Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-13-2006, 05:58 PM
jelfiser's Avatar
jelfiser jelfiser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 37 Posts: 98
Location: Italy
what about hard chine aft

i'm in truble with aft design of my hard chine plywood 6 meter sailboat design -You can red more at (http://boatdesign.net/forums/showthread.php?t=12496)
I mean i absolutely don't want problem with following sea but I prefer a large aft for having more volume on back and planing easier , my question is why I have never seen on a one chine hull an aft like this ? usually they are more rectangular
Someone can tell me ?
Attached Thumbnails
what  about hard chine aft-aft-1-.jpg  what  about hard chine aft-aft2.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-13-2006, 06:28 PM
CORMERAN CORMERAN is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 13 Posts: 65
Location: Vancover,BC, Canada
To jelfiser,

check out the very successfull one design sail boat, the THUNDERBIRD.
Sailed for many years in the Pacific North West.
Made of ply. With hard chines.

It was faster than many more " modern " boats.

Dont feel that the aft beam needs to be super wide. Getting on plane
will happen without excessive width - especialy if you keep the WEIGHT
down.
Being pushed sideways - out of control - is not fun. So this is one area
of design I prefer to be conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-13-2006, 09:35 PM
Ike's Avatar
Ike Ike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep: 1256 Posts: 1,317
Location: Washington
The question should be, will it rise to a following sea? This depends partly on volume but is more dependent on shape and weight. The shape you have is good, and as someone said well proven. Thunderbirds are famous in the Pacific Northwest. The other is to make sure you keep the weight out of the ends. The weight should be centered. Don't be storing anchors and chain and placing engines in the stern.
__________________
Ike
"Don't tell me that I can't. Tell me how I can!"
New Boatbuilders Home Page
Boat Builder News Blog
My Boating Safety Blog
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-13-2006, 11:19 PM
frosh's Avatar
frosh frosh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 44 Posts: 621
Location: AUSTRALIA
Hi Jelfiser, the stern shape in your picture to me resembles a semi-planing hull that should behave well in big seas in dispacement mode, which is how it will likely sail most of the time. For better planing you need a flatter V and more width at the stern at the waterline. Then other factors such as weight and sail area are also critical.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-14-2006, 06:59 AM
Billymac Billymac is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 23
Location: Brick lane, London
Ike, interested in why the weight can't be put at each end rather than centre. I thought this would make a more stable boat.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-14-2006, 03:14 PM
CORMERAN CORMERAN is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 13 Posts: 65
Location: Vancover,BC, Canada
Hi Billymac,

weight increased at the ends might be of use in a race car. As it effects
the Polar Unit of Inertia.
In simple terms - the car wont want to spin as quickly - making it more
forgiving to drive fast. Like a long wheel base, front engine Ferrari compared to short wheel base Porsche.

However: cars live, somewhat, in a 2 dimentional world. Whereas, boats have to function in 3 dimentions.

Weight placement, in small planing boats is a whole 'nother debate.

Specificaly, to the vessel shown by jelfisher - said vessel will most likely
be operating - in the most part at DISPLACEMENT speed. With moments
of excitement - when surfing down waves - at " planing " speeds.
Therefore - FIRST it must function as a displacement vessel.

Somewhere, close to Herreshoff's birth place ( his designs won the
America's Cup at least 5 times) - there is a large rock.

Cut deeply into it, is this law, defined by himself:

" With displacement craft, weight needs to be kept out of the ends.
Placing as much of the weight as possible, close to the centre of
the vessel."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-14-2006, 05:36 PM
jelfiser's Avatar
jelfiser jelfiser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 37 Posts: 98
Location: Italy
Just seen thunderbird , it seem really interesting, i'm going to experiment and evaluate some modification to see how does it work .. does anyone heve some information more on this boat(cp, angle of entrance.. etc.)?

For the weight ...as you can see in an approssimate weight extimate in previous forum ancors and motor are keeped at prow, i have to balace the weight on the bow, two people:150kg is a lot but i cannot governate the boat in the middle !!!
yes, it have to be a semi planing hull and i was thincking to a criteria to evaluate how flat should be plywod panels over and down the chine, also the eight of the chine at the aft i'm just making some consideration on waterline with the boat helled of 25 deg .
tanks you all for interesting considerations
Attached Thumbnails
what  about hard chine aft-bow.jpg  what  about hard chine aft-profile.jpg  what  about hard chine aft-waterline-25-degrees.jpg  

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-16-2006, 04:15 AM
im412 im412 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 5 Posts: 61
Location: australia
the japanese and chinese use to use an open transom for water balast in a following sea on their wide buoyant transoms eg junks even down to little skiffs
something to consider

http://www.amateurboatbuilding.com/a...se_boats3.html

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-23-2006, 09:56 PM
Ike's Avatar
Ike Ike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep: 1256 Posts: 1,317
Location: Washington
Comeran, thanks. You explained it better than I would have. The main thing to remember is that the more weight you have in the ends the slower the are to accelerate upwards. So you get more water over the bow and more on the stern. If they are light they rise quickly. Of course this is a balancing act (bad pun). You don't want the boat to "hobby horse" either and you need enough structure there for strength. But heavy objects hould be as close to the center as possible.

By the way Australian 18's also use an open stern.
__________________
Ike
"Don't tell me that I can't. Tell me how I can!"
New Boatbuilders Home Page
Boat Builder News Blog
My Boating Safety Blog
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hard Chine Definition Needed Phosphor Boat Design 16 07-09-2004 11:11 AM
Hard chine hulls? Which software is best? stefano Software 5 04-13-2004 09:12 AM
Opinions on round bilge vs hard chine Bassman Boat Design 5 02-21-2004 08:34 PM
Hard chine boat design Guest Boat Design 0 09-10-2003 11:50 AM
Prochine3 and hard chine sailboats Tim Dunn Software 0 05-04-2003 07:36 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net