Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Wiki (beta)  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors  |  Sitemap

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Motorsailers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2009, 05:06 PM
IONA IONA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 6
Location: Louisiana
Keel Design on my 57' Buehler design

IONA IONA is online now

Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 1
Location: Louisiana
Keel design at prop
She's a 57' George Beuhler designed cruiser and I am nearing the end of building the keel. My engine is a DD4-71 and I have a 2" shaft to a 28-20 3-bladed RH prop. The keel is 11" thick. My question is what is the best way of carving that big thick keel in the area around the cutless bearing housing so as to maximize flow over the prop and minimize the kick of the prop as well. I assume I will want to carve what, viewed from the stern, would look like an "S" shape, with the shaft coming out in the middle of the "S" but my question is, which way will the prop kick the boat? And which way should the "S" face? Should it look like a standard "S" viewing her from the stern, or a reversed "S", and why? If this is not a clear question please view my little attached drawing.


View my progress at this album page:
http://picasaweb.google.com/GreyFox1931/GregSBoatyard#
Attached Thumbnails
keel-design-my-57-buehler-design-s-cuts.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-31-2009, 06:30 PM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 1133 Posts: 4,697
Location: Riccelli Restorations - Eustis, FL
Duplicate post. Check the wooden boat section for a reply.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2009, 12:47 AM
peter radclyffe peter radclyffe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 89 Posts: 312
Location: elba italy
Quote:
Originally Posted by IONA View Post
IONA IONA is online now

Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 1
Location: Louisiana
Keel design at prop
She's a 57' George Beuhler designed cruiser and I am nearing the end of building the keel. My engine is a DD4-71 and I have a 2" shaft to a 28-20 3-bladed RH prop. The keel is 11" thick. My question is what is the best way of carving that big thick keel in the area around the cutless bearing housing so as to maximize flow over the prop and minimize the kick of the prop as well. I assume I will want to carve what, viewed from the stern, would look like an "S" shape, with the shaft coming out in the middle of the "S" but my question is, which way will the prop kick the boat? And which way should the "S" face? Should it look like a standard "S" viewing her from the stern, or a reversed "S", and why? If this is not a clear question please view my little attached drawing.


View my progress at this album page:
http://picasaweb.google.com/GreyFox1931/GregSBoatyard#
Its usual to combine the two, like most things in life the back face of the sternpost should have minimal drag, the lowest part of a prop gives more thrust than the higher part, as it is in denser water, what a terrific project, its very impressive
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-09-2009, 05:12 AM
GAZZABO's Avatar
GAZZABO GAZZABO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 26
Location: Whangarei,n.z.
Greg- Well have you got yourself a project! I would chamfer both sides top and bottom of the deadwood to minimise the drag and smooth the prop (le3ss deadwater to go thru) good luck and keep posting your fotos
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-29-2009, 04:57 PM
dskira's Avatar
dskira dskira is offline
Pine Tar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 284 Posts: 262
Location: Maine
Nice job. You are almost there
Cheers
Daniel
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-29-2009, 09:13 PM
GAZZABO's Avatar
GAZZABO GAZZABO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 26
Location: Whangarei,n.z.
Looks good. I will be doing the same next year when I start my liveaboard Troller see FOOTHOLD photo now posted .
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2009, 09:33 AM
IONA IONA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 6
Location: Louisiana
The stern timber went on last week. (The last of the 2x12 laminations. Hooray!) The next thing I did was level her off. (Only needed to lower the stern by about 1.5 inches to reach level.) Now I am laying out the lines for the frames and floors so I can start drilling the holes for the thru bolts. I am thinking of using .75" rod in 1.25" holes. After I drill the holes I will soak a rag with ethylene glycol and saturate all the holes with that. After it dries I will weld the rod bottoms onto the steel plate that will run along the bottom rather than thread them and bolt them, then coat the inside of the plate with roofing tar. Then I will push the plate up to the keel from underneath, bring the rods up with it, and then pour a slow-kick epoxy down the holes to permanently secure the rods. After I make the floors up I will thread the rods as needed on the top. Should be waterproof and solid as a rock. Also I don't want any trouble between the wood and the steel, and I like this way of attaching the steel plate without screws. I just don’t like the idea of wood screws into the keel on the bottom. Once all those buggers are made I can set up my framing table and begin the process of building frames. That will be the time when I start working on the engine bed and the shaft. I figure it’s another four years minimum. But I finally figured out that building this boat is an end in and of itself.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2009, 10:44 AM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 1133 Posts: 4,697
Location: Riccelli Restorations - Eustis, FL
In other words, if you take damage, you can't easily remove the metal shoe? That about as counter productive as it gets, especially for a Buehler build.

Lets face it, this boat's going to be big enough to bash stuff real good. That keel shoe is going to dent, get deformed and other wise smashed around pretty good. If you marry it to your keel like that, you have hell to pay when it comes time to address the shoe.

The keel shoe should always be considered sacrificial in nature. It should be bedded and fairly lightly attached, unless you plan frequent hard landings.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-31-2009, 02:01 PM
IONA IONA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 6
Location: Louisiana
PAR
The reason I read this site is because I don't know everything. Here is a great example of that. Why didn't I think of that? Maybe because I haven't ever done this before. You are right. I am wrong. Back to my drawing board. I was looking for a way to keep from having to bed the ends of the rods in epoxy the way George describes it. More thinking will now take place in my think box.

Thanks PAR for excellent mentoring.
- Greg Nelson
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-31-2009, 04:22 PM
Hägar's Avatar
Hägar Hägar is offline
the horrible....?
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Rep: 23 Posts: 10
Location: Danmark
Thats what I love here, you may be wrong but you do not end up wrong!

Hägar
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-31-2009, 04:36 PM
GAZZABO's Avatar
GAZZABO GAZZABO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 26
Location: Whangarei,n.z.
Iona-- Why are you building the right way up? Im going to do it the traditional Kiwi way and byuild upside down and then then clean off the keel to 200 wide and then laminate the outer keel and deadwood on. All my frames are bulkheads which are shaped to include all bunk seats and backs, bench divisions etc , so when we turn over (1 hour $100) all I have to do is all the accommodation longitudinals in.Fitting bulkheads after sheathing is really time consuming, My way I get all the bevels correct when lining off and installing the stringers.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-31-2009, 09:15 PM
dskira's Avatar
dskira dskira is offline
Pine Tar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 284 Posts: 262
Location: Maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAZZABO View Post
Iona-- Why are you building the right way up? Im going to do it the traditional Kiwi way and byuild upside down and then then clean off the keel to 200 wide and then laminate the outer keel and deadwood on. All my frames are bulkheads which are shaped to include all bunk seats and backs, bench divisions etc , so when we turn over (1 hour $100) all I have to do is all the accommodation longitudinals in.Fitting bulkheads after sheathing is really time consuming, My way I get all the bevels correct when lining off and installing the stringers.
You are right in a certain conditions. I built a lot of boat as you describe, but after a while, I went back to right side up. I find easier to control the shape, mostly the sheer, I find rewarding to put the keel first, and built from the keel up, I find the accommdation not so difficult after all. It is true that I put a ceiling.
But this is my opinion, and I respect yours who also make sense.
Cheers
Daniel
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-31-2009, 10:27 PM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 1133 Posts: 4,697
Location: Riccelli Restorations - Eustis, FL
I prefer to mold hulls upside down, but there comes point when you have to roll the beast over. This isn't much of an issue on small craft, but massively built 57'ers should be considered a candidate to build upright.

Back to the keel shoe. Instead of tar, have the shoe coated with spray on truck bed liner. Make sure you drill the fasteners holes over size, because the truck bed liner will fill them. Then bed your shoe in the goo of choice, which I'd recommend being 3M 101 as opposed to tar. 3M 101 is much more flexible, will stick very well to both the polyurethane in the truck bed liner and the keel and it will not attack anything like petroleum based tar products can, plus it can be removed without damage. Besides, you don't want an oil slick floating around your boat all the time, which tar will produce. Tar is effective, but only if this is the only thing you have available. There are much better materials, that don't harm the environment as much as tar.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-02-2009, 05:33 PM
IONA IONA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 6
Location: Louisiana
PAR! Thanks again. I have been trying to figure out thew best way to do this ever since i got near finishing the keel.
What fasteners do you reccomend? Galv. long wood screws?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-02-2009, 07:54 PM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 1133 Posts: 4,697
Location: Riccelli Restorations - Eustis, FL
Galvanized will work, though bronze be my first choice. Make sure you get hot dipped, not the "electro-galvanized" they're trying to sell currently. Real hot dipped will last a while, the electro-crap will not. Shop around for fasteners as it's getting hard to find good ones. Seeing as George's designs rely so heavily on fasteners, you'd be best advised to get the best you can afford.

On your boat, epoxy will be used as a glue only. Don't coat the parts, you're just tossing money and time in the bilge.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Keel design at prop IONA Boat Design 2 04-01-2009 03:30 AM
New Keel design..... fhrussell Boat Design 1 03-10-2007 09:04 AM
Keel Design Lyle Creffield Open Discussion 2 01-05-2007 03:59 PM
strongback for 57' steel hull Enders Metal Boat Building 5 11-02-2006 02:41 AM
keel design max Boat Design 3 10-18-2003 04:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin 3 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2009 Boat Design Net