Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion > DIY Marinizing
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-2007, 04:44 PM
YOSHIBG YOSHIBG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: CORSICANA,TX
Retrofitting 6.75hp Briggs To Sea King Lower

Hello All, This Is My First Post, Hope It Works Ok. I Have An Old 7 Hp Montgomery Wards Sea King That The Powerhead Is Bad. I Want To Replace It With A 6.75hp Briggs Vertical I Have. I Hope Someone Can Help Guide Me. How Would I Hook Up Some Sort Of Centrifugal Clutch Between The Shafts So As To Not Be Direct Driven? It Appeares My Only Option Is To Have One Custom Made For $150.00, Which Defeats The Purpose. Any Help Would Be Appreciated...
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-25-2007, 06:11 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
If you can put a pulley on the prop shaft down, and one on the engine, offset by a couple of inches, you could have an idler pulley with a lever (pulley inside the belt, not outside, otherwise can't have shafts close enough).
use a spring to force the idler into neutral, and a notch in the lever to catch a detent and hold in forward. Make detent adjustable.
The belt will act as a clutch, will cost a few dollars, pulleys won't be much either, will allow different ratios to be tried out (Briggs will be higher torque, lower RPM than original).
I picture a pair of plates, 1/4"-3/8" aluminum, one to mount to engine, one to lower unit, with maybe an inch and a half between them, spacers between with bolts inside them holding the plates on. The pulleys and idler go between, with idler pivot and arm also between. All drill press and table saw work, and maybe a couple of square feet of aluminum.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-25-2007, 06:52 PM
YOSHIBG YOSHIBG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: CORSICANA,TX
That Sounds Good

What About The Same Setup But With Some Sort Of Centrifugal Clutch (say Off A Go-cart Set Up)? Would That Work? How Would I Know About What Rpm's The Clutch Engaged?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-25-2007, 08:06 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
The clutch will work of course, and without the idler, it's simpler. Can you save the one it had? RPM is what engages the clutch, regardless of power. Chain can be used (but a belt is cleaner). The clutch of any four stroke Briggs should be based on 3600 RPM governed redline. Your engine will accept any clutch with (is this right?) a 3/4" shaft that came off a 4 stroke flathead and possibly some OHV models (though I think they go higher--- but still should work.
You can change the springs in the clutch too, easily.
Those clutches must engage at around 1000 RPM, just a guess. Disadvantage against idler/belt is you can't putt-putt, which gives amazing fuel economy and surprising speed depending on hull type.
Another issue is the prop, which is designed for higher RPMs, maybe 5000?
Rather than change it, figure the difference between the designed RPM and the 3600 of the Briggs. My guess is you want to speed it up by at least 1.5.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2007, 09:13 PM
TerryKing's Avatar
TerryKing TerryKing is offline
On the Red Sea!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 278 Posts: 581
Location: King Abdullah University of Science & Technology - Near Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOSHIBG View Post
... I Have An Old 7 Hp Montgomery Wards Sea King That The Powerhead Is Bad. I Want To Replace It With A 6.75hp Briggs Vertical I Have. .
Alan has given you some good perspective...

Question: What did the original engine have??? Forward-neutral-reverse, or just "start and Run"??
__________________
Regards, Terry King ...On the Red Sea at KAUST
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2007, 05:05 PM
YOSHIBG YOSHIBG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: CORSICANA,TX
The Original Engine Had

Only Forward, And Some Sort Of Inline Clutch, That Doesn't Work Anymore. To Be Completely Honest, It Never Ran For Me, It May Have Been Direct Driven. I'm Thinking Of Going The Centrifugal Clutch Route, Belt Driven - Only Now I Have To Determine What Size Pulley To Put On The Lower Unit Shaft To Have The Correct Ratio. This Is Confusing For Me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2007, 05:27 PM
YOSHIBG YOSHIBG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: CORSICANA,TX
Ok I Just Looked...

It Had Forward And Neutral, To Put It In Forward, Had To Pull A Lever, That Apparently Engaged It Into Forward Somehow...does This Help? Clinton Engine Model # K7002107a
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-26-2007, 06:07 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
No kidding--- a Clinton. There's an old name. Clinton made a lot of two cycle engines way back. The lower unit pulley might want to be half the size of the engine pulley. I used to rebuild them as a teen and run them on all kinds of contraptions.
There will be someone here who is good with props. The prop should be marked with two numbers. find the numbers and hen see how many turns of the lower unit shaft equal one turn of the prop. With that, and the 3600 RPM engine max, we should arrive at the right pulley sizes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-26-2007, 06:58 PM
TerryKing's Avatar
TerryKing TerryKing is offline
On the Red Sea!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 278 Posts: 581
Location: King Abdullah University of Science & Technology - Near Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
It HAD a clutch??

Quote:
Originally Posted by YOSHIBG View Post
It Had Forward And Neutral, To Put It In Forward, Had To Pull A Lever, That Apparently Engaged It Into Forward Somehow...does This Help? Clinton Engine Model # K7002107a
So it had a 'clutch', probably a typical outboard 'dog clutch' which is OK because of the propeller slip.

So maybe you don't NEED a clutch, especially as you can probably idle even lower than the original....
__________________
Regards, Terry King ...On the Red Sea at KAUST
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-26-2007, 07:35 PM
YOSHIBG YOSHIBG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: CORSICANA,TX
Is There A Way To Post Pictures Here

If So I Can Post A Pic Of The "clutch" And Let You Guys See It...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-26-2007, 07:49 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
True, if there's a clutch, it might be functional. However, once the ratio is changed to speed up the lower unit shaft, the clutch will again work at the same speed--- that is if you increase the speed by pulleys, which makes sense given a two cycle is a much higher RPM engine than a four cycle.
I'm imagining a dog clutch now, never having seen one. I imagine two arms held in by springs on fixed pivots. The end of each arm has a semi-circular knob that goes outward at a certain threshold RPM. Around this, a drum has a scalloped inner surface. There is also a rubber damper built in between two parts that interlock like a typical shaft coupler. The rubber takes up the shock of engagement enough to soft-start the shaft to the prop.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-27-2007, 12:16 AM
YOSHIBG YOSHIBG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: CORSICANA,TX
Here Are Some Pics...

Of The Clutch - I Think It's Not As Complicated As Some May Thing. Really, It May Just Be A Shaft Adapter...
Attached Thumbnails
Retrofitting 6.75hp Briggs To Sea King Lower-outboard-parts-002.jpg  Retrofitting 6.75hp Briggs To Sea King Lower-outboard-parts-003.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-27-2007, 12:19 AM
YOSHIBG YOSHIBG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: CORSICANA,TX
Oh, I Forgot To Add. There Are No Numbers On The Prop - But 1 1/2 Turns On The Shaft Equals One Turn Of The Prop
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-27-2007, 03:03 AM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
Not what I expected. A shaft coupling wouldn't have a square hole in the side with what looks like a nub with a shiny surface inside.. Must be a very simple clutch, but looks a bit dry/corroded. Should be self-explanatory, once free and lubed.

where's Terry?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-27-2007, 12:24 PM
YOSHIBG YOSHIBG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: CORSICANA,TX
Let Me Tell You More

About This "clutch". If You Try To Spin It Counter Clockwise, Holding The Top And Bottom, Only The Top Spins. Clockwise, The Entire Thing Spins, Which Is The Correct Direction To Go Forward. The Little Nub, I Don't Know What That Is, I Want To Take It Apart, But Can't Figure Out How Without Tearing It Up. Some One With Some Knowledge Of The Montgomery Ward Sea Kings Would Be Very Helpful.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glass Sea King 58king Powerboats 2 01-19-2007 01:09 AM
1962 75hp Johnson Electramatic GJF237 Outboards 2 01-11-2007 07:01 PM
Retrofitting for a small fireboat apagafuego Boat Design 7 07-07-2006 09:01 AM
Adding 18 Horse Briggs To Lower Unit BEGNO DIY Marinizing 12 03-07-2005 07:37 PM
King StarBoard duluthboats Materials 5 09-16-2004 01:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net