Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-01-2005, 02:07 AM
Bergalia's Avatar
Bergalia Bergalia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep: 254 Posts: 2,517
Location: NSW Australia
who's right who's wrong ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kudu
This comment puzzles me...Does it really matter that the water from both sides of the hull crashes into each other? It seems, at that point of interference the transom would be one step ahead of it, no?
Ah Kudu - it matters not - until you come to a sudden stop - and then your 'transom' stern is 'flooded' whereas the canoe stern cleaves it to either side..

BUT - a big but, it's an argument that is sure to rouse the hackles in either camp - double enders and transomers. Like throwing a stink bomb among the congregation...

Over here in Australia you get the 'petrol heads' arguing the merits of Ford versus Holden (General Motors). To the dispassionate they are much of a muchness... but both camps claim superiority (I drive a RangeRover Discovery) which is obviously far superior...

So when it comes down to it - each to his own. For me, double enders every time - for safety sake. (That's my contribution with a big spoon)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-01-2005, 02:42 AM
dougfrolich dougfrolich is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rep: 140 Posts: 560
Location: San Francisco
I'll second that, Bergalia---Though I do like those big butts. But then again I thought it was a good idea to sail this across the Pacific.
Attached Thumbnails
Who's right Who's wrong? Is A Canoe Stern Better Performing Than A Double Ender?-scan.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-01-2005, 03:03 AM
Skippy Skippy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 12 Posts: 568
Location: cornfields
kudu: Does it really matter that the water from both sides of the hull crashes into each other? It seems, at that point of interference the transom would be one step ahead of it, no?

You always want the water flow to be as straight as possible. Curved flow/crashing is what creates wave drag. There's no transom on a canoe stern, the curved hull creates a low-pressure area that pulls the water toward the centerline. I'm not sure what you mean by one step ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-01-2005, 03:54 AM
Bergalia's Avatar
Bergalia Bergalia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep: 254 Posts: 2,517
Location: NSW Australia
who's right who's wrong ?

Beautiful shot, Doug...but how do I know it's you hidden behind the sail...or if was you, did you hide because you were embarrassed at being caught wearing one of those multicoloured 'weekend yottie' bobble caps...
But bravely done Doug.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-01-2005, 04:44 AM
safewalrus's Avatar
safewalrus safewalrus is offline
Ancient Marriner
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 659 Posts: 4,759
Location: Cornwall, England
Skippy

That's what I said, two fronts/two a***s! Only without the gobblegook!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-01-2005, 11:06 AM
Skippy Skippy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 12 Posts: 568
Location: cornfields
Gobbledygook is my specee-ality.

kudu: Does it really matter that the water from both sides of the hull crashes into each other? It seems, at that point of interference the transom would be one step ahead of it, no?

Skippy: I'm not sure what you mean by one step ahead.


Oh I know, you mean if the water is already past the hull, how can it have any effect? I guess the idea is that energy has already been imparted to the water, and that energy must have been drawn out of the boat. That occurs just before the crash, where the hull is curving inward so the low pressure exerts a drag on the boat. There's also an increase in displacement from the sloped underside of the hull, which I suspect adds to wave drag even more than the sides.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-01-2005, 12:05 PM
kudu kudu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 112
Location: Seattle, Wa. U.S.A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy
kudu: Does it really matter that the water from both sides of the hull crashes into each other? It seems, at that point of interference the transom would be one step ahead of it, no?

You always want the water flow to be as straight as possible. Curved flow/crashing is what creates wave drag. There's no transom on a canoe stern, the curved hull creates a low-pressure area that pulls the water toward the centerline. I'm not sure what you mean by one step ahead.
What I mean Skippy is...Isn't the stern moving away from the turbulance? Doesn't the action take place after the transom has moved forward?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:09 PM
dougfrolich dougfrolich is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rep: 140 Posts: 560
Location: San Francisco
Its like the pic.
Attached Thumbnails
Who's right Who's wrong? Is A Canoe Stern Better Performing Than A Double Ender?-scan.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:25 PM
kudu kudu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 112
Location: Seattle, Wa. U.S.A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy
Gobbledygook is my specee-ality.

kudu: Does it really matter that the water from both sides of the hull crashes into each other? It seems, at that point of interference the transom would be one step ahead of it, no?

Skippy: I'm not sure what you mean by one step ahead.


Oh I know, you mean if the water is already past the hull, how can it have any effect? I guess the idea is that energy has already been imparted to the water, and that energy must have been drawn out of the boat. That occurs just before the crash, where the hull is curving inward so the low pressure exerts a drag on the boat. There's also an increase in displacement from the sloped underside of the hull, which I suspect adds to wave drag even more than the sides.
I'm trying to picture this event...As momentum pushes the double ender forward the water sliding past each side of the hull folds upon itself (turbulence) at the trailing edge of the hull/rudder. At this point isn't it similar to the trailing edge of a sail or wing from a plane? Somewhat of a pinch point where the energy pushes one forward? In other words...a good thing, and after this event it becomes a moot point.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:30 PM
kudu kudu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 112
Location: Seattle, Wa. U.S.A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougfrolich
Its like the pic.
Hey Dougfrolich...In a cruising double ended hull, how fast could you be talking about? I'm assuming I'd be real lucky to do 8 knots. What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:34 PM
kudu kudu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 112
Location: Seattle, Wa. U.S.A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SailDesign
Neither, because a canoe-sterned boat IS a double-ender.
If you mena is a canoe stern better than a CRUISER stern, then we might have an argument to get stuck into. The canoe stern, generally, has "tumblehome" while the cruiser stern doesn't. VERY generally....
And the question has to be asked, as FastFred did, what do you mean by "performance" in this question?
Steve
Could you elaborate on the Cruiser stern vs a canoe? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-01-2005, 01:42 PM
kudu kudu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 112
Location: Seattle, Wa. U.S.A.
I'm with you Bergalia...There is nothing finer, sweeter, sexier and oh yes, more pleasing to the eye than a double ender!!! I will happily deal with the loss of a + or - 1/2 knot of speed from a double ender, as FastFred describes!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-01-2005, 04:02 PM
Sean Herron's Avatar
Sean Herron Sean Herron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 405 Posts: 1,532
Location: Richmond, BC, CA.
I am right - absolutely....

Hello...

This is a funny thread for me - just recently I have been thinking about and doodling boats of 22 feet in length and shooting the poop at work with the 'guys' about double enders or transom sterns...

I have also decided that divorces are expensive because they are worth it - but my wife is still very attractive and she puts up with me so I don't go there...

She is a pain in the ass though - but thats better than fat, boring, and stupid looking I suppose...

So what have you...

I am suprised old Dave Gerr did not plant himself on this one as he seems to be the only contemporary designer doing proper canoe sterned yachts - which I think are ugly and stupid looking - and I am right - all the time - and in any place - because I am usually by myself there...

Happy wife - happy life - you can be right or you can be happy - you choose...

So canoe sterns are funny, ugly and weird - at least to me and MY wife - plus they are tricky to loft, fair and build - and hard to explain to people who ask 'why'...

You can draw and hide some flat aft sections into them per the discussion above - but something not mentioned thus far is the lack of bouyancy aft in both double enders and canoe sterned ulgies...

This is something to consider when taking into thought the use of the boat - how many people and things - gas tanks - water tanks - engines - outboards - rail mounted BBQ's are going to 'hanging' about the back end of the boat while sailing...

A transomed boat can load up asymetrically quite well for the daysail - and a double ender can load up very well for a long cruise - meaning you can sink the 'transom' of a double ender with little appreciable difference in performance or load waterline plans - sink a 'normal' transom below the DWL on a fatass boat and you get all those ugly eddies and little negative suction thingies...

Aside from all these thoughts - canoe sterns are just ugly and stupid - and I am always right when standing alone in an empty room...

Oh man - life is hard....

See http://www.donkrafft.com/gerr_boats.htm ...

SH
Attached Thumbnails
Who's right Who's wrong? Is A Canoe Stern Better Performing Than A Double Ender?-gerr30c_small.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-01-2005, 05:46 PM
Skippy Skippy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 12 Posts: 568
Location: cornfields
kudu: As momentum pushes the double ender forward the water sliding past each side of the hull folds upon itself (turbulence) at the trailing edge of the hull/rudder.

No, back up one step (actually, move forward ). As you can see in Doug's sketch, the hump of water is building up before it clears the stern. That's where the suction slows (and weighs) the boat down, where it's still in contact with the hull.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-01-2005, 05:51 PM
Sean Herron's Avatar
Sean Herron Sean Herron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 405 Posts: 1,532
Location: Richmond, BC, CA.
Tea Pots...

Hello...

Don't know if th is makes sense - but think of the tea dribbling down the side of a smooth lipped pot - it has been found that a pot with a sharp edged mouth (unfinished cheap metal) drips less - 'good release'...

Cheers - sun is out...

SH>
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Plane a double ender Inquisitor Powerboats 21 06-22-2010 05:40 AM
Is there validity to the notion that a pointy stern, a canoe stern, is safer at sea saltydog123 Sailboats 27 04-01-2009 04:20 AM
Colin Archer double ender designs? Mohan Pakkurti Boat Design 16 03-01-2009 08:10 PM
Double ender on a Crusing Cat fburton Boat Design 10 09-16-2005 11:44 AM
38' Atkin design 'INGRID'(double ender) hull layup Ian MacFarlane Materials 5 07-10-2004 09:29 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net