Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Most Recent Posts Gallery Images Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2011, 09:37 PM
Dave Gudeman Dave Gudeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rep: 359 Posts: 139
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
seeing the world differently

This article says that architects see the world differently from the way that normal people do and that this leads to buildings that look wonderful for architects but that normal people hate.

I'd be curious to know what boat designers think of this. Do you think your education warped (OK, "changed" ) your esthetic judgment so that you literally see things differently from normal people? I have seen comments on this site that seem to be boat designers showing contempt for the esthetics of boat buyers. How widespread do you think that is?

Please don't take this as a personal attack, anyone. I don't have any personal problem with modern boat designs; I'm just curious to know what designers think of this possibility.
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 10-23-2011, 09:41 PM
eyschulman eyschulman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Rep: 77 Posts: 249
Location: seattle Wa USA
All the architects I know are as abnormal as everybody else.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2011, 10:08 PM
rwatson's Avatar
rwatson rwatson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1658 Posts: 4,582
Location: Tasmania,Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Gudeman View Post
This article says that architects see the world differently from the way that normal people do and that this leads to buildings that look wonderful for architects but that normal people hate.

I'd be curious to know what boat designers think of this. Do you think your education warped (OK, "changed" ) your esthetic judgment so that you literally see things differently from normal people? I have seen comments on this site that seem to be boat designers showing contempt for the esthetics of boat buyers. How widespread do you think that is?

Please don't take this as a personal attack, anyone. I don't have any personal problem with modern boat designs; I'm just curious to know what designers think of this possibility.
Of course this is absolutely true. Boat Buyers and Designers alike are subject to their own personal experiences and understandings.

As someone who has tried to get designers interested in a concept, it is amazing how different people interpret the same 'brief' so .... differently .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2011, 01:17 AM
philSweet's Avatar
philSweet philSweet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Rep: 967 Posts: 1,489
Location: Beaufort, SC and H'ville, NC
I think what is valued most is what can be hyped the easiest. As far as aesthetics are concerned, you're at the risk of the reviewer. With a feature, you can prime the pump. I think legal and marketing would prefer distinctiveness over beauty. I bet the vast majority of NAs never get asked to design a pretty boat.

In the book 100 boat designs reviewed, the editor places special emphasis on designs for the designer himself, his family, and his friends. It is one of my favorite books.

Oh, to answer your question directly- Yes, of course it does. I happen to think a '95 chevy pickup is one of the greatest works of art on the planet. Contrary to the saying, mostly, you can account for taste.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2011, 08:14 AM
hoytedow's Avatar
hoytedow hoytedow is offline
American Omnivore
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 2363 Posts: 4,888
Location: North of Cuba
I know what I like; practicality. It doesn't matter how pretty it is, but practical is pretty so it does matter after all, I guess.
__________________
Young people may be reckless, but old people are dangerous. Fanie
The universe is unfolding as it should. Yobarnacle
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2011, 09:08 AM
WillyG WillyG is offline
 
Like this?
Attached Thumbnails
seeing the world differently-postcard1.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:07 PM
peter radclyffe's Avatar
peter radclyffe peter radclyffe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 662 Posts: 1,361
Location: europe
if some architects were locked in and made to live forever in the ugly buildings they design, they would have time to see things differently
__________________
The First J Class Designs for 75 years
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:13 PM
peter radclyffe's Avatar
peter radclyffe peter radclyffe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 662 Posts: 1,361
Location: europe
have you read the
Portland Cement Self Help book for Architects
__________________
The First J Class Designs for 75 years
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:19 PM
peter radclyffe's Avatar
peter radclyffe peter radclyffe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 662 Posts: 1,361
Location: europe
http://m.bdonline.co.uk/news/alsop-a...140222.article
__________________
The First J Class Designs for 75 years
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:38 PM
viking north's Avatar
viking north viking north is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rep: 1061 Posts: 1,694
Location: Nova Scotia
Peter my money maker is not boats, most of my boat builds are quazi profitable so in order to live I build or oversee the construction of homes. The most beautiful along with the ugliest have been designed by architects. The most pratical, long lasting, and low maintenance rarely. The problem being house design is their canvas and they all want to paint the perfect picture regardless of the aftereffects. 25% of the homes I have been asked to build or project manage on behalf of the customer I have walked away from because I couldn't convince them of the high cost, high maintenance and impraticle monster they were about to build. Having said that every once and awhile I meet one that is open to input and just a pleasure to work with .
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-24-2011, 06:07 PM
water addict water addict is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Rep: 73 Posts: 313
Location: maryland
Naval Architecture is engineering, and schools train nav archs as such. Architecture and engineering are very different vocations. Architects by and large are trying to make an asthetic statement. Engineers want something that efficiently serves a need or purpose based on customer requirements.

Yacht designers may have more of an asthetic bent than the more general field of naval architects. A yacht designer is not a naval architect, unless he/she has the formal engineering training. And the formal engineering most definitely makes one see the world differently- I am a naval arch. and my mind has been bent. Everywhere I look I see forces, moments, accelerations, fluid flow, etc.!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-24-2011, 07:00 PM
viking north's Avatar
viking north viking north is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rep: 1061 Posts: 1,694
Location: Nova Scotia
Exactly, as such one would also be more aware of cause and effects but would you be open to input or constructive critisim from the worker that has to put it all together. Therein I feel lies the magic of maximizing the product. That co-respect is so important in forming a succesful team. Been there stayed with some walked from others.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-24-2011, 07:45 PM
aranda1984 aranda1984 is offline
aranda1984
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rep: 101 Posts: 63
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
seeing the world differently

The following is an opinion! Mine!!!

With due respect, there are two basic types of Engineers (professionals) in paractically every field.

The first type, the succesful ones, do things by the book, they seem to be more conservative in design, more strict in life etc.
They normally end up as heads of their departments.

If they learned their craft well, then they will do a fairly decent job as professionals. (Otherwise, they are good politicians.)

The other type, the ones who have also learned the craft, but have an added artistic talent.
These people might appear a bit more unorthodox. The most important thing for them is creative fereedom! (What is that?)
They might dress more casually, they might behave in a more flaky way... (sorry)
However, they can dream up beautiful lines, lovely curves, it is in their blood.
These beautiful lines might even fit inside the engineering requirements of the project.

Very frequently they are overruled by the first group or by bean counters.

This lucky combination of art and science mostly comes out only in projects they do for themselves!

There is another point worth to mention:
Art is in the eye of the beholder! (...Ain't that the truth!)

And this is why some artist can sell a clear white canvas in a black frame, call it something outrageous and get a million dollar for it.
..or design a 40 some meter long yacht with stairways going to heaven.. (we have seen it here!)

In my five decades of engineering, the most problem I had was convincing ignorant people on the merit of a good design. It was obvious to any professional, but people who knew nothing held the purse strings.
... Or introducing a new line or shape to one who did not behold beauty in his eyes!

Yes. Creative people sometimes do look a bit different. They certainly act different!
They do not repeat the obvious. They need to come up with something new!
... Something different, maybe something better!

Most perceptions in life are subjective. This is why the same thing can appear so drastically different to two people!
The old saying: every coin has two sides is true, but sometimes the important stuff is printed on the edge!

There goes my perspective!

Regards,

Stephen I. M.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-24-2011, 08:08 PM
Squidly-Diddly Squidly-Diddly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Rep: 264 Posts: 927
Location: SF bay
Archies I've met want awards from peers, and don't care too much

about the people who use their building afterwards.

Some of that seems to come from each building being such a unique case it is hard for blame to find the architect afterwards. Too many other factors muddy the waters.

Recently, a fad has been imitation "converted industrial building lofts" for apartment or condo design. These are supposed to imitate dwellings created when artists and hippies turned abandoned industial buildings into "lofts". For some reason they all have a top floor with front door, kitchen, bath, dining, and a long narrow steep staircase to a lower bedroom without any door between. Really god awful once the novelty wears off in about 10 minutes, or the 3rd time you use the stairs. Not good for the knees to suddenly climb stairs without warmup, even if you are 14yrs old. Bad HVAC due to big vertical dimension. Bad use of space and materials. Real bitch if something goes wrong with MEP.

Land Architects get away with nonsense not possible for Naval Architects.

Some very sensible and practical architecture can be found in CA housing tracts from builders such as Kaufman&Broad. "McMansions". Just nice and liveable, everything where you tend to use it. Just feels right, and you never think about it. Cheaply built but it works and seems to last OK. Lots of low key passive energy saving tricks like placement of overhangs and windows in relation to sun, seasons and room usage. Houses laid out in relation to each other to minimize neighbor conflicts in everything from "eyeballing" to backing out of driveways, to where the garbage cans are stored.

I don't think they get awards, probably get bashed by snooty peers.
Reply With Quote


  #15  
Old 10-25-2011, 12:33 AM
Poida Poida is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep: 452 Posts: 1,151
Location: Australia
Dave, good thread, I was considering posting something similar myself.

I have worked in several industries over the years and each new I have learned new skills and view things differently.

Such as, I used to erect patio roofs, and now when I see a patio roof, I automatically look at the structural design and workmanship rather than just simply look at it as a whole.

And so it makes me wonder about people who have all the design knowledge on boats. Do they analyse all the lines of the boat in regard to performance, stability and C.O.G and whatever.

Or can they just look at a boat like I do, place for the fishing rods, tackle box there, seating for my mates. She'll do.

I love boats and my ignorance of boat design.

I love those old timber boats with a diesel donk that chugs along at about 5 knots and probably a boat designers eyesore.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2016 Olympics: Sailors of the World - Hang your heads and weep! (Sail-World) Doug Lord Sailboats 82 10-11-2011 03:55 PM
This Little World... Sean Herron Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 0 11-01-2008 10:34 PM
Amazing in the world sunny Boat Design 5 01-10-2007 08:34 PM
Hello world sandman1984 Boatbuilding 2 12-15-2005 12:48 AM
new in the yacht world foturis Services & Employment 0 10-14-2005 05:03 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2014 Boat Design Net