Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Multihulls
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2011, 09:50 AM
mikereed100 mikereed100 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 30 Posts: 82
Location: Thailand
Adding vee to cat hulls

My 46’ cat has an unusual construction. The designer used a single mold for the deck and hull which are then joined by a horizontal seam at mid-hull. Thus the hull bottom is a mirror image of the deck. Unfortunately, the properties that make a good deck do not necessarily make a good hull shape. I have found that due to the flat hull bottom the boat will pound mercilessly under some conditions. I am planning to add a vee section forward, tapering to flat in the sterns in an attempt to alleviate some of this pounding. Construction would be a timber stringer over the centerline of the existing hulls with 3mm marine ply skins covered with 450g biax and epoxy. The void between the hull and the addition would be filled with high density pour foam.
If my calculations are correct this will add 160kg weight, 800 liters flotation and move the center of flotation 20cm forward. It will also add 12cm of depth and move the point of greatest depth from about two thirds of the way back to midships, just aft of the daggerboard adding a bit more rocker.

Disadvantages would include a net loss in speed and maneuverability due to;
extra weight
increased lateral resistance due to the vee forward
increased wetted surface

Advantages include;
decreased pounding
the vee would provide a virtual stub keel for taking the ground and added protection for the props
added protection and flotation to the hull in event of collision or accidental grounding
better tracking

My reason for posting here is that I would not like to inadvertently damage the sailing qualities of the boat so am looking for some unbiased opinions on the changes I have planned. Here are some line drawings showing the present hull shape and the changes I have planned.

Mike
Attached Thumbnails
Adding vee to cat hulls-line-drawings-1.jpg  Adding vee to cat hulls-line-drawing-side-view.png  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-22-2011, 11:12 AM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
What boat is that and who is the builder?
To me, this construction technique does not make too much sense.

Why should one get weird hull shape just because someone wants to save some money on moulds? Original shape and Your V-shape are evidently lacking volume aft; CP seems too low.
Yes bow sections are too flat, there is no flare and the boat will be very wet. Deck is something but not practical and comfortable.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2011, 06:38 AM
redreuben redreuben is offline
redreuben
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rep: 164 Posts: 352
Location: Beaconsfield Western Australia
I would avoid the plywood, stringer is good with H80 foam and glass over with bit extra glass and overlap on keel. Pouring foam below waterline, especially around keel is invitation for disaster, chopped out tons of the stuff from inside leaky "buoyancy" tanks absolutely sodden !

RR.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2011, 06:40 AM
redreuben redreuben is offline
redreuben
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rep: 164 Posts: 352
Location: Beaconsfield Western Australia
Reminds me of an IOR boat I sailed on, rating bumps were epoxy bog and ping pong balls !
RR
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2011, 12:37 PM
mikereed100 mikereed100 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 30 Posts: 82
Location: Thailand
Alik,
The designer is a fellow named Copelli, formerly worked at Jeaneau according to the PO. 3 boats were built in Sete, France, one of which was later destroyed by fire, the other was last seen cruising the S. Pacific.

Red,
Ping pong balls, why didn't I think of that! Yes, foam would be my preference over ply, but sourcing the stuff in Thailand can be a challenge. I've done it before but would not like to repeat the experience. I will try again, this time through the boatyard, hopefully with better luck. The ply and polyurethane foam is plan "B".

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2011, 07:22 PM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
Thanks Mike; my first impression was that You are going to build Your boat using this technique. I have seen some in operation and there are a lot of disadvantages...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2011, 09:15 PM
redreuben redreuben is offline
redreuben
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rep: 164 Posts: 352
Location: Beaconsfield Western Australia
Just get it sent from oz ?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-23-2011, 11:37 PM
sabahcat's Avatar
sabahcat sabahcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 257 Posts: 793
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikereed100 View Post
Alik,
Yes, foam would be my preference over ply, but sourcing the stuff in Thailand can be a challenge. I've done it before but would not like to repeat the experience.
I take it the Arnie Duckworth sailing in Thailand

is the same Arnie Duckworth from ATL Composites in Australia

They have Corecell Foam as well as Airex and Coosa whatever that is.

They also have distributors in
THAILAND
East Marine Co.Ltd.

Contact : Scott Bradley

23/159 Moo 2
Tambon Koh Kae
Phuket 83200

Ph: +66 76 239 113
Fax: +66 76 239 132
Email: info@eastmarineasia.com
http://www.eastmarineasia.com/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-24-2011, 03:49 AM
redreuben redreuben is offline
redreuben
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rep: 164 Posts: 352
Location: Beaconsfield Western Australia
Coosa, interesting, http://coosacomposites.com/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-24-2011, 11:35 AM
mikereed100 mikereed100 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 30 Posts: 82
Location: Thailand
Sabahcat,
Thanks for that. I tried to order some Corecell through East Marine a few years back but did not have any luck. I got the impression that while they are technically distributors they weren't much interested in retail, although things may have changed since then. I did get some Divinycell h-80 from the distributor in Chonburi but it was a nightmare and, as Chonburi was a duty-free zone, I had to pay duty, which is always as painfull as possible in Thailand. I plan to haul out at PSS in Satun and they tell me they can get foam so hopefully they are right.

Alik,
I hear you concerning the disadvantages! The flat bottom planes easily and it tacks like a fin keel monohull, but the pounding really is unacceptable. I will happily sacrifice a bit of speed and slower tacking for a little peace and quiet. Hopefully the addition of some vee forward will help in this regard.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-24-2011, 11:45 AM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikereed100 View Post
Sabahcat,
Alik,
I hear you concerning the disadvantages! The flat bottom planes easily and it tacks like a fin keel monohull, but the pounding really is unacceptable. I will happily sacrifice a bit of speed and slower tacking for a little peace and quiet. Hopefully the addition of some vee forward will help in this regard.
Proposed difference in deadrise in original shape and modified V will have almost no effect excerpt of extra weight on speed. But You are getting a headache with attachment part that is joined by secondary bonding. Also resale value of boat will be lower once it is not original and looks 'modified'.

Materials - no plywood; use foam sheets (can be DIAB also produced in Thailand). We did similar surgery on multihull but that one was on wet deck - adding wave breaker wedge.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-24-2011, 11:51 AM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikereed100 View Post
Sabahcat,
Thanks for that. I tried to order some Corecell through East Marine a few years back but did not have any luck. I got the impression that while they are technically distributors they weren't much interested in retail, although things may have changed since then.
East Marine is a subsidiary of Precision Shipwright Services specialised in refit and repair; the build some cats also (2 from us now).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-24-2011, 07:30 PM
sabahcat's Avatar
sabahcat sabahcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 257 Posts: 793
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikereed100 View Post
I plan to haul out at PSS in Satun
I'll be keen on a report on PSS

Its where I was planning on getting my boat to after launch so as to get the finishing touches internally after a 6 mth shake down cruise from Brisbane to there.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-24-2011, 09:32 PM
cavalier mk2 cavalier mk2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 118 Posts: 820
Location: Pacific NW North America
I'd think about making the stem deeper yet with more v in the forward section. In any case your center of lateral resistance will move forward a bit so you may have to adjust the rig forward. Rake might do it but your stays may need alteration if it is a big change.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-24-2011, 10:14 PM
HakimKlunker's Avatar
HakimKlunker HakimKlunker is offline
t=pc squared ?????
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Rep: 111 Posts: 171
Location: Langkawi Malaysia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alik View Post
What boat is that and who is the builder?
To me, this construction technique does not make too much sense.

Why should one get weird hull shape just because someone wants to save some money on moulds? ...
Basically agreed. I think, I once saw Farrier doing it similar. However: Even then, you will need two moulds - and it would be possible to shape them the right way.
But the boat here and now was already made.
To my understanding you are familiar with buoyancy and trim calculation.
Did you consider to simply remove the wrong shape and replace with an improved body? On first sight that looks like much more work, but building up a new shape around the 'old' hulls also requires quite some time for adjustment, alignment and fairing.
The idea of casting foam contains traps: You will not be able to discover voids and there is a clear risk of over-expansion when too much foam is poured, or when it meets narrow spots.
Plywood: can be tricky, because(in 'our regions') you must be faster than the termites. And local 'Marine Plywood' is a somewhat relative description of what you REALLY get
- - -
Getting material from overseas: We recently received a complete container full of nice things. The local retailers could not offer us a price advantage.
'ATL' was mentioned before, and I must say that they are extremely supportive. That does of course not mean that the others are not...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Assymetric Cat Hulls basildog Multihulls 76 05-05-2012 09:22 AM
Raising the Roof? (adding headroom to an older Cat) mark424x Boatbuilding 0 09-07-2009 10:45 PM
house bout with cat hulls jawshunter Multihulls 12 12-08-2007 06:10 PM
Power Cat Hulls bearwen Boat Design 2 11-30-2005 01:20 PM
25 Vee and 41 Cat Molds maxthunder Boat Molds 5 12-15-2004 10:19 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net