AM
Tri performace MMulti Multihulls 15 09-02-2006 06:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net