Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Wiki (beta)  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors  |  Sitemap

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion > Inboards
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2009, 04:57 PM
Xtreme Xtreme is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 3
Location: RSA
What would be the best engine and drive

For a 40 ft aluminium, 2.600 KGS, monohull cigarrette like hull boat,

What would you suggest the best engine/s and drive/s type to move this boat, to be able to do 60-70 MPH at sea and carry 12-16 passengers on exciting rides.

Many thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-04-2009, 05:07 PM
rasorinc rasorinc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 155 Posts: 608
Location: seal rock, oregon
A pair of GM marine inboard engines LSA 6.2L V8 SC. HP is 530 each. See details
on this GM marine engines site. They are lightweight aluminum blocks. I would go with standard inboard setups. However, surface drives give you a little more speed but standard inboards give you better reverse and control.
http://www.gm.com/experience/technol...ne_engines.jsp
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2009, 12:11 PM
Xtreme Xtreme is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 3
Location: RSA
Thanks. I will look into it.
Would 2 petrol Mercruisers x 365hp and jet drives be sufficient and give a fast speed or not?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2009, 12:12 PM
masalai masalai is offline
masalai
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 922 Posts: 6,421
Location: SE Queensland, Australia
In 10 years you may want one that does not need petro-chemical fuels
__________________
building commenced 23April2009 - - http://boboramdesign.wordpress.com/39-c/
chatter on my build progress . . . http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/boa...-new-post.html
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2009, 09:24 AM
fasteddy106's Avatar
fasteddy106 fasteddy106 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Rep: 64 Posts: 55
Location: connecticut
Quote:
Originally Posted by masalai View Post
In 10 years you may want one that does not need petro-chemical fuels
Cultist!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2009, 05:41 PM
masalai masalai is offline
masalai
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 922 Posts: 6,421
Location: SE Queensland, Australia
You really need to join my cult, - - for survival in the future
__________________
building commenced 23April2009 - - http://boboramdesign.wordpress.com/39-c/
chatter on my build progress . . . http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/boa...-new-post.html
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-08-2009, 04:50 PM
Xtreme Xtreme is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 3
Location: RSA
Malasai, you are sending your message to the wrong person

I am only interested in powerboats. Sorry but I still have better things to do than hiding away from the family by sailing and drinking cases of beer.
Thanks but no thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-10-2009, 11:58 AM
mongo75's Avatar
mongo75 mongo75 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 95 Posts: 258
Location: Orange County California
How about twin deisels mated to heavy duty Merc drives? You'd get more torque and fuel economy than a gas engine. Plus if your lucky you can find biodiesel cheaper than #2
__________________
Danny
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-10-2009, 01:25 PM
marshmat's Avatar
marshmat marshmat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 933 Posts: 3,638
Location: Ontario
All true, Danny, but at what cost?

Mercury-marinized GM engines tend to sell for about $50 to $100 per horsepower. High-revving performance marine diesels often cost double that- and $300/hp is not at all uncommon. And, pushed to the limit like this, either option is going to be very demanding on its mechanic, probably needing rebuilding after a couple thousand hours.

For a cigarette boat- essentially a big toy- that might only see 60 to 100 hours of use in a year, the hundred-thousand-dollar difference might well buy more fuel that the boat will use in its lifetime.

The question must be asked, though- what's with the 16 passengers? If you're just out to give tourists a thrill ride, there's no need to go over 45 mph. Get landlubbers out there at 40, they'll think they're doing 80 as long as you don't get passed by a boat that really is doing 80. Drop the trim and the tabs at 30 mph, put the helm hard over, and bring up a huge wall of spray- that's what the "speedboat experience" is about, for the passengers.
__________________
-Matt Marsh-
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-10-2009, 01:33 PM
apex1's Avatar
apex1 apex1 is offline
Steamer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep: 592 Posts: 2,800
Location: Hamburg
Quote:
Originally Posted by marshmat View Post

The question must be asked, though- what's with the 16 passengers? If you're just out to give tourists a thrill ride, there's no need to go over 45 mph. Get landlubbers out there at 40, they'll think they're doing 80 as long as you don't get passed by a boat that really is doing 80. Drop the trim and the tabs at 30 mph, put the helm hard over, and bring up a huge wall of spray- that's what the "speedboat experience" is about, for the passengers.
Right Matt, and on top: I doubt you get a 40ft carrying 16 pax to 80kn with some shabby 1000 horses. Double that, at least (and pay the price). The 10cyl. MAN are the engines of choice in that case, coupled with Arnesons. Just 500.000$ over the counter.

Regards
Richard
__________________
Fortior est qui se quam qui fortissima vincit Moenia.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-10-2009, 01:48 PM
marshmat's Avatar
marshmat marshmat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 933 Posts: 3,638
Location: Ontario
Of course, Richard, if one really wants a boat to go fast on a tight capital-costs budget, one could go to an aircraft wrecking yard and hunt down a worn-out heavy lift helicopter... the 11,240 hp Lotarev D-136 engine used in the Mi-26 comes to mind....
__________________
-Matt Marsh-
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-10-2009, 01:52 PM
apex1's Avatar
apex1 apex1 is offline
Steamer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep: 592 Posts: 2,800
Location: Hamburg
Quote:
Originally Posted by marshmat View Post
Of course, Richard, if one really wants a boat to go fast on a tight capital-costs budget, one could go to an aircraft wrecking yard and hunt down a worn-out heavy lift helicopter... the 11,240 hp Lotarev D-136 engine used in the Mi-26 comes to mind....
Perfect solution! ten points Matt The passengers you can have in tow then.
__________________
Fortior est qui se quam qui fortissima vincit Moenia.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-11-2009, 03:53 AM
mongo75's Avatar
mongo75 mongo75 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 95 Posts: 258
Location: Orange County California
$300 per hp?? What crazy ass is quoting you this?? I re-built a Chevy 350 for under $750 US, and it pushed my 25' 5000lb Bayliner at 32mph. I would guess it was good for 300hp. I can't afford the rediculous prices that many retailers feel thier parts are worth, so I find used stuff, and rebuild it myself with reliability and cost in mind. SO my Chevy cost me about $2.50 per hp, a helluva lot less than $100 per hp!!
__________________
Danny
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-11-2009, 03:59 AM
mongo75's Avatar
mongo75 mongo75 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 95 Posts: 258
Location: Orange County California
And another thing- unless that $100 per hp you quoted me includes a drive, there's not stinking way it can be that much- I mean hell you can buy a nice GM crate motor for under $6000 RTR, and just bolt on the misc. Marine parts, and you still come in under $9000. So with a little elbow grease, you can save a LOT of money. "MARINIZED" is just a fancy word to get you to throw money away....
__________________
Danny
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-11-2009, 06:10 AM
apex1's Avatar
apex1 apex1 is offline
Steamer
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep: 592 Posts: 2,800
Location: Hamburg
Mongo
there are no marinized MAN engines around, these are Marine Engines by design. And Diesels.
They do´nt compete with these old GM gas guzzlers designed in the 30ies of the last century.
Getting a 25´ on 32kn does´nt mean anything if you´re planning to get a 40´ on 70kn, right?
So compare apples and apples to get called serious.
And, yes the price mentioned included the Arnesons and gear. We pay these prices several times every month (not the Arnesons) and our customers do´nt argue.

Regards
Richard
__________________
Fortior est qui se quam qui fortissima vincit Moenia.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
engine to jet drive montyrosevear Jet Drives 3 04-23-2009 02:57 AM
pp jet drive compatable engine? chappers69 Projects & Proposals 6 01-28-2009 03:56 PM
jet drive and engine for tender ars-technica Jet Drives 7 04-20-2007 10:32 AM
GM engine and drive MDP Propulsion 2 09-13-2006 08:37 PM
Engine and drive unit compatability MaxPower Powerboats 4 05-27-2004 05:35 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin 3 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2009 Boat Design Net