Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Multihulls
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-24-2009, 04:09 PM
boat fan's Avatar
boat fan boat fan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Rep: 357 Posts: 681
Location: Australia
Quote:
They expect high sailing performance, with 300 mile days.
Sounds optimistic.

Quote:
But what gets me is it has no traveller and no boom vang.
I would not find that arrangement acceptable.
__________________
How big a reproduction are you thinking and do you have crew and money dripping off your butt?( PAR2009)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-27-2009, 01:14 PM
old-sid old-sid is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: UK
An older example of bridgedeck tri

Hi All,

This is my first post

Please find pictures of a 1997 dutch designed bridgedeck cruising tri, approx 50ftx27ft weight 8.5 tons contructed in foam and resin.

The side hulls are accessible through the bridgedeck by stairs, and contain a single 'owner' cabin which can be made into double bunks. The rear contains two double beds.
Attached Thumbnails
New 50 ft tri-pic1.jpg  New 50 ft tri-pic2.jpg  New 50 ft tri-pic3.jpg  

New 50 ft tri-pic4.jpg  New 50 ft tri-layout.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-28-2009, 04:04 PM
RHP's Avatar
RHP RHP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 1073 Posts: 569
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Bah-gum its got more accomodation than the QE2 !!

Not being critical for the sake of it as I believe he looks better than the other tri, but why does anyone need 10 berths on a 50' trimaran?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-28-2009, 05:09 PM
Landlubber's Avatar
Landlubber Landlubber is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 1506 Posts: 2,456
Location: Brisbane
hey RHP, stop asking sensible questions mate or you will be banned.......
__________________
"I do not know, what I do not know!"
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-28-2009, 05:13 PM
old-sid old-sid is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: UK
Hi RHP,

The reason for the number of berth's, is that the vessel was designed and used for chartering for 5 years+ at about 500 Euro's per berth per week.

The two rear side hull berth's have been removed, and are used for sail and anchor stowage.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-28-2009, 05:31 PM
Fanie's Avatar
Fanie Fanie is offline
Fanie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 2057 Posts: 4,291
Location: Safrica
Bah-gum - pity about the two berths removed. If you saw Manie's intended crew you'd make that thing like a bus
__________________
Regards
Fanie

Water ! Just gimme water !
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-28-2009, 05:50 PM
old-sid old-sid is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: UK
No problems there either, as I guess our larger American friends would be able to fit into the rear double berths

http://www.impactlab.com/wp-content/...r_1532425c.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:11 AM
RHP's Avatar
RHP RHP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 1073 Posts: 569
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landlubber View Post
hey RHP, stop asking sensible questions mate or you will be banned.......
Sorry mate it kinda popped out whilst I was sober. Wont happen again.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-29-2009, 05:42 PM
Landlubber's Avatar
Landlubber Landlubber is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 1506 Posts: 2,456
Location: Brisbane
OK, this time you are excused, just don't let it happen again, Cheers.
__________________
"I do not know, what I do not know!"
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:49 PM
Steve W Steve W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rep: 360 Posts: 686
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
I dont mind the boat,like the Lagoon the ugly cabin will yield a very nice interior but jeez,they went to great lengths to come up with about the most unappealing cockpit possible.My guess is the large amas are to keep the heeling to a comfortable angle,a lot of modern high performance tris heel way too much to be comfortable cruisers. A lot of the old Cross and Horstman tris of this size had really nice cockpits with enclosed helm and outside areas.
Steve.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-30-2009, 12:35 AM
Luckless Luckless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 105 Posts: 163
Location: PEI, Canada
Honestly this Neel 50 looks like someone designed a super small apartment, and then stuck it on a boat. It really looks uncomfortable to actually work, and I worry about the structural aspects of those front windows.

What is so bad about well made port holes?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-30-2009, 11:50 AM
RHP's Avatar
RHP RHP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 1073 Posts: 569
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckless View Post
What is so bad about well made port holes?
Tomato plants need lots of light.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-30-2009, 12:39 PM
Chris Ostlind Chris Ostlind is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Location: South Bay
Quote:
Originally Posted by RHP View Post

Tomato plants need lots of light.

Silver People on the Shoreline Let Us Be

This could be the opening comment for a future Apocalyptri conversation, with the Neel serving as a prototype for oceanic survivalist concepts. After seeing Avatar in 3D on an IMAX screen last week, I'm pretty much ready for any "out there" suggestion for a dialogue.

Sidebar: If you guys haven't already seen that movie, do so... and see it, if at all possible, in its full 3D glory in an IMAX theater. As a filmmaker, myself, I'm floored by James Cameron's vision realized... even if he is the screaming ******** of the century in person.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-30-2009, 06:18 PM
oldsailor7 oldsailor7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Rep: 269 Posts: 1,118
Location: Sydney Australia
I'm sorry, But to me that "Thing" is nothing but a streamlined ,or "Curvy", version of an early 1960's, first generation, "Roomeran", with all of the same disadvantages.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-01-2010, 12:12 PM
old-sid old-sid is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: UK
Personally I prefer Trimarans over Catamarans, and feel it is about time for the catamaran bridgedeck layout to be more widely adopted in modern Trimarans designs. The majority of modern Trimarans seem to be built as modified racers, or trailable weekend cruisers having not gained commercial success compared to the roomy bridgedeck catamarans.

My biggest concern with cruisers using the Catamaran design, is seeing what happens after strong winds in that many moored cruisers end up vertical floating on one hull only (see a picture of a recent near miss).

A modern bridge deck trimaran should not be confused with the old roomerans, as modern trimaran designs are constructed with strong lightweight materials. Having a wide beam L/B ratio, with differing hull shapes between the main hull and the amas’s. The ama’s designed for having buoyancy fore, having curved hull shapes with no hard chines. The brigedeck trimaran is still a true modern tri, capable of flying a hull, and making fast and comfortable journeys.
Attached Thumbnails
New 50 ft tri-cat.jpg  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help with an old Tri kim s Multihulls 24 08-29-2009 01:35 PM
7m tri beams bushsailor Multihulls 21 03-03-2009 04:29 PM
Recycled Tri? rustysunner Multihulls 18 01-29-2009 06:14 PM
Tri-ing? Yes very! Dodgey_rog Multihulls 34 11-05-2006 11:48 PM
Tri performace MMulti Multihulls 15 09-02-2006 05:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net