Deleted Post

[bistros]

Originally Posted by Paul B

Congrats Gary.

Regardless of your protest you will be mentioned on message boards for the next 5 years or so, with comments about how you are one of the "many" building a boat to this non-existent rule.

Careful Paul - ice is getting thin - a very similar post of mine disappeared without a trace.

--
Bill

[Jeff]

To be fair, the reported post I removed of yours Bistros contained the following:

It isn't worth trying to get (removed) to be honest - he's incapable of it

This does appear to be calling another member a liar, which is definitely against the forum rules (attacking another member.)
I have not deleted above-board replies which look at the facts rather than attacking a person.

[Paul B]

Originally Posted by Jeff

To be fair, the reported post I removed of yours Bistros contained the following:

This does appear to be calling another member a liar, which is definitely against the forum rules (attacking another member.)
I have not deleted above-board replies which look at the facts rather than attacking a person.

Is it "attacking" a member to point out he is a liar if in fact he is a liar?

If not, then people can feel free to lie about anything they want, knowing if they are called on it then a quick note to the moderator complaining they are being called a liar will have the actual facts removed while their initial lie still stands.

[Jeff]

I think "the actual facts" can be posted without attacking anyone or saying "he's incapable of 'being honest'".