Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion > Diesel Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: What do you consider as the best propulsion engine within 130-160 kW range? Vote!
John Deere 25 41.67%
Iveco 5 8.33%
Deutz 6 10.00%
Volvo Penta 8 13.33%
Yanmar 16 26.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #76  
Old 02-26-2011, 12:18 PM
scotch&water scotch&water is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Rep: 51 Posts: 46
Location: Great Falls Mt. USA
THe engine you are looking for is the 3.9 Cummins hp 100 t0 150 old mech. pump lots of them out ther rebuild and new, is 4 cyl from the older 12 valve 5.9 so lots of parts.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 02-26-2011, 01:13 PM
michael pierzga michael pierzga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 670 Posts: 2,457
Location: spain
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCat View Post
So true. The question is pretty clueless. As bad as 'What's the best boat?' Best for what?

Cummins, for example, produces engines rated only for a short lifetime on yachts and engines rated for a long lifetime in commercial use. Lots of manufacturers do this. In a commercial engine, or a voyaging yacht, I'd go with a derated Deere engine.
Huh ????? Ive got a Cummins diesel with 10,000 hours of seawater,hard marine use. . Indestructible. Marine diesel engines suffer from poor ownership...not poor design.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 02-26-2011, 01:22 PM
mark775
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
He's saying they make a sport version, Michael, which extracts too much HP. Yes, Cummins are good engines. I don't want to get into this too much without reading all the posts but JD doesn't yet have the infrastructure to be a good alternative, IMO. I had a friend that bought one from Cascade, in Seattle. He then said he needed a front pulley group for a hydraulic pump or washdown, and they said "Huh?" That would never happen with Cat, Volvo, Cummins, etc.. It's already been done with them, with a part number and a location of the nearest unit - ("It'll be at your boat on Monday")

Last edited by mark775 : 03-04-2011 at 10:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 02-26-2011, 01:46 PM
michael pierzga michael pierzga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 670 Posts: 2,457
Location: spain
Whats interesting is that the original poster didn't list Cat.....MTU or Cummins... all quality marine grade engines.

As for John Deer, people always speak highly of the engines. Im not
familiar with the marinization of John Deer. When talking service, its almost always the components like heat exchangers, exhaust and pumps on any engine that needs the most service per hour run .
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 02-26-2011, 06:02 PM
Pirate68 Pirate68 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rep: 10 Posts: 4
Location: Nelson Bay
Detroit rulz

Cheap parts
easy fitting
basic design
great sound
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 03-04-2011, 09:54 PM
SeaJay SeaJay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 112 Posts: 211
Location: Sacramento
Quatsino - take a look at the Beta engines (Kubotas). The 75 is naturally aspirated and the 90 used to be but I think they had to add a turbo to meet air quality issues and it is now 105.

http://www.betamarinenc.com/bv3300.htm
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 03-05-2011, 06:30 AM
FAST FRED FAST FRED is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 756 Posts: 3,328
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big dock & room for O'nite stop .
For folks that can not see that much difference between brand A and brand B diesel, I suggest you go to the parts source and price common items.

Water pump, cylinder head , re build kit.

Some will be 500% more than others.

FF
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 03-31-2011, 03:58 AM
SPARK1 SPARK1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 9
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
I see that John Deere is winning the pole. Which JD engine and why?
I presume it will be 6068 but which version?
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 04-01-2011, 05:12 AM
FAST FRED FAST FRED is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 756 Posts: 3,328
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big dock & room for O'nite stop .
Many folks like Deere because the engines can be obtained at the JD farm store , instead of the "JD marine folks" at very good prices.

At least 2x a year the farm folks will offer factory warenteed rebuilt , with NO core required !!!


This is a fantastic deal .

Keel cooled , dry stack requires no "marine" conversion , just a used TD to be underway at 1/3 the cost of the"marine" guys.

Aftermarket wet exhaust manifolds are avialable if needed for a yachtty wet exhaust.

FF
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 05-08-2011, 01:49 AM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
can you add Cummins to this poll, By far the biggest independent eng manufacturer and by the way you left out Cat MWM Man and a whole raft of real engines that are not hand grenade rated
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 05-08-2011, 02:00 AM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAST FRED View Post
Many folks like Deere because the engines can be obtained at the JD farm store , instead of the "JD marine folks" at very good prices.

At least 2x a year the farm folks will offer factory warenteed rebuilt , with NO core required !!!


This is a fantastic deal .

Keel cooled , dry stack requires no "marine" conversion , just a used TD to be underway at 1/3 the cost of the"marine" guys.

Aftermarket wet exhaust manifolds are avialable if needed for a yachtty wet exhaust.

FF
yes I like Deere too, but their install dwgs are woeful and they have tractor eng mt positions low on bloc which lifts the engine so high makes it a bastard to fit under e/r sole
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 05-08-2011, 03:08 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
have a look at gardner, parts are still available, no make of engine can match them for quality and fuel economy. they were so good they put themselves out of business. the only parts ever required are filters. a trawler i used to go out on ran a 6 cyl gardner for 48 years before it was rebuilt. 60,000 hours plus is not uncommon.
__________________
brendan .
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 05-08-2011, 04:10 AM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitepointer23 View Post
have a look at gardner, parts are still available, no make of engine can match them for quality and fuel economy. they were so good they put themselves out of business. the only parts ever required are filters. a trawler i used to go out on ran a 6 cyl gardner for 48 years before it was rebuilt. 60,000 hours plus is not uncommon.
My dear Boy
I was working on Gardeners before you were a gleam in your Dads eye
they are Passe. old hat , power to weight abysmal
So long Lister, Lister Blackstone, Kelvin, Ruston, Gleniffer, all great in their day
modern day engines are better, stronger and more efficient
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 05-08-2011, 05:24 AM
bernd1972 bernd1972 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 88 Posts: 62
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
I would suggest Perkins which is the same as the small Cats.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 05-08-2011, 05:37 AM
Icebreaker Icebreaker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rep: 11 Posts: 10
Location: Thailand
Because the poll limited the order of preference _ I would have chosen John Deere reluctantly.
Otherwise # Gardenor
# Isuzu
NON turbos good output at around -2,000 RPM
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Converting I/O engine to inboard? Dave B Inboards 14 04-06-2012 05:38 AM
An inboard propulsion 3.5 m planing boat is it possible?? jx85 Boat Design 13 02-18-2009 10:34 AM
Inboard Engine to Automobile Engine Conversion ?'s Stingray230 Gas Engines 2 09-26-2007 06:04 PM
Replacing an outboard engine with an inboard engine boere Sailboats 1 09-16-2005 07:49 AM
Replacing an outboard engine with an inboard engine boere Boatbuilding 0 06-23-2003 04:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net