Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-14-2009, 12:38 AM
tspeer tspeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rep: 1395 Posts: 1,537
Location: Des Moines, Washington, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCat View Post
You guys are mean. In simple terms, the PC is how tapered a boat hull is under water. More volume in the ends = a 'blunter' boat, with a higher percentage of its underwater volume in the ends = a high PC. Less volume under water in the ends means less boat area underwater in the ends, ie. more tapered under water. A PC of 1.0 is not tapered in the ends at all- each slice of the loaf is the same area underwater. A PC of .49 is very fine, ie. very tapered - like an ocean kayak. ...
There's another interpretation of PC, and that's how big the maximum cross section is for a given volume (which, of course, means a constant weight for the vessel). A PC of 1 has the smallest maximum cross section area. As the PC drops, the maximum cross section has to increase to make up for the volume lost at the ends (or anywhere else).

I think this interpretation helps to make sense of why higher speed craft tend to have larger PCs. One would think that blunter ends would increase the wave drag, and they might, but there's a benefit to be had from the reduction in maximum cross section. At some point, the benefit from one is outweighed by the penalty from the other, hence there being an optimum PC that is a function of Froude number.
__________________
Tom Speer
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-14-2009, 12:45 AM
Mat-C Mat-C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rep: 109 Posts: 242
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by tspeer View Post
There's another interpretation of PC, and that's how big the maximum cross section is for a given volume (which, of course, means a constant weight for the vessel). A PC of 1 has the smallest maximum cross section area. As the PC drops, the maximum cross section has to increase to make up for the volume lost at the ends (or anywhere else).

I think this interpretation helps to make sense of why higher speed craft tend to have larger PCs. One would think that blunter ends would increase the wave drag, and they might, but there's a benefit to be had from the reduction in maximum cross section. At some point, the benefit from one is outweighed by the penalty from the other, hence there being an optimum PC that is a function of Froude number.
Tad eluded to something similar elsewhere.... do you have a reference, or an equation for determing the optimum PC?
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 09-27-2009, 09:37 AM
abhishek abhishek is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 33
Location: india
prisamatic coefficient = block coefficient of finess/mid ship area coefficient
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any idea about New hull Shape Prismatic Coef ? Erwan Multihulls 5 05-24-2009 06:25 PM
Prismatic coefficient for deep vee planing hull Mamaboo Boat Design 4 08-08-2008 06:35 PM
Cp - Prismatic Coefficient Fore & Aft idkfa Boat Design 20 09-15-2005 05:01 AM
Prismatic Coeff? SeaDrive Boat Design 5 02-19-2004 06:04 PM
Prismatic coeff... henrikb Boat Design 2 11-18-2003 11:35 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net