Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Multihulls
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2010, 02:48 PM
SeriolaDumerili SeriolaDumerili is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 20
Location: Croatia
Any finished Kurt Hughes 38 catamaran?

Hello everybody,
is there any already finished 38' catamaran presented on
http://www.multihulldesigns.com/desi.../38catcmp.html ?
Can somebody compare complexity of building this boat with just one foot shorter trimaran also from KH
http://www.multihulldesigns.com/desi.../37tricmp.html
brgds
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2010, 02:55 PM
CatBuilder CatBuilder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Rep: 1308 Posts: 3,040
Location: With Apex1
Are you building in fiberglass or using cylinder mold?
__________________
Kurt Hughes was right about this place.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2010, 03:22 PM
SeriolaDumerili SeriolaDumerili is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 20
Location: Croatia
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatBuilder View Post
Are you building in fiberglass or using cylinder mold?
Just evaluating for now. Preffered method will be fiberglass foam sandwich
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2010, 03:34 PM
CatBuilder CatBuilder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Rep: 1308 Posts: 3,040
Location: With Apex1
I am building a Kurt Hughes 45 and have some experience in both cylinder mold and now am starting a foam/glass sandwich of the same 45'.

My experience so far is that the catamaran will be the easier of these two to build.

The fact that you have 3 hulls to build makes the trimaran more complicated to start. Second, the shape of the trimaran vaka hull is much larger than one of the catamaran hulls. The ammas will be easy, but the vaka has a complicated shape and is large.

Because the catamaran hulls are smaller and the cross beams are small, as is that pod in the center, you will be able to handle moving all the pieces easily. Also, there will only be one mold making the catamaran. There will be two molds making the trimaran.
__________________
Kurt Hughes was right about this place.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2010, 04:05 PM
SeriolaDumerili SeriolaDumerili is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 20
Location: Croatia
Any opinions about 38' catamaran?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2010, 04:19 PM
CatBuilder CatBuilder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Rep: 1308 Posts: 3,040
Location: With Apex1
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeriolaDumerili View Post
Any opinions about 38' catamaran?
The boat in general?

All of Kurt's boats are designed to sail very well. Having no deckhouse means you'll sail even better than most.

It really depends on what type of boat you want.

I was going to say this in the last post, but I didn't want to go too far off topic on your thread.

You should select a boat based on what kind of boat you want in the end. Do you go out jut for the day? Maybe for a weekend? Are you planning to sail to Australia in her?

You should always think carefully about what type of sailing you plan to do with the boat. For example, I chose the 45' bridgedeck Kurt Hughes because I need a boat I can take charter guests on overnight. That is my business reason. My personal reason is I want a boat that sails very well and doesn't need to motor in light winds. Also, I wanted a strong ocean-crossing boat that is large enough for me to feel safe on while crossing the Atlantic. For all of those reasons, I chose the 45' bridgedeck.

It is important to select your boat based on how you will use her, so I cannot suggest any of boat to you unless I know your plans.
__________________
Kurt Hughes was right about this place.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2010, 08:57 PM
jamez jamez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 184 Posts: 272
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeriolaDumerili View Post
Hello everybody,
is there any already finished 38' catamaran presented on
http://www.multihulldesigns.com/desi.../38catcmp.html ?
Can somebody compare complexity of building this boat with just one foot shorter trimaran also from KH
http://www.multihulldesigns.com/desi.../37tricmp.html
brgds

It looks like at least one has been completed, probably the earlier version.

http://www.multihulldesigns.com/desi...ock/38cat.html
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2010, 09:40 PM
cavalier mk2 cavalier mk2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 118 Posts: 820
Location: Pacific NW North America
The trimaran seems a bit more practical for cruising which is a funny thing to be saying. Pod cat hulls are like huge amas which aren't used for much accommodation which loses a cat advantage but is fast racing. The cat would be easier to build for sure. I think Tennant and Crowther also had pod cats if you want to compare apples to apples.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-13-2010, 02:28 AM
SeriolaDumerili SeriolaDumerili is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 20
Location: Croatia
I was looking for a fast cruising catamaran for 2 persons, occasionally 4. Open deck spaces, because I want to sail in mild climate places - Mediterranean, around the world maybe . I have seen Sig 45 catamaran and I like that deck concept. I know that KH 38 is something different but is also sporty and open.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2010, 02:43 AM
catsketcher catsketcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rep: 700 Posts: 691
Location: Australia
Maybe not

I would be really really careful about an open bridge deck design like this for serious cruising. If you do go to the tropics you will want shelter -from the wind, sun and rain. You will get heaps of exposure anyway.

Cruising on far on such a light and fast boat is probably a mistake. I cruised for two seasons on a Crowther Twiggy. A fast trimaran. Strangely enough we went faster on our much more commodious cat a few years later. This is because a light boat is like a Porsche and requires the crew to put up with discomfort and heavy accelerations to go fast. When cruising this gets on your nerves and you slow the boat down. A light speedster is more subject to accelerations than a heavier cruiser so they need to be throttled back much more for sanity's sake. You really want to cruise in a family car rather than a sportscar.

I think everyone likes the idea of a podcat when they build a normal cat. But there are not many around. So the idea doesn't hold anyone strongly. You can make a bridgedeck cat fast, commodious and spartan. My cat originally was designed with no cabin but I put one on after a year in the tropics. If you do decide to go down this route I would suggest you get the hulls of a normal cat of the same size so that could retrofit a cabin on if you change your mind.

cheers

Phil
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kurt Hughes Daycharter 36 Charly Boatbuilding 230 04-01-2012 05:26 PM
An Update on the Kurt Hughes 45 Project (thank you) CatBuilder Boatbuilding 0 09-29-2010 12:34 PM
Kurt Hughes 8m caiman Multihulls 3 12-27-2008 04:33 PM
Cylinder Mold by Kurt Hughes Othmar Multihulls 9 04-10-2008 02:55 AM
kurt hughes rapscallion Multihulls 0 03-09-2007 02:12 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net