| ||||
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Daiquiri, Except if I am wrong and uploaded the wrong one (which I don't think), this is not the NPL4a graph but the actual hulls re-ran into Michlet at a much lower scale (0 to 2.5 kts) Where I think this can be more than adequate is in terms of relative values for comparing different designs. Finally, where I find this important is that this gives a feel about the expected figures for resistance and hence powering. Even if a ball park estimate within percents (5-10%?) it is always good to have a reasonable figure in mind. Thanks again |
|
#17
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
![]() All the best, S. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Free!Ship 2.6+ vs Prediction resistance by Holtrop-Mennen started method | Victor T | Software | 295 | 09-20-2011 04:11 PM |
| Empirical vs Computational Resistance Prediction | calavera | Boat Design | 0 | 08-07-2009 11:36 AM |
| fishboat resistance prediction method | quyetvtt46 | Propulsion | 4 | 12-04-2008 03:52 PM |
| Catamaran resistance/power prediction | Spiff24 | Software | 2 | 02-16-2005 11:46 AM |
| Recommendation software for resistance prediction?? | Thong Jia Rong | Software | 6 | 10-10-2004 08:45 PM |