Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Multihulls
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2012, 05:37 PM
eiasu eiasu is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Rep: 10 Posts: 61
Location: novutopia, Germany
Displacemente Pahi 63: how is this possible?

I read
on the Wharram website Pahi 63 :
Weight 8 tons
Loading Capacity 4,5 tons
Draft 0,9 - 1,5 m

And on their websites:

Chris White Atlantic 57
Displacement 26,500lbs (12 ton)

Gunboat 60
Displacement Lightship16,200 kg 35,715 lbs Displacement Max Load19,000 kg 41,887 lbs

How is possible that the Pahi is so light? Built with Ply wood and Epoxy and the other two use much more expensive, sophisticated and light materials?
Can't understand !!!
Must be something missing ...
ciao
eiasu
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2012, 06:28 PM
Corley's Avatar
Corley Corley is online now
epoxy coated
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rep: 619 Posts: 1,593
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Theres lies, damn lies and boat weights they all fit into the same category. I'd want to have the boat craned out or weighed on a load cell before I believed a word of it. Also in what state? Lightship and whats defined by lightship varies from designer to designer some even weigh without essentials. Now there is an argument due to the lack of bridgedeck structure you save some weight but that much? I dont think so.
__________________
Multihull Yacht Club of Victoria
http://mycv-news.blogspot.com.au
blog/projects http://trimaranproject.blogspot.com.au/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2012, 07:06 PM
Angélique's Avatar
Angélique Angélique is offline
aka Angel (only by name)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rep: 1194 Posts: 722
Location: Belgium
Pahi 63 plans call as standard for 2 outboards. (2 x 9.9 Hp high trust ?)

The Atlantic 57 has 2 inboard diesels with saildrives. (2 x 55 Hp Volvo's)

There you might have what, a ton ? *
  • Edit: Likely to be more than a ton, taking into account the starting batteries, engine controls and the 757 L diesel tankage for the bigger engines of the Atlantic. -- The Pahi standard starts with a pull rope and is likely to carry less fuel.
Eiasu: ‘‘Chris White Atlantic 57 Displacement 26,500lbs (12 ton)’’

12 tons what? Empty or Lightship or Max Displacement ?

If it's Max Displacement then that's ½ a ton lighter than the Pahi 63.

Cheers,
Angel

P.S.

Gunboat 60: Motors + Gensets + Solar System + Battery Bank + Some Equipment
Quote:
18KW Electric Propulsion Motors with regeneration (x2) 1KW Solar System mounted on pilothouse 23KWH Lithium Ion Battery Bank Push button hydraulic centerboards and mainsheet Lewmar Electric Winches (x2) Emotion 22 KW 144 DC Generators (x2) SeaRecovery 24V AquaWhisper 600 GPD, watermaker with fresh water flush Arctic Air 144V Aircon Vertifrigo refrigerator drawers (x2) Vertifrigo freezer drawer (x2) Four burner Bosch Ceramic stove top with induction oven and Bosch microwave Iridium Phone Dual Auto-Pilots B&G Hercules H3000 Performance Package B&G Zeus Displays showing radar, charts, and sailing info x3 EMM display and CZone electrical display Marine audio system with Ipod connector, TV Screen, amplifier & speaker system with subwoofer in the salon, aft cockpit speakers Pure Yachting Carbon RIB Tender
Only thing the Pahi 63 has for that in the plans is 2 outboards, so goes for everything on board . . . .

Defferent boats, different weights....

Last edited by Angélique : 06-07-2012 at 02:18 PM. Reason: added gray Edit line
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2012, 10:15 PM
cavalier mk2 cavalier mk2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 148 Posts: 1,298
Location: Pacific NW North America
And different interiors, the Pahi 63 is flexi space meaning there is nothing there but compartments with footwells. This eliminates the cabinetry weight. Owners are supposed to furnish with hangings, galley boxes etc....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2012, 12:49 AM
MikeJohns MikeJohns is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1938 Posts: 2,688
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corley View Post
Theres lies, damn lies and boat weights they all fit into the same category. I'd want to have the boat craned out or weighed on a load cell before I believed a word of it. Also in what state? Lightship and whats defined by lightship varies from designer to designer some even weigh without essentials. Now there is an argument due to the lack of bridgedeck structure you save some weight but that much? I dont think so.
Weighing works for small boats but becomes rapidly very expensive then on to impossible as the size goes up. Also never believe the travel lift weight indication they are often out by anything up to 30% and usually well over what the boat weighs.

Just check your measurements against the plans then if you have a 3D CAD model the displacement is really easy and accurate from measuring for and aft waterline to deck edge. With ships and larger boats sans plans we take the lines off the boat to find the displacement. It's just as accurate.
__________________
Mike Johns.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2012, 01:10 AM
sabahcat's Avatar
sabahcat sabahcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 273 Posts: 793
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by eiasu View Post
I read
on the Wharram website Pahi 63 :
Weight 8 tons
Loading Capacity 4,5 tons
Draft 0,9 - 1,5 m
You do realise weight and displacement are two different things?

I read it as the boat weighs 8t
Has a displacement of 12.5t
allowing it to carry 4.5t

It will have a different displacement in fresh water vs salt and a different one again if in a sea of mercury
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2012, 01:19 AM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1159 Posts: 2,215
Location: Thailand
Many catamaran designers give very optimistic numbers for weight to keep the design attractive. Say, there would be weight without structural overweight margin, no genset, no teak, no air-conditioning system, no liferaft... At the end, boat is 2+ tons heavier then it was in the specs!

When it comes to standard definitions, ISO8666 defines clearly what is meant by LCC (light craft condition) and LDC (loaded displacement condition). We usually show either LCC or both LCC and LDC to avoid confusion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:44 AM
eiasu eiasu is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Rep: 10 Posts: 61
Location: novutopia, Germany
Thank you everybody for your answers,
sorry for my ignorance, there is something i do not follow:

Quote:
Originally Posted by sabahcat View Post
You do realise weight and displacement are two different things?

I read it as the boat weighs 8t
Has a displacement of 12.5t
allowing it to carry 4.5t

It will have a different displacement in fresh water vs salt and a different one again if in a sea of mercury
i do not know the difference between weight and displacement,
I thought it was the same, the mass of the fluid moved,
but seemingly it is not so!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2012, 10:24 AM
champ0815 champ0815 is online now
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 28 Posts: 60
Location: Munich, Germany
Well, I think your are not so wrong!
The mentioned displacement is the weight of the loaded ship to the designed water line. The weight is the mass of the more or less empty ship depending on definitions.
But maybe I'm also wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2012, 11:28 AM
Steve W Steve W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rep: 476 Posts: 936
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
You cant really compare displacements of full blown bridgedeck cats like the Gunboat and Atlantic with a minimalist open bridgedeck cat like the Pahi just because they are a similar length, they are completly different animals, there is hugely more surface area with the bridgedeck boats and all this weighs something regardless of what it is built from, plus of course all the systems that just dont exist with the Pahi.


Steve.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-07-2012, 05:49 PM
sabahcat's Avatar
sabahcat sabahcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 273 Posts: 793
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by eiasu View Post
Thank you everybody for your answers,
sorry for my ignorance, there is something i do not follow:



i do not know the difference between weight and displacement,
I thought it was the same, the mass of the fluid moved,
but seemingly it is not so!
Lets make some numbers up for demonstration purposes.

If we have a 50 ft catamaran that displaces 10,000kg meaning when it is on its waterline, it has pushed (displaced) 10,000kg of water aside or if you lifted it out of the water, the two holes where the hulls were would take 10,000kg of water to fill.

Person A builds the boat out of steel and on land that boat weighs 9,900kg.
When he puts it in the water it will float slightly high, pushing aside (displaced) 9,900kg of water.
He could then load 4 friends on board, several hundred litres of water, several months supply of food, beer etc etc etc and it would sink way past its design water line and perform poorly.



Person B build's the same boat from foam/kevlar/epoxy and on land it weigh's 4000kg.
When he put's it in the water it would float very high showing lots of antifoul and it would displace 4000kg of water aside.
He could then load 4 friends on board, several hundred litres of water, several months supply of food, beer etc etc etc and it would still probably only "displace" 5500kg of water, still floating very high and perform very well.

Does that help?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-07-2012, 06:52 PM
DGreenwood DGreenwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 466 Posts: 640
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabahcat View Post
It will have a different displacement in fresh water vs salt and a different one again if in a sea of mercury
Maybe you could explain this??
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-07-2012, 07:02 PM
sabahcat's Avatar
sabahcat sabahcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 273 Posts: 793
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGreenwood View Post
Maybe you could explain this??
Salt, fresh, mercury all have different densities so a vessel of the same weight will sit at different waterlines in that fluid.

Go one step further and have a sea of set concrete, where will the boat be sitting then?

This may help Buoyancy Archimedes Principle
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-07-2012, 07:07 PM
Mr Efficiency Mr Efficiency is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rep: 268 Posts: 1,056
Location: Australia
That sea of mercury was the dream of Carl Keikhafer ! Displacement will only be different in terms of volume, not weight.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-07-2012, 07:20 PM
Steve W Steve W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rep: 476 Posts: 936
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Displacement is derived from the cubic volume of the hull(s) below the designed waterline, seawater = 64 lbs/cubic ft while fresh = 62.5 lbs so the boat will float diferently as Sabahcat pointed out.
Steve.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wharram pahi 42 for sale girvin Marketplace 2 09-24-2010 11:06 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2013 Boat Design Net