Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Motorsailers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:16 PM
yades's Avatar
yades yades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rep: 166 Posts: 82
Location: italy
Evaluation Of Axial Compression Force On A Mast

Just to add a further technical contribution on the issue (with a resulting compression load value !!...)which I believe being of good interest to many keen speculators on this subject......

Cheers...

YADES
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Mast Compression Load-MASTER.PDF (111.8 KB, 437 views)
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-27-2008, 01:08 AM
charmc charmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 833 Posts: 2,390
Location: FL, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanie View Post
One more thing on sails - won't a few long thin vertical sails give you more windward speed than one big sail ?
"It is well known that higher aspect sails produce greater lift when close hauled." "What's the Ideal Sailing Rig?" Michael Kasten, Kasten Marine Design

Yes. Think schooner, as in Bluenose, America.
Attached Thumbnails
Forces on mast by sails yet again-redpath_sailing.jpg  
Attached Images
  
__________________
Best,

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-27-2008, 01:13 AM
charmc charmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 833 Posts: 2,390
Location: FL, USA
There are limits, though. Too high and thin (too high an aspect ratio) and they will stall at low "angle of attack". In other words, they will be great when pointed well up, but not efficient at other points further off the wind. Not versatile. I think AR of 3 -4 is considered best for all around use.
__________________
Best,

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-27-2008, 04:42 PM
Fanie's Avatar
Fanie Fanie is offline
Fanie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 1930 Posts: 4,195
Location: Safrica
I hate these compromises. One would think that after all these years and years of sailing experience you guys would have come up with some kind of golden rule to what works and what doesn't. Instead everyone blunders ahead and this theory and then this formula... I think I mentioned this before.

Eh YADES !! The pdf you uploaded is just about spot on with my size cat. Same mast length, same boat size, couldn't ask for a better calculated example Only thing I don't like is the 6000kg mast loading That is quite a bit of loading, considering that is the weight of 6 toyota carolla 1600's eh !
__________________
Regards
Fanie

Water ! Just gimme water !
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-27-2008, 08:00 PM
MikeJohns MikeJohns is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1623 Posts: 2,344
Location: Australia
Fanie
The lack of exact definition is because anything to do with fluids and dynamics is basically indeterminate. Thats why we use static loads and then a factor of safety to allow for indeterminate loads. The FOS is then refined through observation. It is only with dead static loads that we can design absolute to specific numbers and know it will last.


The most up to date rule from any society for rig design is from Germanisher Lloyd, (it is a public domain document) attached. As the knowledge and particularly materials and design move on the newer guides are more applicable.

GL as underwriters suggest that a vessels rig be designed to this spec. So they are putting their rule where their money is, as to speak

Hopefully it will help you along with the others contributions.
Cheers
Attached Files
File Type: pdf GL Rig calc .pdf (173.6 KB, 219 views)
__________________
Mike Johns.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-28-2008, 06:53 AM
yades's Avatar
yades yades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rep: 166 Posts: 82
Location: italy
Mast Compression Load - reply to Fanie..

I'm pleased to read on your reply that the example is just fitting yr situation....... That' s because I made some ......realistic assumptions..... as stated on the enclosed paper, for the evaluation of mcl, based on the infos gathered from your previous threads...........However, bear in mind reason for such a high compression load is mainly due to a no-spreaders rig arrangement and also due to a deck-stepped mast.....
__________________
Cheers...
YADES
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-28-2008, 10:19 PM
Guest625101138 Guest625101138 is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanie View Post
I hate these compromises. One would think that after all these years and years of sailing experience you guys would have come up with some kind of golden rule to what works and what doesn't. Instead everyone blunders ahead and this theory and then this formula... I think I mentioned this before.

Eh YADES !! The pdf you uploaded is just about spot on with my size cat. Same mast length, same boat size, couldn't ask for a better calculated example Only thing I don't like is the 6000kg mast loading That is quite a bit of loading, considering that is the weight of 6 toyota carolla 1600's eh !
Fanie
If you want to reduce mast compression then reduce displacement. If you get it to displace one toyota corolla rather than 6 then you only need to allow for one corolla of compression.

Poor design results in failures and why you see boats set to sea and then make a quick retreat as things start to fall apart.

Yades result is close to my original number provided in one of the very earlier posts on this thread, #11. My calculation did not have any safety factor apart from a small one based on my mostly conservative simplifying assumptions.

Rick W.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-29-2008, 11:09 PM
Richard Atkin Richard Atkin is offline
atn_atkin@hotmail.com
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Rep: 219 Posts: 606
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Fanie you want to have your cake and eat it too. And you want the icing to be thicker and you want candles too

Quote: "won't a few long thin vertical sails give you more windward speed than one big sail ?"

The way I see it, one big sail (long and thin) will give more windward speed than several smaller ones, but will also give you more heeling force and bigger rigging loads.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-29-2008, 11:21 PM
Richard Atkin Richard Atkin is offline
atn_atkin@hotmail.com
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Rep: 219 Posts: 606
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Sorry Fanie, I haven't been keeping up with all your threads. Have you decided on a boat length yet?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-15-2008, 08:16 PM
Western grace Western grace is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rep: -7 Posts: 4
Location: PNW
Righting force dictates rig size.

Hi Fanie,

Am not a expert but have a 57' heavy offshore cutter. The righing moment of the hull is the firts thing to look at. Walk the docks and you can see fast differents in size of rigs.

Look at it this way. your rig should be strong enough to witstand a knockdown. A tender vessel will lay over a lot easier than a stiff vessel thus a tender vessel needs a lot les rig than a stiffer one. so you start with getting the righting moment than calculate forces. just doing the math on sail area is sitting you up for disaster.

good luck

John Van Strien
Sv Western Grace
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-15-2008, 08:26 PM
Fanie's Avatar
Fanie Fanie is offline
Fanie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 1930 Posts: 4,195
Location: Safrica
Thanks for your comments, all is taken in consideration. I still have some things to work through before making any final decissions on boat length, sail or sails sizes and so on. So many compromizes... in the 'old' days things were much more simple, not even to mention time. Since this is an expensive exercise I'd like to do it more or less right the first time.

Thanks for the goog luck John, I'll take it
__________________
Regards
Fanie

Water ! Just gimme water !
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-15-2008, 08:30 PM
Western grace Western grace is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rep: -7 Posts: 4
Location: PNW
be carefull

Fanie,

As you are starting out be carefull. building a boat is very expensive even when building a proven design. If you go and build a unproven design you set your self up for failure. having come to a large building process can only recommend buying a baot or finshing a well done project. have seen many go down with the project that is financial.

John
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-23-2008, 05:37 PM
BigCat's Avatar
BigCat BigCat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rep: 27 Posts: 72
Location: near Seattle
If you are trying to understand the relationship between wind speed and pressure, it is calculated with Martin's formula, which is the square of the wind speed in miles per hour x .004 = pounds per square foot.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-27-2008, 08:49 AM
FAST FRED FAST FRED is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 700 Posts: 3,208
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big dock & room for O'nite stop .
A very rough rule is the sails will produce 1 lb/sq/ft of pressure at 17K.

FF
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Forces on the mast ArZillO Sailboats 0 10-28-2004 11:33 AM
Aero-hydrodynamic forces dawor Sailboats 1 02-17-2004 07:36 PM
Sail Forces...again nemo Sailboats 5 02-15-2004 09:42 PM
sail forces, how to calculate Guest Sailboats 0 01-04-2004 01:36 PM
Aero-hydrodynamic forces dawor Boat Design 3 11-23-2003 01:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net