| ||||
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| MaxSurf profile question When making a 0009 profile MaxSurf and comparing it to a published 0009 profile in "Theory of wing sections". There is a significant difference around the forward 20% of the profile... The published profile is blunter and slightly thicker than Masurf's built in 0009 profile. Why the difference? Andrew? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Erik You appear to be correct, the section looks to be wrong. I have redone the fit using Maxsurf Pro's surface fitting code and this gives the following control point x and y positions - -1000.0 0.0 -940.9 7.3 -800.5 20.9 -593.2 35.3 -370.2 46.7 -176.0 43.9 -79.3 34.5 -1.4 16.7 0.0 0.0 These co-ordinates are in millimeters and are using 9 control points and order 4 splines. I will ammend the 0009 template in the shipping version of Maxsurf to reflect the corrected control points The fit for the leading part of the aerofoil looks like this, compressed 4:1 along the longitudinal axis -
__________________ Andrew Mason Formsys http://www.formsys.com Maxsurf Academic http://www.formsys.com/academic/maxsurf/ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Maxsurf Question? | cmcguinness | Software | 3 | 02-07-2005 05:15 PM |
| Q. Lines-planes form AutoCAD to Maxsurf ? | cmcguinness | Software | 0 | 12-06-2004 05:02 PM |
| Maxsurf Curvature question | ErikG | Software | 4 | 03-18-2003 03:30 AM |