Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Class Societies
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-2010, 04:54 PM
KRL KRL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 19
Location: MED
Gross Tonage

Does any one know of a way to calculate the hull volume with out having a linesplan?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-2010, 05:54 PM
CatBuilder CatBuilder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Rep: 1320 Posts: 3,040
Location: Northeast
You have to know a few basics, but here is a great resource:

http://www.uscg.mil/hq/msc/docs/CG-5...6-04_v1_0b.pdf

and

http://www.qualitymaritime.info/Pres...mplified_0.pdf
__________________
"You can't solve all of life's problems with epoxy" - My Wife
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-06-2010, 06:25 PM
Ike's Avatar
Ike Ike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep: 1356 Posts: 1,371
Location: Washington
Sure. If you know the weight of the hull and add weights to bring it down to a waterline, divide the total weight (hull weight + added weights) in pounds by 62.4 for fresh water and 64 for salt water to get the volume in cubic feet. multiply by 0.03 to get cubic meters.

If you are doing this in kilograms, 1 cubic meter of fresh water weighs 1000 kg. So you simply divide the number of kilograms (hull wt + Added wt) by 1000 for fresh and 1027 for salt water.

This of course means you already have the boat in the water.
__________________
Ike
"Don't tell me that I can't. Tell me how I can!"
New Boatbuilders Home Page
Boat Builder News Blog
My Boating Safety Blog
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-06-2010, 07:17 PM
RAraujo RAraujo is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rep: 99 Posts: 52
Location: Singapore
You can make a gross estimate by multiplying the main dimensions and CB (CB can be estimated according to the ship type). But that is only a gross estimate...
Rodrigo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-2010, 01:01 PM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1493 Posts: 7,447
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Gross tonnage is a legal measurement. You need the line plans or measure the cargo area.
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-07-2010, 01:17 PM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,372
Location: Maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRL View Post
Does any one know of a way to calculate the hull volume with out having a linesplan?
Quite a strange question coming from a naval architect.

Daniel
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-07-2010, 01:41 PM
jehardiman jehardiman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1758 Posts: 1,561
Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAraujo View Post
You can make a gross estimate by multiplying the main dimensions and CB (CB can be estimated according to the ship type). But that is only a gross estimate...
Rodrigo
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzo View Post
Gross tonnage is a legal measurement. You need the line plans or measure the cargo area.
These comments brings up the point wether you are after the submerged volume of the hull or the enclosed volume of the hull. Both volumes can be estimated from the general dimensions as RAaujo stated, but Gonzo is correct that the actual Gross Tonnage is requirements based and cannot be accurately calculated without plans and arrangements because of what is and is not counted in the volume.

Submerged volume on the other hand can be accurately determined wothout a lines plan if other drawings like the D&O's, Bonjeans Curves, or the Stability Book is avaiable.
__________________
A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-09-2010, 05:00 PM
KRL KRL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 19
Location: MED
Hey guys many thanks for your comments. I am new to the forum and I must say that it is very useful. I should have given you more details at the very beginning.

In short I have a situation in which an old work boat has had some of it's superstructure removed and the new GT needs to be calculated. The only drawing I have in hand is a GA.

What I was trying to figure out is that if I know the original GT, can the new GT be calculated by using the volume of the superstructure removed which I can obtain form the GA.

Using GT=K1*V and the block coef.(Cb) formula. If Cb is assumed the total volume of the vessel can be estimated. Using the estimate of the total volume, K1 can be found and by deducting the the volume removed from the total volume, the new GT can be calculated.

Has anyone had similar situation? Is this a impossible task?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-09-2010, 05:09 PM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1493 Posts: 7,447
Location: Milwaukee, WI
What rule are you calculating for?
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-10-2010, 03:42 AM
KRL KRL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 19
Location: MED
No rule as such.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-10-2010, 05:53 AM
daiquiri's Avatar
daiquiri daiquiri is offline
Engineering and Design
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 2574 Posts: 2,731
Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)
Hi,
As you probably already know it, the calculation of ship's Gross Tonnage is defined in the Annex1, Regulation 3 of the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships (1969). You can find the text of the Convention in this webpage, for example: http://www.admiraltylawguide.com/con...nnage1969.html

Now, if you know the previous GT (let me call it GT1), then you can calculate the associated volume by resolving the following system of equations:
Eq.1) GT1 = K1 V1
Eq.2) K1 = 0.2 + 0.02 Log10 (V1)

An iterative process is necessary to resolve this system, you can proceed like this:

Step 1: V1a = GT1 / (0.2 + 0.02 Log10 V1)
Step 2: V1b = V1 + 0.5 (V1a - V1)
Step 3: Difference = V1b - V1
Step 4: V1 = V1b
Step 4: Go to Step 1 until Difference is sufficiently close to 0.

I am enclosing here an xls spreadsheet with implemented procedure which converges after 15-16 iterations. It will give you the moulded hull volume V1 from the known GT1.

Now that you know the V1, you can simply subtract the removed volume to obtain the moulded hull volume of the modified ship, V2.
Calculating the new Gross Tonnage (GT2) is then straightforward from equations 1 and 2 given above.
Hope that I have understood well your question and that this is what you needed.

Cheers!
Attached Files
File Type: xls Volume from GT - iterative.xls (18.5 KB, 116 views)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-10-2010, 09:47 AM
KRL KRL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 19
Location: MED
Where does the 0.5 in step 2 come form?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-10-2010, 09:58 AM
TeddyDiver's Avatar
TeddyDiver TeddyDiver is offline
Gollywobbler
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rep: 1348 Posts: 2,052
Location: Finland/Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRL View Post
Where does the 0.5 in step 2 come form?
To keep the iteration steps at adequate level I think..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-10-2010, 10:21 AM
daiquiri's Avatar
daiquiri daiquiri is offline
Engineering and Design
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 2574 Posts: 2,731
Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)
That's correct, TeddyDiver. It is called Fixed Point Functional Iteration (More about it here, for example: http://pathfinder.scar.utoronto.ca/~...P/node34.html).
In this case, step 1 "predicts" the next value of V1, while step 2 "corrects" the prediction by halving (hence 0.5) the difference between the previous-step V1 and the predicted next-step V1. 0.5 is a value which gives a pretty fast convergence. Should there have been problems with convergence, I would have used a smaller multiplier, say 0.2 or 0.1.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-11-2010, 08:49 AM
KRL KRL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 19
Location: MED
I assume that since I have two equations and two unkowns this iteration method results in a fairly accurate result no?

Daiquiri thats for the spreadsheet it worked fine!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net