Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Software
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 09-22-2009, 08:44 AM
yipster's Avatar
yipster yipster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 1083 Posts: 3,337
Location: netherlands
Thanks for your views and advice Ad Hoc and alidesigner

sure, i'm painfully aware of not having a thorough ME background yet already in dos days i produced 3d cad drawings and animations that went on CD's packed with ME study books
but ok i did the drawings not made the lessons so there my cry where is that ME book

early nineties 3d pc drawing was a bit of a study but being brought up with drawing board and ruler pen it was great
FEA and CFD, another that fascinates me even more, were unheard of than
they are amazing new tools worth a study as if it were only to know what is and isn't possible

i made wind, explosions and smoke in 3dstudio but so far always had to make the paths or deflections and can imagine how by manipulating variables CFD does that even better for you
and how nice a tuft grid in a 3d drawing could be, all this is still limited i guess as i still have to see lift, drag, wind and waves, eddy's and what not visualized and calculated

at the marina yesterday i thought of your words of warning Ad Hoc as í'm not aiming for a certificate and, as with so many things, only experience gets one comfortable with a surrounding,
and to be honest, they are to be solved but i don't particularly "like" problems so i wondered what i'm actually trying to accomplish as i was more interested in taking a roller furler down

anyway, inventor works nicer as acad, back to the book
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-22-2009, 08:56 AM
Ad Hoc Ad Hoc is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 1925 Posts: 3,025
Location: Japan
yipster

the way to think of FEA (and indeed CFD) is this:
Would you crack a walnut with a hammer or a nuclear war head?...if you choose the former, the good old hand calc's and basic education/training will get the job done and usually, not that difficult, and you get the walnut to eat. If you choose the later, then, as with a nuke, you'll make a huge mess with lots of 'fall out', walnut everywhere, not "usable" ...looks great though (as do the pretty colour plots)!...even though ones focus is actually cracking open a walnut...not the 'amazing looking fall out'.!!!...everyone is looking at the mushroom cloud, not the real results!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:09 AM
yipster's Avatar
yipster yipster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 1083 Posts: 3,337
Location: netherlands
i hear you and forgive the explosions and smoke, that was from my "games" day's back to read
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:11 AM
Ad Hoc Ad Hoc is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 1925 Posts: 3,025
Location: Japan
any questions...just ask....FEA is a minefield and not to be beguiled by the pretty pictures as many are when using FEA and CFD!!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Autocad StianM Software 10 07-03-2006 03:50 AM
PDF's into AutoCAD Willallison Software 6 06-01-2006 12:24 AM
Modelling composite beams in Ansys fencer Software 3 03-05-2006 08:39 AM
Modelling composite beams in Ansys fencer Boat Design 0 02-27-2006 01:41 AM
Margins in AutoCAD Willallison Software 3 06-17-2005 03:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net