Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion > Inboards
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2011, 01:45 AM
stringy stringy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 21 Posts: 16
Location: Australia, NSW, Muswellbrook
prop shaft straightness

Hi all.
Just purchased a new propeller shaft for my late 50's ski boat and have several issues, one I am not sure about!

The shaft is 7/8" diameter and 64" long. I just ran it between 2 "V" blocks (59" apart) with a dial indicator and it shows a .012" bend, is this ammount of bend acceptable for a brand new shaft?

Have straightened my old shaft 3 times now to .006" and it seems to bend quit easily hence the new one and keep the old as a spare!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2011, 03:19 AM
CDK's Avatar
CDK CDK is online now
retired engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1425 Posts: 2,253
Location: Adriatic sea
A shaft that long and thin bends easily, .012" or 0.3 mm can be considered straight.

Much more important is the condition of the prop, as even a slight unbalance will cause the end of the shaft to rotate off-center and vibrate.
__________________
Stupidity must be a virtue, whole industries, governments, even economies depend on it......
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2011, 04:22 AM
stringy stringy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 21 Posts: 16
Location: Australia, NSW, Muswellbrook
Ta CDK,

Had my prop refurbished and re-pitched not long ago, just ran my dial indicator over it's od and found one blade 3mm shorter than the other two, a visit to the prop basher is in order, as he obviously had a bad day when he did this one.

The prop is a 12"dia 14"pitch and cupped, 3mm would cause problems would'nt it?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2011, 04:37 AM
mark775
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It is unacceptable. That blade is also likely thicker or larger in some other aspect. I wouldn't give him a second chance. I wouldn't accept the shaft like that either but bear in mind that the heat of your hand touching it can move it more than that - it's not very much, but is "perfect" too much to ask for?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2011, 06:26 PM
stringy stringy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 21 Posts: 16
Location: Australia, NSW, Muswellbrook
Just spoke to the guys I purchased the shaft from and they informed me that the shaft should have a max runout over it's 59" length of .003 to .004, mine is running at .016". I'm sending it back!

Also spoke with the supplier of SS bar in OZ and they informed me that 7/8" was only available in 304 or 316l grades not 431 like I thaught I was being supplied!

So, now I am considering boring out my skeg, replace log gland and bore out drive flange to accomodate a 1" shaft, prop is already 1" with a sleve! There are 2 grades of SS, 431 and 630, both recommended for prop shafts. Which is the best grade material considering corrosion is not an issue?

Last edited by stringy : 03-02-2011 at 06:27 PM. Reason: Don't spell good!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2011, 07:57 PM
Carteret Carteret is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 122 Posts: 107
Location: Eastern NC
Don't forget to lap the propeller taper to the shaft. I have seen several shafts break at the taper because fitting (lapping was never done).
http://www.propellerpages.com/?c=tech_info&f=fitting
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2011, 11:03 PM
stringy stringy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 21 Posts: 16
Location: Australia, NSW, Muswellbrook
Just read the link supplied and have never heard of lapping a propeller to a shaft! Will do this when I get a new shaft sorted. Thank's. About to go home and re-fit my old shaft and prop for the weekend's skiing.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2011, 08:29 AM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1493 Posts: 7,447
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Lapping is the correct way to fit a propeller. It only takes the high spots out. You use valve lapping compound. A badly fitted propeller will vibrate and eventually cause metal fatigue in the shaft.
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-06-2011, 05:42 PM
stringy stringy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 21 Posts: 16
Location: Australia, NSW, Muswellbrook
Thanks for the advice on lapping the prop onto the shaft, did this and it came up good without any work, this prop had been on shaft for the last 2 seasons.

I will machine up a new shaft myself but have one question; there are 2 grades of SS, 431 and 630, both recommended for prop shafts. Which is the best grade material considering corrosion is not an issue?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-06-2011, 06:40 PM
wardd wardd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Rep: 443 Posts: 925
Location: usa
there are 2 ways to look at this

the out of straight condition is .008" which will give you a reading of .016" on your indicator as you rotate the shaft

if you have any out of round condition of the shaft where it rests in the v blocks this will also affect the indicator reading making it appear more or less than it actually is

an out of round condition may not be measurable with a micrometer

the best way to check shaft run out is between centers if the shaft has centers drilled in the ends

if you have a bench long enough you can clamp the centers in the v blocks and clamp the v blocks to the beanch

when using a dial indicator it is best to have it chocked up as close as possible to the vertical rod and to the base and have the probe of the indicator as level as possible and sticking out as straight as possible out of the indicator to limit what is known as cosine error as the probe travels through an arc
__________________
liberty ships were beautiful
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-13-2011, 06:03 AM
stringy stringy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 21 Posts: 16
Location: Australia, NSW, Muswellbrook
Put 3hours on the boat skiing Saturday whilst running my old shaft that had been straightend to .006", also the prop has been sorted and it rattled something terrible! Pulled engine cover and floor and ran at 400rpm, the shaft was visibly bending and moving the shaft gland at least 1/16".

Inspected under the boat this afternoon and can see where the shaft has been working away at the hull below the log 1/8" from where the shaft sits when stationary, hung off the prop nut with a "T" bar, carefull not to bend the shaft but twist and it moved in the direction of the damage!

After some investigation I found a post on this site regarding skeg to prop dimensions, I have a 7/8" shaft with a 2 1/8" gap between!

So;
Purchased a length of 1" 431 SS on Thursday, enough for 2 59" shafts.
Have another old skeg that is 12deg and the base plate is the same size, so will extend toward the prop by 1 1/2" to reduce the unsupported shaft. Also had a look at whip skegs, but will see how it goes with the bigger shaft and extended skeg.

Probably should add, that this boat was originally running about 80hp and is now making about 220hp with a huge increase in torque. The prop has gone from a 12 x 11 uncupped to a 12 x 14 cupped which it will rev to 4500rpm, my self imposed rev limit! I do understand the boats old running gear will have some issues!!!

James
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-14-2011, 08:56 PM
SamSam SamSam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 502 Posts: 1,684
Location: Coastal Georgia
This might help...

http://www.aqualoy.com/shafting.asp
click on
"Shafting data brochure"
About half way down is a formula for calculating shaft sizes.

Maybe going from 80 to 220 hp is the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-14-2011, 10:54 PM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
you do not really have a BEND as such , you have sag, because of the diametre, do you understaand the difference? It matters not whether it is mild steel, high ten or whatever, it is the size of the thing
there are many threads of that subject here, with bearing spacing data for shaft sizes
happy researching me boy
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-15-2011, 07:17 AM
stringy stringy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 21 Posts: 16
Location: Australia, NSW, Muswellbrook
Thanks SamSam for the link, will check with the formulas provided tomorrow! and yes the hp increase has exaggerated the problem with the prop shaft, but this has been the only downside!

Dean, researching away, and no I don't really know what you mean by "sag" in regards to a shaft, just to make sure that the weight of the shaft between centres was not causing the bend I set up the shaft between two centres vertically, with no discernable change!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-15-2011, 08:08 AM
SamSam SamSam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 502 Posts: 1,684
Location: Coastal Georgia
Notice the safety factors in the calculations. Also in the machining of shafts section, the part about keyways and radiused bottom corners of the keyway slot.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prop Shaft Systems. Dhutch Inboards 83 12-13-2009 01:41 AM
Prop shaft inclination amaurer Boat Design 15 10-20-2009 06:00 PM
dual prop shaft ? yipster Propulsion 31 05-21-2005 02:51 PM
Prop Shaft LADYLOVE Propulsion 0 04-30-2005 12:26 PM
Prop shaft vibration sailvayu Boat Design 0 02-21-2003 04:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net