Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Class Societies
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 08-12-2010, 12:02 AM
Mat-C Mat-C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 109 Posts: 242
Location: Australia
Ahh.. ok... so if you have two flat-bar stiffeners, both supporting the same panel, both with the same thickness, is the taller one any more prone to web sheer?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-12-2010, 12:05 AM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat-C View Post
Ahh.. ok... so if you have two flat-bar stiffeners, both supporting the same panel, both with the same thickness, is the taller one any more prone to web sheer?
Yes. From point of view of standards, only proportions of stiffener are used to assess web sheer. I would recommend to look at Lloyd's Special Craft rules - they have an album of recommended structural details, both in alloy or FPR. That samples clearly show how to treat high stiffeners.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-12-2010, 12:49 AM
Ad Hoc Ad Hoc is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 1925 Posts: 3,025
Location: Japan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat-C View Post
Ahh.. ok... so if you have two flat-bar stiffeners, both supporting the same panel, both with the same thickness, is the taller one any more prone to web sheer?
Depends how you arrange the structure. But each stiffener is judged on its own dimensional aspects.

Thus in your example, each will have a shear area. The hydrostatic pressure, on the WTB, is the same. Thus the force being applied to each stiffener is the same. Hence the shorter stiffener has a higher shear stress than the deeper one. But if it passes, so what?

The key thing to consider with all aluminium design is deflection checks. Generally once you have designed the structure to satisfy your design stress allowable, you need to check deflections. Deflections are often too high and therefore you need to make the sections stiffer.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-12-2010, 07:13 AM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
Agree with Ad Hoc, same I said - boat designed to ISO12215-5 would not have enough stiffness in some areas. This is matter of experience - to arrange proper stiffening.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-12-2010, 07:53 PM
Mat-C Mat-C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 109 Posts: 242
Location: Australia
Thanks gents. As always you've been generous with your time and knowledge.
I'll go and have a little think about all that you've told me... will no doubt be back soon with more questions!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-26-2010, 04:58 PM
Mat-C Mat-C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 109 Posts: 242
Location: Australia
And indeed, I am back!
Why does ISO require that metal bulkheads be calculated as watertight bulkheads, regardless of whether they are or not?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iso 12215-5 ? fcfc Class Societies 11 10-31-2009 11:49 AM
ISO 12215 effective plating adventurelad Boat Design 10 10-15-2009 07:43 PM
Iso 12215-7 sholt85 Class Societies 1 03-24-2009 01:31 PM
stiffener calculation for ISO 12215-5 wendyyacht Boat Design 0 05-15-2008 01:54 PM
Question about ISO 12215-5 lyqqmxm Class Societies 0 02-29-2008 01:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net