Is a stainless steel boat possible?

Discussion in 'Materials' started by hansp77, May 2, 2006.

  1. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    I've used what my friend had in shipyard...no choiche!
    The boat was built on 1986...20 years ago...!
     
  2. Wellydeckhand

    Wellydeckhand Previous Member

    I would ask the grade of varies type..... 316 seem to be the norm? the special would cost a lot more and still if you have a dream then burning money is still an option:)
     
  3. frank marsden
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: Rugby, England

    frank marsden Junior Member

    316/2205

    I replaced the standing rigging on my 26' Superseal (Ron Holland design) in spring 2005. 1x19 s/s 5mm wire

    Boat is on a swinging mooring in Portland Harbour , Dorset, England.

    By September, there were spiral rusty looking marks on all the rigging.

    General opinion, which I cannot confirm, was that this is due too insuficient cleaning of the individual strand after wire drawing.

    Does anyone know anything about this?

    The rigging supplier 'fixed'? this by cleaning the rigging with something like Scotchbrite.

    After hearing that someone else had this problem, I enquired with BSSA (British Stainless Steel Association)

    The bombshell in the conversation was when the consultant said that 316 was not realy suitable for a marine environment, but you yachties get away with it because you put up with a short life e.g. ten years. He went on to say if the use was for a suspension bridge, for example, with a design life of 120 years, you would specify 2205, which has higher percentages of alloying components including 6% molybdenum.
    316 is 2%

    My first experience of s/s corrosion was when the mast on my OK dinghy fell over due to the two 5mm bolts holding the wooden block at the mast foot disintegrating.

    S/s of ??? spec in permanently wet wood, kind of condition in previous post.
     
  4. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    "...burning money...". I have used what my friend had in shipyard, it is not a question of money...but for me a dream has no price...
     
  5. I understand about, I am also involved in a friendship building in my yard (long time already...sik...no time!)
     
  6. CORMERAN
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 65
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 13
    Location: Vancover,BC, Canada

    CORMERAN Junior Member

    S.s. Corrosion

    I would suggest that messers; IKE and FRANK MARSDEN are on the
    right track.

    The main concern to me is......

    CREVICE CORROSION !!!

    Note: Fine cracks, virtually invisable to the eye - dont easily allow
    a free flow of air.
    Whereas; according to M.I.T. - the capilary power of water is:
    - a MILLION p.s.i. !!
    ( A sobering fact - for boat designers and sailors to consider.)

    Meaning: your SS will corrode. For sure. The only debate is:
    - How long will it take.
    Adding fuel to the fire ( literally) - like immersing your expensive alloy
    in a corrosive electrolyte, simply speeds things up !

    SS deck cleats work well. - Because they lack CREVICES.
    Also they are supplied generously with oxegen.
    ( Except when you are sailing well heeled over - with the
    rail awash.)

    WELDING is a major concern as well. ( Especialy in SS.)
    It's logical that: as the alloy is formed with heat
    - it follows: that heating it, by welding, will undo the alloy's integrity.
    - defeating the whole perpose for using SS, in the first place.

    Also: Note CORMERAN's 33rd Law:

    " The only good weld - is an X - RAYED weld "

    (Now; there's an extra cost - that most backyard builders
    will not want to hear about.)

    Suffice to say:

    Check out the history of the ALASKA PIPELINE - where
    they tried to skimp on X - Ray testing - and had to
    redo miles and miles - and miles of bad welds. At 40 below!
     
  7. Wellydeckhand

    Wellydeckhand Previous Member

    SS used mix-gas for shielding...... the gas also cool the job while preventing the oxygen from contiminate the weld....

    WDH
     
  8. it is true that polishing minimizes corrosion??? and so why 304 in deck hardware it is acceptable instead of 316??
     
  9. FAST FRED
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 4,519
    Likes: 111, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1009
    Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big d

    FAST FRED Senior Member

    it is true that polishing minimizes corrosion???

    polishing minimizes the parts surface area , therefore less corrosion.

    Electro polishing removes free iron in the surface of the SS part by plating something with the iron.

    Po Boy polishing is simply using Ospho (a weak mix of Osphoric acid) and a detergent to hold it in place on the surface.

    A table spoon of Joy and 2 or 3 of Ospho can be scrubbed on with a scotch brite pad and allowed to dry. Do it a couple of times and the surface iron will be mostly gone.
    This leaves rather medocre SS looking fine for a few months , at low cost.

    FAST FRED
     
  10. Buckle
    Joined: May 2004
    Posts: 83
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Plymouth, UK

    Buckle Composite Engineer

    Rust at the welds.

    Sandard A4 or 316 SS is non-magnetic. However if you weld pieces together, upon cooling, the weld and surroundinng area microstructure turns into A2 (i.e. magnetic).

    I know jack about welding, except how to do a half decent weld, but it would be interesting how you would cool your SS so that it remains A4 especially ove large areas?
     
  11. lewisboats
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 2,329
    Likes: 129, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1603
    Location: Iowa

    lewisboats Obsessed Member

    use 316L and there is much less of a problem...the carbon level is especially low in this alloy.

    Steve
     
  12. john.G
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 44
    Likes: 4, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 62
    Location: australia

    john.G Junior Member

    For a really good understanding of the pro's & con's of building in different metals it's worth reading an article by Michael Kasten www.kastenmarine.com
    Somewhere in the site in his articles on boatbuilding with metal is one devoted to this that I would recomend anyone read.

    316L stainless is used because the lower carbon level reduces precipitation which in turn reduces the tendency to fatigue. Crevice corrosion is still a problem though.

    Fast Fred is right. Monel's better. I personally have been considering using 70/30 copper nickel plate on monel frames for a boat to see me out (I'm in my mid 30's) but the issue is cost.

    If it cost's 4 to 6 times more to build a hull to last a lifetime, wouldn't I be better to just build 4 hulls in a lifetime:?: But then I remind myself how much I hate barnacles.
     
  13. Wellydeckhand

    Wellydeckhand Previous Member

    4 boat in a life-time is better...... you should often the picture gallery and really a need to build a better boat.:)

    Well as long as the SS doesnt sit in salt water then it is a very good shinny material for deck decoration and ultility.

    WDH
     
  14. CORMERAN
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 65
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 13
    Location: Vancover,BC, Canada

    CORMERAN Junior Member

    Up to fairly long waterline lengths, it's hard to be more cost/ effective than
    - wood and epoxy.
    After all: if God had ment us to make steel boats - would he not have created
    - steel trees........ ??
     

  15. Raggi_Thor
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 2,457
    Likes: 64, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 711
    Location: Trondheim, NORWAY

    Raggi_Thor Nav.arch/Designer/Builder

    Stainless steel must be for the look of it :)
    I can see no other reason.
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.