Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion > DIY Marinizing
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2011, 06:18 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
performance calculation

hi everyone. can anyone on the forum do a calculation for me. moderate v 26 foot planing cruiser approximatley 3.8 metric tons, twin diesel 75 hp engines 1-1 borgwarners, prop size unknown. i am after a rough idea of prop sizes i need and what speed to expect. i am hoping for about 14 knots.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-15-2011, 07:04 AM
daiquiri's Avatar
daiquiri daiquiri is offline
Engineering and Design
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 2574 Posts: 2,731
Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)
Is it a production boat? If it is, the best thing would be to contact the manufacturer. You can get some blind guesses here, but each will be different from another because based on assumptions, and will cost you $$ if wrong.
Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2011, 07:10 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by daiquiri View Post
Is it a production boat? If it is, the best thing would be to contact the manufacturer. You can get some blind guesses here, but each will be different from another because based on assumptions, and will cost you $$ if wrong.
Cheers!
thanks for the reply. yes it is a production boat but the factory is not in business any more. i am just looking for a rough idea on what to expect. there might even be someone on the forum with a similar spec boat.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2011, 07:14 AM
daiquiri's Avatar
daiquiri daiquiri is offline
Engineering and Design
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 2574 Posts: 2,731
Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)
Ok, I see. Then how about posting some more data, like model name, waterline length and beam, is 3.8 tons full or empty weight, how big fuel and water tanks are, how many persons on board ets? Does it have inboard or outboard engines? What props does it have now and what speed do you get with them?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2011, 03:13 AM
CDK's Avatar
CDK CDK is offline
retired engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1425 Posts: 2,252
Location: Adriatic sea
Sorry to disappoint you Whitepointer23, 14 kt is no planing speed for a 26 ft hull.
With twin 75 hp you can achieve 14 kt as a top speed, still in displacement and with almost 60 ltr/hour fuel consumption,

To reach stable planing speed at 22 knots you need an additional 50 hp to get over the hump, then you can throttle back to approx. 80% power.

And your boat should go on a diet, with 3.8 tonnes it is overweight.
__________________
Stupidity must be a virtue, whole industries, governments, even economies depend on it......
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2011, 03:33 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDK View Post
Sorry to disappoint you Whitepointer23, 14 kt is no planing speed for a 26 ft hull.
With twin 75 hp you can achieve 14 kt as a top speed, still in displacement and with almost 60 ltr/hour fuel consumption,

To reach stable planing speed at 22 knots you need an additional 50 hp to get over the hump, then you can throttle back to approx. 80% power.

And your boat should go on a diet, with 3.8 tonnes it is overweight.
thanks for the reply. the weight is an estimate, i wanted to make it higher rather than understate it. i don't agree with 22 knots being planing speed, this style of boat planes at 11 to 12 knots, 10 with the tabs right down, you may be thinking of stern drives with the weight in the back. i have also been told that it won't cruise at 8 knots, it does that easily, the inboard lay out is very well balanced.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2011, 03:42 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
i had another boat that was a similar design but 24 ft long, i removed a stern drive from that one and made a prop tunnel and fitted a 453 detroit 165 hp, it had a top speed of 22 knots and cruised at 14 knots on 11 liters per hour, that is why i question what you are saying. the speeds were on gps not guess work, the boat weighed 2.7 metric ton and the fuel was measured by filling tank after each trip and hour meter readings and trip time off gps. this boat was harder to get on the plane due to loss of bouyancy with the tunnel.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2011, 03:52 AM
daiquiri's Avatar
daiquiri daiquiri is offline
Engineering and Design
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 2574 Posts: 2,731
Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)
It sounds to me like your boat's specifications are similar to Tom Lathorpe's Bluejacket: http://www.bluejacketboats.com/bluejacket_25_5.htm
Though 3.8 tons is a bit higher figure, the other numbers fit well (imho) into Bluejacket's range.

Tom is a member of this forum ( http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/profile/tom28571.html ) and you can contact him directly and ask for his opinion. He is a polite and experienced person, and knows his boats well. I'm sure he'll be able to give a close estimate to numbers you're looking for.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2011, 04:18 AM
CDK's Avatar
CDK CDK is offline
retired engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1425 Posts: 2,252
Location: Adriatic sea
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitepointer23 View Post
thanks for the reply. the weight is an estimate, i wanted to make it higher rather than understate it. i don't agree with 22 knots being planing speed, this style of boat planes at 11 to 12 knots, 10 with the tabs right down, you may be thinking of stern drives with the weight in the back. i have also been told that it won't cruise at 8 knots, it does that easily, the inboard lay out is very well balanced.
I didn't think of stern drives, just the weight to hull surface ratio.
My boat has roughly the same length, weight and horse power. The hull has been extended to 26 ft., at 14 knots it needs full throttle. Once it had more powerful gas engines and could plane at speeds between 22 and 32 knots.
The attached graph shows the calculated engine torque vs. speed. Where the torque drops, planing speed is achieved.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Draco_Engine_Torque.pdf (31.6 KB, 50 views)
__________________
Stupidity must be a virtue, whole industries, governments, even economies depend on it......
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2011, 05:55 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by daiquiri View Post
It sounds to me like your boat's specifications are similar to Tom Lathorpe's Bluejacket: http://www.bluejacketboats.com/bluejacket_25_5.htm
Though 3.8 tons is a bit higher figure, the other numbers fit well (imho) into Bluejacket's range.

Tom is a member of this forum ( http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/profile/tom28571.html ) and you can contact him directly and ask for his opinion. He is a polite and experienced person, and knows his boats well. I'm sure he'll be able to give a close estimate to numbers you're looking for.

Cheers
thanks for the link, nice looking designs, i will have a good look tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-16-2011, 06:03 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDK View Post
I didn't think of stern drives, just the weight to hull surface ratio.
My boat has roughly the same length, weight and horse power. The hull has been extended to 26 ft., at 14 knots it needs full throttle. Once it had more powerful gas engines and could plane at speeds between 22 and 32 knots.
The attached graph shows the calculated engine torque vs. speed. Where the torque drops, planing speed is achieved.
i looked at the graph and can see what you mean, but it is different to what i have found in my boats. next time i slip the boat i will send you photos of the hull. the v is quite moderate as was the other boat i mentioned , i think this could be the reason we have different results. i don't know how many degrees deadrise i have but if you compare it to a bertram 25 it has a lot less v.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-18-2011, 05:01 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDK View Post
Sorry to disappoint you Whitepointer23, 14 kt is no planing speed for a 26 ft hull.
With twin 75 hp you can achieve 14 kt as a top speed, still in displacement and with almost 60 ltr/hour fuel consumption,

To reach stable planing speed at 22 knots you need an additional 50 hp to get over the hump, then you can throttle back to approx. 80% power.

And your boat should go on a diet, with 3.8 tonnes it is overweight.
apology's cdk, i had a prop manufacturer run my figures through there computer today and that came up with a top speed of 10 knots, so your conclusions aren't far off there's. i only wish i knew as much as i think i do. the 2h diesels i was going to use would have been ideal but when i measured the boat they were to high. if i can cruise at 8 or 9 knots i will be happy so i will go ahead with the 4 cylinders. another interesting thing they told me was my boat weighs 4.5 metric ton.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-18-2011, 07:00 AM
CDK's Avatar
CDK CDK is offline
retired engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1425 Posts: 2,252
Location: Adriatic sea
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitepointer23 View Post
another interesting thing they told me was my boat weighs 4.5 metric ton.
Quite unusual for this hull length. Is there lead somewhere, depleted uranium or concrete spiced with bolts and nuts?
__________________
Stupidity must be a virtue, whole industries, governments, even economies depend on it......
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-18-2011, 08:36 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
yes it does sound heavy, these boats were built in the 70's when more glass meant more strength. probably the reason they are still sought after, they last for ever, you just keep repowering them. if you add up 2 v8's, 400 lt petrol. 250 water. hot water heater, there's 1.5 ton. so the boat must 2.5-3 ton on its own. i would have thought 1.5 for the boat on its own. it is the second time i have been told it weighs 4.5.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculation naupigos_gr Stability 9 06-04-2010 05:08 AM
Resistance calculation and propulsion calculation for tug boat sreejith Props 0 02-06-2010 03:43 AM
powering calculation sandeep Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 6 01-31-2010 05:42 PM
regarding foundation calculation... sreenath00 Materials 3 05-28-2009 11:00 PM
Calculation of GM Shidoran Boatbuilding 14 04-25-2006 03:19 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net