| ||||
|
#16
| ||||
| ||||
| In my opinion the gel has more protection because of material thickness
__________________ m3mm0 SR ib http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kwlNk7-iSg |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| How much is the difference actually? Gelcoat is something like 1 kg/m2 for boats (how much for dinghies?). What is the weight of the needed filler + paint to get a smooth surface and enough protection? |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
.
__________________ Making beautiful boats is a passion never a chore ! |
|
#19
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
for 25-30 ft boat skin thickness could be 4-5mm, lets say 4. than 1 m2 weight will be: 1500*0.004=6kg/m2. +1kg/m2 of gelcoat is 1/6=17% - huge addition. even 0.5kg/m2 is 8% - still very much extra weight. 0.25kg/m2 =4% - still something to think about. For small dinghies thickness will be even less, I don't recall now skin thickness of an Optimist, something ~2-3mm come to mind. And we do not even mention modern sandwich panels, let alone high-tech fibres in them, allowing much less structural weight. According to those weight calculations, it turns out that main reason for universal use of gelcoat is low cost in production.
__________________ All the stresses in my designs are 95% of permissible. |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#21
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
When working from good female moulds, skipping the gelcoat will mean significant weight saving at cost of painting it (labor + materials). Apparently, not many clients ever ask for this option today .
__________________ All the stresses in my designs are 95% of permissible. |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| Yes, I know you talk about new boats, but I didn't find any specs for new boat paintings. So how much filler + paint is needed? And why would you need less than for a repair? |
|
#23
| ||||
| ||||
| As new boats are normally built in female moulds, the surface is already smooth. If gelcoat is skipped, only paint needs to be added. _________________________ As to osmosis repairs, before adding 1kg/m2 of material, quite a thickness of old, waterlogged, damaged material is removed, so weight wise it could break even.
__________________ All the stresses in my designs are 95% of permissible. |
|
#24
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I have done this on smaller components that I have moulds for with great success, see no reason why it wouldn't work on larger components. |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
I used to do this a lot a long time ago !! Its the thinnest coat you can possibly get to keep the glass away from the moulds surface !! ![]()
__________________ Making beautiful boats is a passion never a chore ! |
|
#26
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
4-5 mm is extremely thick and I would only recommend it in combination with chopper spray method: because the result will be **** in any case. |
|
#27
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
You do prime before topcoat don't you? Quote:
I thought that stuff had gone the way of the ![]() |
|
#28
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
CSM in UP building is still an option. Especially as first layer after gelcoat it helps to prevent print-through due to curing shrinkage. There is also 30 or 60 g/m2 on the market. |
|
#29
| ||||
| ||||
| I use CC24, it is both http://www.ppgpmc.com.au/docs/0024%2...20May%2008.pdf Quote:
|
|
#30
| |||
| |||
| From what I have understood, finish type do affect overall weight, and so performances. Assuming high performance, you are building with vinylester or epoxy resin. 1) Epoxy resin. You will have bonding problems with polyester based gel coat and epoxy. So, you will need a vinylester skin coat , hand wetted, between gel coat and epoxy for resin compatibility and bonding. So you will have to compare gelcoat weight + skin coat weight (hand wetted CSM is something rather heavy) vs paint + minimal finish on epoxy. Epoxy does not retract on curing, so finish from the mold may be pretty good and need very little fairing. 2)Vinylester resin. Gelcoat has a good bonding with vinylester. The problem of is that vinylester will retract curing, giving print thru aspect. You will also need a skin coat between gelcoat and structural layer, to avoid this print thru effect. So , in this case, you will have to compare gelcoat + skin coat weight against paint + some finish to fill the print thru aspect (more than with epoxy). NB the skin coat is something between 2 * 225gr/mē or 225gr/mē + 450 gr/mē CSM hand wetted (not infused). That can be catastrophically heavy when compared to 600 or 800 gr/mē infused biaxial of a sandwich skin. gelcoat + 225gr CSM + 450 gr CSM is around 3kg/mē. Something not to forget. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| golden V'S club shamrock | wildwords | Sailboats | 43 | Today 02:47 AM |
| help with painted stripping | rrrwel | Materials | 1 | 01-27-2010 07:24 AM |
| Maxsurf/workshop V's Autoship | alidesigner | Software | 0 | 11-27-2009 09:11 PM |
| Cold moulded Brazilian cedar V's E glass and Vinylester | willfox | Sailboats | 15 | 09-28-2009 11:07 PM |
| Painted gellcoat ??? | turbo2256b | Materials | 0 | 01-28-2007 08:17 PM |