Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion > Inboards
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-19-2008, 07:32 AM
Guest625101138 Guest625101138 is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by navalarchitect View Post
....

Actually, the Owner wants 20knots speed. But, I'm only getting 19 knots for 810HP (2 engines 405 HP each) using 55% overall efficiency.

(Sorry, for my previous post for saying 11.5 knots, I only used 405 HP in my calcs, that's why).
If the props are absorbing 405HP at 20kts then you should be able to get substantially better than 55% efficiency with either 0.6 or 0.8m props. I get open water efficiency of 75% for the 0.8m prop.

I have not done the drag for 20kts as I would need better idea of the detail around the stern to get a good number.

My earlier power figure for 11.5kts would be a bit pessimistic because of the transom drag with the extra draft I needed to compensate for the lack of beam aft. But your numbers are within 2% of mine anyhow.

Getting back to your original question - It is a matter of keeping air out of the prop. I think Atkins designs are best known for their shallow draft and it seems this is what you are trying to achieve. Have a look around for Atkins tunnel hull or box keel. He produced designs with the prop tunnel above the waterline but was careful to seal off air. As soon as prop begins to push water it fills the air void. So it is possible to have the blades above the water level at rest in this design. Also note that bigger diameter props usually equate to higher efficiency so there is an advantage if the flow is to the prop is not too disturbed.

I could only find a small example here:
http://www.atkinboatplans.com/
Take a look at the Nanuk.

Atkins tunnel hulls are discussed on this forum. Your proposal is much bigger than I have seen elsewhere here. The Atkins hulls are very nice. You could do worse than developing along this concept.

I did the linked shape for a much smaller boat based on the Atkins design. It is a single prop but it gives you an idea how the transom overhang shrouds the prop.
http://boatdesign.net/forums/attachm...8&d=1199160374

Rick W.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-19-2008, 09:39 AM
Jango Jango is offline
Senior Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep: 63 Posts: 519
Location: Mid Atlantic
Listing indicated 11.5 kts with 810 HP, I assumed Full Displacement Hull. Using "PropCalc" for a Full Displacement Hull, provides 9.9 Kts with 810 HP and 38 tons. I guess one shouldn't ass u me.

Jango

Last edited by Jango : 02-19-2008 at 02:01 PM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Perfomance issue kck Propulsion 11 06-27-2007 09:08 PM
flywheel issue katzcats Outboards 9 01-04-2007 01:06 AM
cooling issue jjj0923 Powerboats 1 08-09-2006 08:39 AM
Roll Issue cruisers 2420 Powerboats 5 08-08-2006 05:03 PM
NURBS issue suhoi Software 6 08-03-2005 11:15 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net