Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2009, 09:59 AM
floating floating is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 25
Location: NJ
Wet or dry mass in virtual mass of a towed object?

I would like to calculate the virtual mass (actual mass plus added mass) of a towed object, including the lines used to tow it. I'm calculating the mass of each component then summing them up. Do I use the wet rather than dry mass? If so, does it matter that a section of line is buoyant, so its wet mass is negative? [I guess it still requires force to tow it because its added mass is positive, but the concept is confusing.]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-16-2009, 06:57 PM
Ad Hoc Ad Hoc is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 1776 Posts: 2,694
Location: Japan
It all depends upon the shape and also the axis that the shape is being pulled.

It is the "below" volume shape, and the "mass" is the buoyancy of this immersed volume.

Hoerner's "Fluid Dynmaic Drag" book is excellent and will give you basic added mass of shapes. A must book!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2009, 07:50 PM
Ad Hoc Ad Hoc is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 1776 Posts: 2,694
Location: Japan
PS..should have added, as a very very VERY rough and crude rule of thumb, around 80% of mass, as added mass. BUT really depends upon the shape and direction of flow relative to the shape etc etc etc. It is a good starting position anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-16-2009, 09:01 PM
jehardiman jehardiman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1623 Posts: 1,483
Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA
The answer is you have to add both, the coefficient of added mass is dependent on your shape relative to the flow, and no, everything always has positive mass both in acceleration and deceleration (i.e. your tow body can ram you if contitions are correct).

The equation is Mefficitive = M + Ca *V*rho, where Ca is dependent on the direction of acceleration, and V is the envelope volume (especially important for "open" bodies), and rho is the fluid mass density.

Hoerner is good, but Blevins is better for Ca. Rule of thumb for long slender axisymetric bodies is Ca=0.1 along the axis and 1.0 accross it. For pure square or I-beam shapes Ca transverse =2. For other angles of attack a rough Ca = 0.1+.9*(sin^2(alpha)*Ca transverse). It is important to remember what Ca is; it is the intergral of pressure over the surface of the body caused by the acceleration of the steady state flow (which may already be accelerated relative to the free stream by the shape, but that is the pressure drag) over the body. It therefor works in both speeding up and slowing down. Many a tug has been rammed by it's tow.
__________________
A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion.

Last edited by jehardiman : 06-16-2009 at 09:02 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-16-2009, 09:14 PM
Ad Hoc Ad Hoc is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 1776 Posts: 2,694
Location: Japan
Jehardiman

Not come across Blevins...what is the name of the book, i'll look it up.
I've alwasy used Hoerner, but lost my copy when i moved to Japan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-16-2009, 09:30 PM
jehardiman jehardiman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1623 Posts: 1,483
Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA
http://www.amazon.com/Applied-Dynami.../dp/157524182X
__________________
A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-16-2009, 09:33 PM
Ad Hoc Ad Hoc is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 1776 Posts: 2,694
Location: Japan
J.Man

thanks...much cheaper than Hoerner's too!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-16-2009, 09:43 PM
jehardiman jehardiman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1623 Posts: 1,483
Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ad Hoc View Post
J.Man

thanks...much cheaper than Hoerner's too!
Blevins is a lot like Hoerner. Gives the theory, then gives the compiled test data (with references to the actual paper/data!) to show the difference. I recommend it to everyone who wants a balanced insight to fluid dynamics
__________________
A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass production Brian.Lin Metal Boat Building 4 04-13-2009 11:03 AM
Mass Moment of Inertia netjaws Boat Design 13 03-25-2009 01:06 PM
Engine Plant Mass navarch_hish Diesel Engines 2 09-02-2006 10:43 AM
Mass production technologies for boats JonathanCole Boat Design 6 07-25-2005 06:27 AM
Rhino again... Mass properties? henrikb Software 3 11-21-2003 03:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net