| ||||
|
#16
| ||||
| ||||
| CGN, please see my reply in the other thread entitled "Savitsky Power Prediction". Ta.
__________________ Dingo Tweedie |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| I want to study about occurance and probability of porpoising in planning boat. I would compare between extant methods. Is there any one to help me by some refrences? |
|
#18
| ||||
| ||||
| "For a given deadrise angle there is a specific relationship between trim angle and lift coefficient which defines the inception of porpoising. Because of such porpoise considerations it is necessary to design the boat to operate at an unfavourable trim angle from the point of view of resistance, as the minimum drag-lift ratio occurs at an angle greater than the angle needed to avoid porpoising. The trim angle required to avoid porpoising increases with increasing deadrise angle. Increasing the deadrise enables a planning surface to operate at trim angles more closely approaching those required for minimum drag. So, it may happen a 20º deadrise brings better drag results than a 15º one at high speeds, if it risens the trim angle to a more efficient one from the point of view of the drag-lift ratio." I am sorry but I do not know the author, it was a cut and paste I put away for a rainy day, most likely someone on this forum, I am sure they will recognise the contents if that is the case, and I apologize for not giving credit. |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| porpoising hi, I want to study about porpoising and its limits. is there any one help me by some refrences? also I would calculate hydrodinamic coefficients in heave and pitch fore a prismatic planning boat. please direct me by your knowledge and experience. |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
thanks for your good help. do you know when a bout start to planning and go on its motion how Trim angle treat? does it increase? |
|
#21
| ||||
| ||||
| Title : The Prediction of Porpoising Inception for Modern Planing Craft Descriptive Note : Tullio /Celano, III Corporate Author : NAVAL ACADEMY ANNAPOLIS MD Report Date : 1998 Abstract : The purpose of this project was to study porpoising, one of the most common forms of dynamic instability found in planing boats. In descriptive terms, it is a coupled oscillation in pitch and heave that occurs in relatively calm water. These oscillations can be divergent in amplitude, leading to loss of control, injury to occupants or damage to the craft. The mechanics of porpoising have been studied sporadically from theoretical and experimental perspectives for many years. Studies have shown that the inception of porpoising is influenced by displacement, center of gravity location, and various hull characteristics such as deadrise and beam. Until now, Day & Haag's thesis provided the only systematic test results concerning the porpoising stability limits of planing craft. Although the Day and Haag model tests were brilliantly executed and thoroughly reported, many users of these data are not aware of the size of the models tested. The average beam of the three tiny prismatic hulls was only 3.8 inches. As a starting point, these tests were recreated using a series of three hard-chined prismatic planning hullforms approximately five times larger. The tests included hulls with higher deadrise angles, more typical of craft now employed for high-speed military purposes. Two models of actual full-scale craft, complete with performance enhancing features including lifting strakes, trim tabs, and variable drive angle were tested. These additions were found to have a profound effect upon the conditions at the inception of porpoising. Established planing hull analysis methods were augmented with techniques developed during the course of the study to provide a basis from which to design and outfit high-speed, heavily laden planing hulls with respect to porpoising stability. Title : Theoretical Determination of Porpoising Instability of High-Speed Planing Boats, Corporate Author : DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BETHESDA MD Personal Author(s) : Martin,Milton Report Date : APR 1976 Abstract : A theoretical method is derived for predicting trim angle and speed coefficient at the inception of porpoising of prismatic planing hulls. Although equations are derived for the surge, pitch, and heave degrees of freedom, it is seen that the effect of surge is small at ordinary operating trim angles. Comparisons of theoretical predictions with existing experimental data on coupled pitch and heave porpoising show reasonably good agreement for a wide range of speed coefficients, load coefficients, and deadrise angles. The theory may also be used for estimating the natural frequencies and damping characteristics of prismatic hulls in the stable, high-speed planing range. |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| thanks I found it at DTIC website, But I dontknow how can I download it!! |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| hi Dingo is it possible for me have your exell sheet? |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| hi I real life how is the variety of center of pressure in planinig hull?especialy when porpoising occure? is it a oscilate motion forward and afterward of center of gravity? |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| Hi, Would you help me to find these books. Quote:
|
|
#26
| |||
| |||
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| can planning hull calculate use vortex lattice methode? I want to compare with savetsky methode.. Any have idea |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Savitsky Power Prediction | guest12020101217 | Software | 132 | 02-21-2012 06:39 AM |
| Daniel Savitsky Textbook | jamesflett | Boat Design | 5 | 11-27-2006 02:59 AM |
| Help SAVITSKY power prediction | chocomono | Boat Design | 21 | 02-14-2006 05:53 AM |
| Help with Savitsky Prediction and shaft inclination | fede | Boat Design | 4 | 06-08-2005 07:08 PM |
| Savitsky correction for waterjets? | nemo | Boat Design | 10 | 05-02-2005 08:00 PM |