Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-13-2012, 03:45 PM
tom28571 tom28571 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rep: 1500 Posts: 1,681
Location: Oriental, NC
There is a MacGregor 36 conversion over on ebay. Its being done as electric. Don"t know any particulars but its bid is $7K. Should be no problem getting a Mac 36 to run in the high teens with reasonable power.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Catam...item3a7074e65a
__________________
Tom Lathrop
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-13-2012, 06:01 PM
sabahcat's Avatar
sabahcat sabahcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 257 Posts: 793
Location: australia
From Malcolm Tennant
Quote:
When many of the French catamaran companies decided to get into power cats they just fitted larger engines into their sailing hulls, probably because being production boats they had the moulds handy. This is fine as long as you are not going to exceed around 15 knots. Beyond this speed the hulls start squatting and assuming a bow out attitude.
http://www.catamarans.com/news/2006/...comparison.asp
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-13-2012, 10:04 PM
svmegatron svmegatron is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: United States
@sabahcat, that's really interesting. I'd be pretty happy staying below 15 knots. It sounds like the problem with converting a macgregor, stiletto, etc. might be that the sterns wouldn't support the weight of twin outboards mounted to the transoms. Maybe there's something out there with more volume aft that would support the weight.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-13-2012, 11:08 PM
sabahcat's Avatar
sabahcat sabahcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 257 Posts: 793
Location: australia
Or maybe you could make a new "clip on" modifying the last 10 feet of hull.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-14-2012, 06:24 AM
brian eiland's Avatar
brian eiland brian eiland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Rep: 1577 Posts: 2,737
Location: Washinton DC, Annapolis MD, Thailand
Its not necessarily a question of the sterns having enough bouyancy that's causing them to squat. Much of the squating can be related to speed of the water passing under those sterns and its decreasing pressure.

Lower you speed requirements.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-14-2012, 06:46 AM
Mr Efficiency Mr Efficiency is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rep: 246 Posts: 711
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian eiland View Post
Its not necessarily a question of the sterns having enough bouyancy that's causing them to squat. Much of the squating can be related to speed of the water passing under those sterns and its decreasing pressure.

Lower you speed requirements.
Under sail, the line of thrust is high, and that would push the bows down, countering squat. None of that with the power version.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:13 AM
Richard Woods's Avatar
Richard Woods Richard Woods is offline
Woods Designs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Rep: 976 Posts: 691
Location: UK and Canada
I have posted this photo before on this forum.

A Banshee sailing catamaran at 22 knots towing a waterskier using twin 90hp outboards. Note the extreme trim. Not very efficient. It's due in part to a lack of buoyancy aft and also to no lifting surface aft

This same boat has been sailed at 19 knots

Richard Woods of Woods Designs

www.sailingcatamarans.com
Attached Thumbnails
Reasonably seaworthy cruising powercat conversion-banshee-waterski-2.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-14-2012, 06:25 PM
Ilan Voyager Ilan Voyager is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 572 Posts: 646
Location: Cancun Mexico
Richard, you showed the points but it's useless to try to explain that the hulls of a sail catamaran are not very suitable for a motor boat.
Yes the are many inconveniences:
1- The Prismatic coefficient is to small.
2- The position of the center of buoyancy is too forward.
3- There is a problem of repartition of weights, and not enough volume aft to exploit the potential of the length of the hulls.
4- there are not spray rails thus the boat will be very wet.
5- Probably the boat will be too wide, and without the pressure of sails, the boat will have this typical catamaran high frequency roll that make the stomachs so upset as the hulls are not designed to damper this roll.

Worst the total price of the operation is not very good; in the price of the sail cat there are a mast, rigging, and sail hardware totally useless on a motor boat.
Placing the outboards on the stern is not the best idea, a part the weight problem, the engines will end drowned if the sea is coming from behind and in a choppy sea the propellers will spend half of the time moving air. So a pair of pods have to be made just aft the rear beam, plus the place for the gas tanks, and the security items required by the use of gas, highly explosive.
The dagger or centerboards are useless or too big, the rudders also.
I do not even evoke the problem of making a windshield nor a tower.
Morality: after massacring a fine sail cat, and after spending a lot money and work you will end with a not-good motor boat with no resale value...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-14-2012, 08:17 PM
Mr Efficiency Mr Efficiency is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rep: 246 Posts: 711
Location: Australia
I'd like to see how such a sail cat could have outboards stuck to the back of it and operate successfully, keeping them in the water, or having insoluble problems with drag, would seem to be a real headache to me.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-14-2012, 09:52 PM
svmegatron svmegatron is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: United States
The consensus here seems to be "you can try it, but it's not going to do what you want." I'm okay with this.

Thank you all for saving me from going down a very frustrating and expensive road. I am going to keep saving up, and hope to build one of Mr Woods' Skoota 28s (a boat designed for the EXACT purpose I have in mind :-) ) later this year.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:03 PM
Mr Efficiency Mr Efficiency is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rep: 246 Posts: 711
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by svmegatron View Post
The consensus here seems to be "you can try it, but it's not going to do what you want." I'm okay with this.

Thank you all for saving me from going down a very frustrating and expensive road. I am going to keep saving up, and hope to build one of Mr Woods' Skoota 28s (a boat designed for the EXACT purpose I have in mind :-) ) later this year.
I couldn't find that skoota 28 ?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:08 PM
svmegatron svmegatron is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: United States
It's at the bottom of this page: http://www.sailingcatamarans.com/skootas.htm

On that page its labeled as a Skoota 26, but I understand he's lengthened the hulls to give it more load carrying capacity (I think ... don't quote me on that. As I've made obvious, I don't know much about boat design!)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:24 PM
Mr Efficiency Mr Efficiency is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rep: 246 Posts: 711
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by svmegatron View Post
It's at the bottom of this page: http://www.sailingcatamarans.com/skootas.htm

On that page its labeled as a Skoota 26, but I understand he's lengthened the hulls to give it more load carrying capacity (I think ... don't quote me on that. As I've made obvious, I don't know much about boat design!)
OK, thanks. The 36 footer has some pics on the site.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:27 PM
Richard Woods's Avatar
Richard Woods Richard Woods is offline
Woods Designs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Rep: 976 Posts: 691
Location: UK and Canada
The first Skoota 28 starts building tomorrow (Feb 15th) A bit scary as its a new design, being built by a builder I haven't used before, and I am 1500 miles away in Lake Havasu, Az at the HPCC www.sailhavasu.com

I drew the Skoota 20 first, just to see how my ideas worked in practice. Then I drew the Skoota 24 and Skoota 36. I have been unsure about how big to make the mid range design. I started with a sketch of a 31fter, then went back down to 26ft and ended up at 28ft as a boat that I felt would be the minimum basic live aboard coastal cruiser, yet would still be transportable

We will be using our Skoota in the Pacific North West, cruising between Seattle and Alaska. However we may truck it to the Great Lakes and do a Great Circle cruise

I'll keep you all informed

Richard Woods of Woods Designs

www.sailingcatamarans.com
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-15-2012, 01:23 AM
Milehog Milehog is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rep: 154 Posts: 132
Location: PNW
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Woods View Post
The first Skoota 28 starts building tomorrow (Feb 15th)
I'll keep you all informed
Please do, I'm interested.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seaworthy Kayak ????? Frosty Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 19 02-08-2011 10:50 PM
Making an amphibian more seaworthy. alexlebrit Boat Design 2 10-24-2006 12:49 PM
Seaworthy Sailboats 11 06-26-2006 12:45 PM
45 Carricraft Seaworthy? eurotk1 Powerboats 1 11-14-2004 11:47 AM
Flat bottoms seaworthy? Gilmarine Boat Design 8 10-01-2004 02:22 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net