Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Construction > Boatbuilding > Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:19 PM
fiberglass jack fiberglass jack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 95 Posts: 462
Location: toronto
who knows boston whalers

anyone know what the foam in the whalers is , will it absorb water?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2006, 12:18 AM
ondarvr ondarvr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 288 Posts: 662
Location: Monroe WA
It's the same type of foam everybody else uses, and yes, it will absorb water.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2006, 09:43 PM
BETTY-B BETTY-B is offline
Expert professional
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 6
Location: Port Townsend,WA
Polyurethane TDI,3
Here is the most info I have found on this very subject. By far more info than you will ever get from even BW:
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001747.html
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-20-2006, 07:03 AM
dereksireci's Avatar
dereksireci dereksireci is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Rep: 37 Posts: 163
Location: South Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondarvr View Post
It's the same type of foam everybody else uses, and yes, it will absorb water.
I wonder what information you base such broad statements on. The foam in a Whaler depends on when it was made. The chemical makeup and application procedure have changed over the years.

djs
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-20-2006, 02:46 PM
BETTY-B BETTY-B is offline
Expert professional
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 6
Location: Port Townsend,WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereksireci View Post
I wonder what information you base such broad statements on. The foam in a Whaler depends on when it was made. The chemical makeup and application procedure have changed over the years.

djs
Where are you getting your info from? I would love to see an exact reference to this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-20-2006, 05:45 PM
buckknekkid's Avatar
buckknekkid buckknekkid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep: 37 Posts: 345
Location: north of pompano
it was an article in Professional Boat builder. Explained how one of the originators developed the system, then left to start his own company and continued developing his methodology.
__________________
Can anyone spare any gas today for a hamburger on Friday ???
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-20-2006, 06:15 PM
ondarvr ondarvr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 288 Posts: 662
Location: Monroe WA
For the most part, 2 part, 2lb CG approved foam is about the same as it's always been, there are a few ingrediants that have been changed to make them less toxic, but they haven't changed all that much. They are about 95% closed cell when done correctly, correct mix, temp and application, so to start with 5% of it could absorb water (not likely though), if any of the these steps are not done correctly then the % of closed cells can go down, or the cure may not be complete. There is no real strength in this type of 2lb foam, so after it's in the boat, the stress of pounding through waves and getting beat up on the trailer, some areas may (will) get crushed, now there are even more open cells, the more flex in the boat the more cells will fail, it will then absorb more water, get heavier, flex more, crush more cells and absorb even more water.

One problem you run into when doing a repair below the water line on a BW (not just BWs) is stopping the slow flow of water draining out of the foam.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2006, 07:20 PM
dereksireci's Avatar
dereksireci dereksireci is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Rep: 37 Posts: 163
Location: South Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by BETTY-B View Post
Where are you getting your info from? I would love to see an exact reference to this.

Mr Expert Professional,


My reference is my eyeballs while working at Whaler PD&E. The technology of isocyanate foams has changed since the days of somebody mixing up part A and part B in a big blue barrel on top of the hull and liner molds. There have been water blown foams and other formulations. It has been driven by regulatory changes or the threat of changes.

djs
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-20-2006, 07:37 PM
ondarvr ondarvr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 288 Posts: 662
Location: Monroe WA
I agree the formulas have changed some, but I haven't seen a big difference in the performace of the foam itself, those changes have been taking place for around ten years.
I must say I haven't repaired a BW in many years (I don't repair that many boats anymore), but if they are using the same, or similar foam as other boat companies, then water logged foam is still an issue.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mako vs. Boston Whaler lemccoy Powerboats 3 06-18-2006 02:44 AM
Grady White Boston Whaler vs. SeaSwirl / Proline blee Powerboats 3 03-25-2005 09:13 PM
Overpowering an 11'4" Boston Whaler Sonie Powerboats 5 07-17-2004 02:15 PM
FS: Nantucket Sea Sled (Boston Whaler) molds cpeavey Marketplace 2 05-01-2004 09:47 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net