| ||||
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Displacemente Pahi 63: how is this possible? I read on the Wharram website Pahi 63 : Weight 8 tons Loading Capacity 4,5 tons Draft 0,9 - 1,5 m And on their websites: Chris White Atlantic 57 Displacement 26,500lbs (12 ton) Gunboat 60 Displacement Lightship16,200 kg 35,715 lbs Displacement Max Load19,000 kg 41,887 lbs How is possible that the Pahi is so light? Built with Ply wood and Epoxy and the other two use much more expensive, sophisticated and light materials? Can't understand !!! Must be something missing ... ciao eiasu |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Theres lies, damn lies and boat weights they all fit into the same category. I'd want to have the boat craned out or weighed on a load cell before I believed a word of it. Also in what state? Lightship and whats defined by lightship varies from designer to designer some even weigh without essentials. Now there is an argument due to the lack of bridgedeck structure you save some weight but that much? I dont think so.
__________________ Multihull Yacht Club of Victoria http://mycv-news.blogspot.com.au blog/projects http://trimaranproject.blogspot.com.au/ |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Pahi 63 plans call as standard for 2 outboards. (2 x 9.9 Hp high trust ?) The Atlantic 57 has 2 inboard diesels with saildrives. (2 x 55 Hp Volvo's) There you might have what, a ton ? *
12 tons what? Empty or Lightship or Max Displacement ? If it's Max Displacement then that's ½ a ton lighter than the Pahi 63. Cheers, Angel P.S. Gunboat 60: Motors + Gensets + Solar System + Battery Bank + Some Equipment Quote:
![]() Defferent boats, different weights.... Last edited by Angélique : 06-07-2012 at 02:18 PM. Reason: added gray Edit line |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| And different interiors, the Pahi 63 is flexi space meaning there is nothing there but compartments with footwells. This eliminates the cabinetry weight. Owners are supposed to furnish with hangings, galley boxes etc.... |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Just check your measurements against the plans then if you have a 3D CAD model the displacement is really easy and accurate from measuring for and aft waterline to deck edge. With ships and larger boats sans plans we take the lines off the boat to find the displacement. It's just as accurate.
__________________ Mike Johns. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I read it as the boat weighs 8t Has a displacement of 12.5t allowing it to carry 4.5t It will have a different displacement in fresh water vs salt and a different one again if in a sea of mercury |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Many catamaran designers give very optimistic numbers for weight to keep the design attractive. Say, there would be weight without structural overweight margin, no genset, no teak, no air-conditioning system, no liferaft... At the end, boat is 2+ tons heavier then it was in the specs! When it comes to standard definitions, ISO8666 defines clearly what is meant by LCC (light craft condition) and LDC (loaded displacement condition). We usually show either LCC or both LCC and LDC to avoid confusion.
__________________ http://albatrossdesign.livejournal.com |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Thank you everybody for your answers, sorry for my ignorance, there is something i do not follow: Quote:
I thought it was the same, the mass of the fluid moved,but seemingly it is not so! |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Well, I think your are not so wrong! The mentioned displacement is the weight of the loaded ship to the designed water line. The weight is the mass of the more or less empty ship depending on definitions. But maybe I'm also wrong? |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| You cant really compare displacements of full blown bridgedeck cats like the Gunboat and Atlantic with a minimalist open bridgedeck cat like the Pahi just because they are a similar length, they are completly different animals, there is hugely more surface area with the bridgedeck boats and all this weighs something regardless of what it is built from, plus of course all the systems that just dont exist with the Pahi. Steve. |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
If we have a 50 ft catamaran that displaces 10,000kg meaning when it is on its waterline, it has pushed (displaced) 10,000kg of water aside or if you lifted it out of the water, the two holes where the hulls were would take 10,000kg of water to fill. Person A builds the boat out of steel and on land that boat weighs 9,900kg. When he puts it in the water it will float slightly high, pushing aside (displaced) 9,900kg of water. He could then load 4 friends on board, several hundred litres of water, several months supply of food, beer etc etc etc and it would sink way past its design water line and perform poorly. Person B build's the same boat from foam/kevlar/epoxy and on land it weigh's 4000kg. When he put's it in the water it would float very high showing lots of antifoul and it would displace 4000kg of water aside. He could then load 4 friends on board, several hundred litres of water, several months supply of food, beer etc etc etc and it would still probably only "displace" 5500kg of water, still floating very high and perform very well. Does that help? |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
| Salt, fresh, mercury all have different densities so a vessel of the same weight will sit at different waterlines in that fluid. Go one step further and have a sea of set concrete, where will the boat be sitting then? This may help Buoyancy Archimedes Principle |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| That sea of mercury was the dream of Carl Keikhafer ! Displacement will only be different in terms of volume, not weight. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Displacement is derived from the cubic volume of the hull(s) below the designed waterline, seawater = 64 lbs/cubic ft while fresh = 62.5 lbs so the boat will float diferently as Sabahcat pointed out. Steve. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wharram pahi 42 for sale | girvin | Marketplace | 2 | 09-24-2010 11:06 AM |