Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Construction > Boatbuilding > Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-02-2009, 07:19 PM
singlescull singlescull is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: New Zealand
yea i can buy a boat for 10k. i dont mind if the boat comes out 18kg or so. there is a 25 year old german boat at our rowing club and that is about 16kg.
do you think 2mm coremat is a good idea they say it uses around 1kg of resin per m2 so it would be stronger than foam but much heaver?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-02-2009, 07:30 PM
Guest625101138 Guest625101138 is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by singlescull View Post
..
do you think 2mm coremat is a good idea they say it uses around 1kg of resin per m2 so it would be stronger than foam but much heaver?
I have not used it but anything that gets thickness for less weight than glass is suitable for a spacer providing it has some shear strength.

One issue with any core is ensuring it conforms nicely to the shape. The 3mm Klegecell can be heat formed but it cannot conform to a compound curve. It has to be cut into pieces. I do not know how well coremat will conform to curves.

Rick W
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-02-2009, 07:33 PM
singlescull singlescull is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: New Zealand
yea apparently this stuff is real easy to form once wetted out. I can get it for $11 m2.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-02-2009, 08:18 PM
Guest625101138 Guest625101138 is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
With any layup that you have not used before it is worth the effort of doing a test. Make measurement of the amount of resin used in the test so you can mix the right quantity for the full mould.

Also allow to cure properly. A couple of days in the sun is good. The epoxies I have used all get some level of amine blush - it will be an issue for fitting bulkheads so needs to be cleaned off before epoxying bulkheads. Unless you know about amine blush you think there is a problem with the curing. The degree of oiliness increases with the humidity.

In fact I use 25mm thick blue foam for bulkheads and glue in place with a water curing polyurethane glue. It gives slight expansion as well. However the blush still has to be cleaned off.

After the test piece has cured load it to measure the stiffness and then take it to destruction to see what fails and where. Also check for any voids. You can bet with a curved mould you will get more voids in the full hull than a test piece so it gives an idea of how well you need to set up for vacuum bagging.

Rick W
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-02-2009, 08:22 PM
Guest625101138 Guest625101138 is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
The most important aspect for the test piece of course is the weight so you can do a better estimate of the the final hull weight. However it is easy to underestimate all the little things that go into a working boat like a bit of reinforcing here and there; a mounting point or two, a little rudder tube and so on. All adds up.

Rick W
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-03-2009, 02:31 PM
Herman's Avatar
Herman Herman is offline
Resininfusion.info
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rep: 987 Posts: 1,178
Location: The Netherlands
Working clean helps in that respect. (keeping weight down)

About amine blush: 10:1 water : ammonia solution works very well to remove it.

Make some test panels. One thing not to worry about: The coremat will conform to your shape with ease.
The 1000 gr/m2 might be a bit optimistic for the coremat. Do a panel with 3mm PVC foam as well, to see what the differences are.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-03-2009, 06:59 PM
singlescull singlescull is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: New Zealand
i have been looking at cores and now think foam is proberly a better idea.
is it possible to have a core too thick?
i have found a quite lightweight 10mm polyurathane foam
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-04-2009, 04:08 AM
singlescull singlescull is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: New Zealand
after some research i found that polyurethane degrades over time so scrap that. i finaly found a new zealand supplier of 8mm honeycomb and am waiting for a quote. hopefully it wont cost an arm and leg.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-04-2009, 04:54 AM
Herman's Avatar
Herman Herman is offline
Resininfusion.info
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rep: 987 Posts: 1,178
Location: The Netherlands
I hope so, it is quite expensive, and it has a learning curve, so produce and destroy some samples first. Luckily a scull does not eat up that much honeycomb.

PU foam is crap. Good for insulation though, so it has a use in boating: For DIY refrigerators only...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-04-2009, 05:32 AM
singlescull singlescull is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: New Zealand
yea 4m2 will easly do it. it will only need one join in the middle. i hope it is quite easy to work with bending into curvs and such.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-04-2009, 06:29 AM
mark775
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So Rick, You get these flat bottom things on plane? Could a strong rower maintain plane through the glide?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-04-2009, 07:53 AM
apex1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Coremat XI is about 12€, Aramid paper honeycomb 1,5mm is about 26€ m² in W.Europe.

Richard
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-08-2009, 02:53 AM
Guest625101138 Guest625101138 is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark775 View Post
So Rick, You get these flat bottom things on plane? Could a strong rower maintain plane through the glide?
Mark
I can get mine to lift as opposed to sinking that you see with typical low rocker rounded hull. They are not on the plane but are starting to lift. I think a strong cyclist might get enough lift to say they are planing. This would be in sprinting at about 1000W.

With rowing the drive is too variable to maintain the steady lift. In rowing they would rise and fall at very high power stroking but typically a strong rower only maintains about 500W so there would not be a lot of lift. However it would lift and would be better than sinking.

Rick
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transom - dual to single ian_upton Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 9 02-01-2011 07:26 PM
Single or twins??? clint F Outboards 4 06-09-2009 08:56 PM
single sailing bill coleman Boat Design 63 02-19-2009 08:46 AM
Scull Design and Solidworks? Thrmaln Software 5 09-01-2006 04:47 AM
Single Scull Diagrams?? Cory Boden Boat Design 2 10-24-2004 01:04 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net