Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Construction > Materials
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2005, 04:44 PM
RichardM RichardM is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 3
Location: CT
Epoxy vs Vinyl vs Polly

I am boat shopping and I'm fairly new to boating and I'm confused by the different types of resins and methods being employed. Everyone seems to agree vacuum bag wet-out and epoxy resin apears to be the superior method of hull construction. Lighter, stronger, more stiff, better bonding, lower water transmitence and overall most cost effective.
If it were simply a matter of economics, i.e. epoxy cost more than vinyl and vilyl more than polly I could understand why manufacturers choose different methods, but I am finding sport fish boats fabricated with epoxy construction competitively priced to their polly and vinyl counterparts.
Am I missing something? Why don't all builders use epoxy?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2005, 08:00 PM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1397 Posts: 7,215
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Polyester resin costs about 1/4 of epoxy. It is also easier to use. It wets faster and the mix ratio is not as critical. For medium performance applications, where minimum weight is not necessary, epoxy is a waste. On the other hand, the cost of the hull is maybe 10% of the total boat. That means that using epoxy increases the total cost by 15-20%.
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2005, 11:50 PM
Deering Deering is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 14 Posts: 219
Location: Juneau, Alaska
Epoxy is clearly superior in most respects. If I could buy the same boat, for the same price, in either epoxy or polyester, epoxy wins hands down, regardless of the usage. Different boats, different prices... now you need to consider other factors as well.

Did that help? No? Sorry... welcome to boating.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2005, 12:41 AM
John ilett's Avatar
John ilett John ilett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 23 Posts: 131
Location: Perth Australia
Poly or Viynelester boats can all use gelcoats to get the nice durable and glossy moulded finish whereas epoxy gelcoats do not really exist. For a moulded epoxy hull a poly gel can be applied with extra tie coats or needs to be painted which is not so durable.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2005, 11:27 AM
RichardM RichardM is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 3
Location: CT
Thanks John. I thought urethanes were taking the place of gelcoats o0n epoxy hulls.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2005, 03:25 PM
Raggi_Thor's Avatar
Raggi_Thor Raggi_Thor is offline
Nav.arch/Designer/Builder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 696 Posts: 2,457
Location: Trondheim, NORWAY
I think polyurethan paints can last as long as polyester gelcoat and look better without any waxing.
__________________
Regards, Kvedja, mvh,
Ragnar Thor Mikkelsen
www.MBOATS.no
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2005, 07:17 PM
John ilett's Avatar
John ilett John ilett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 23 Posts: 131
Location: Perth Australia
Gelcoats may need polishing in the longer term but are harder, thicker and more durable (abrasion durability) than paints. Your paints are generally thin and when scratched will cut through to your undercoat or primer to often show another colour. Sure paints look good when new but but may look pretty average 5 years down the track. I feel when restoring older boats the gelcoat finish should be kept and maintained as long as possible.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2005, 08:51 AM
JR-Shine JR-Shine is offline
SHINE
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 50 Posts: 282
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raggi_Thor
I think polyurethan paints can last as long as polyester gelcoat and look better without any waxing.

I second this opinion - Gel coats may be harder, but they are also much more brittle - they crack. paint will not crack as easy.

Unless you need it to build something in a mold - I cant think of any other application where I would prefer it over paint.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-09-2005, 09:06 AM
John ilett's Avatar
John ilett John ilett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 23 Posts: 131
Location: Perth Australia
The gel only cracks where a laminate is too flexible, usually solid laminate boats without sandwich construction.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-09-2005, 09:14 AM
JR-Shine JR-Shine is offline
SHINE
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 50 Posts: 282
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Please explain cracks in gelcoat around mounted hardware (hinges, bowrails, consoles, etc....)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-09-2005, 09:24 AM
John ilett's Avatar
John ilett John ilett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 23 Posts: 131
Location: Perth Australia
These are points where the laminate is flexed I imagine.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-09-2005, 09:30 AM
JR-Shine JR-Shine is offline
SHINE
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 50 Posts: 282
Location: Vero Beach, FL
I disagree, the gelcoat can crack due to its being brittle alone - the laminate under it does not need to move.

You are right also, it the laminate moves - then the gelcoat will most likely crack.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-10-2005, 02:48 AM
yokebutt yokebutt is offline
Boatbuilder
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 15 Posts: 545
Location: alameda CA
But, but, but, John, how can that be, all the old salts I've talked to insist that solid laminates are much stronger....

Yoke.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-10-2005, 03:36 AM
John ilett's Avatar
John ilett John ilett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 23 Posts: 131
Location: Perth Australia
A solid laminate boat is more robust and fail safe like, but that does not stop them flexing. The laminate will flex (not fail) and the gel coat being brittle cracks.

Sandwich boats are typically much thicker/stiffer and do not flex.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-10-2005, 06:11 AM
FAST FRED FAST FRED is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 700 Posts: 3,208
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big dock & room for O'nite stop .
"all the old salts I've talked to insist that solid laminates are much stronger..."

What has fooled the "old salts" is that at high load spots the solid laminate is usually stiffer than cored material with poor (quick) construction for the high load.

Cracks in gelcoat at stress points is a SURE sign of broken laminate and the need for a robust repair..

Most glass is strong enough , but getting it stiff enough to not come unglued over the years is always the hard design part.

Basically if its stiff enough to never flex , it may weigh a bit more , but will last almost forever.

The old glass boats , that were built to what would be insane scantlings today , dont flex and will live till sunk, or burned.

FAST FRED
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Epoxy vs Polly & Vinyl RichardM Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 2 12-12-2005 05:47 AM
Epoxy over Polyester Blue Heron Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 6 12-09-2005 12:48 PM
Epoxy crystallization jfblouin Materials 4 09-15-2005 12:19 PM
Easier way for balsa core deck replacement? pago cruiser Boatbuilding 4 06-01-2005 07:20 PM
epoxy vs vinyl lprimina Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 8 11-27-2004 07:09 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net