Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-10-2008, 08:52 PM
kilbysg's Avatar
kilbysg kilbysg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rep: 20 Posts: 38
Location: Philippines
Possible? or Impossible? "FLYING SUBMARINE"....

A ship that can submerged under the deepest sea like the submarine and can fly to outer space like the space shuttle...
Do we think in our kind of technology, someone could design or prove some research regarding with this "Flying Submarine"...
I know it is a silly imaginary concept coming from me, but...it's really fascinating if this is built for real....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2008, 09:23 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1211 Posts: 3,325
Location: maine
If it's heavy enough to sink, the air within must be compensated for, creating an average density heavier than 64 lbs per square foot. Steel, lead, etc..
That's real heavy. Say its the size of a car. A car might enclose about 180 cubic feet. That means a weight of maybe 12,000 lbs or so to sink in sea water.
Part of this would be a rocket powerful enough to launch the sub into space. The rocket would need to push the sub up to about 17,000 mph to reach escape velocity.
Something more powerful than our current rockets would be needed, however, as rocket fuel can barely push its own weight up into space without any payload----- the boosters they use are just about all fuel.
The shuttle itself is quite light, lighter I think than the sub would have to be.
Your sub would have to be very large, in other words, and it would have to jettison much of its weight prior to take-off (and I don't mean water but lead or something), and then also shed a couple of booster rockets too as it blasts its way up toward space.
Sort of a one trick pony costing billions.
How about plain old x-ray glasses? A lot more feasable and a load of fun at the beach.

Alan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2008, 09:43 PM
kilbysg's Avatar
kilbysg kilbysg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rep: 20 Posts: 38
Location: Philippines
Fun? Or Fly-Sub?

Fun at the beach is more fascinating using those cool glasses.

By the way, it would be really a large ship and really costs a billions of dollars or pounds or tons of resources.
Aside from rocket fuel, it may used a plutonium and uranium as a power turbine(that's an ingredient for a nuke).
and also the combination of getting it heavy on the water and getting it light on the atmosphere is a quite a bit to figure the structure of the ship...
A sort of project maybe, mostly for a lot of rocket scientists...

Kilby
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2008, 10:21 PM
charmc charmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 840 Posts: 2,391
Location: FL, USA
Any question is valid.

Possible in theory, super costly and unnecessary in reality.

That being said, noted science fiction author John Ringo has written several novels in which a nuclear submarine is modified to operate as a spacecraft. Of course, being science fiction, the sub-spaceship uses a black box power source that draws energy from the warped fabric of space-time .... you know the rest.

Like most hybrids, such a vessel would be not very good at either role, I suspect.
__________________
Best,

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2008, 10:41 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1211 Posts: 3,325
Location: maine
The biggest problem is miniaturizing the darned lenses so that you don't appear so obvious. If you get caught, you're "clamming", so get a clamming license just in case. Clamming---- everyone loves clammers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-10-2008, 11:41 PM
kilbysg's Avatar
kilbysg kilbysg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rep: 20 Posts: 38
Location: Philippines
Yah, i supposed to... and they wouldn't suspect me now that i am sneaking on them...harharhar
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:17 AM
charmc charmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 840 Posts: 2,391
Location: FL, USA
Have to agree. Miniaturizing lenses is easier than inventing a space-time warping engine, and x-ray glasses would be more fun.
__________________
Best,

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:46 AM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1211 Posts: 3,325
Location: maine
I don't know if you remember, Charlie, but years ago the comic books had an ad for x-ray glasses on the inside cover. The guy in the picture (who looks a lot like me) was at the beach staring at an innocent girl. He had this grin that said it all. It was a s*%t-eating grim in fact.
This ad was geared for ten year old boys. They must have sold millions of those glasses.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:59 AM
charmc charmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 840 Posts: 2,391
Location: FL, USA
Yeah, I remember those ads (OK, neither of us is a 20 something anymore ). Sounded really cool and lots of fun. There was this really pretty girl down the street from my house ...
__________________
Best,

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2008, 02:20 AM
kilbysg's Avatar
kilbysg kilbysg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rep: 20 Posts: 38
Location: Philippines
That's cool... any attractive girl you want to look at makes you grin...


Then, what if she did ask you? "Why were you grinning? Is there something wrong on my clothes?"..... heeh heeh heeh....

Last edited by kilbysg : 03-11-2008 at 02:21 AM. Reason: wrong spelling
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-11-2008, 04:58 AM
kach22i's Avatar
kach22i kach22i is offline
Architect
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 1067 Posts: 2,299
Location: Michigan
USO:
http://www.crystalinks.com/usos206.html

A UFO is an Unidentified Flying Object

A USO is an Unidentified Submerged (underwater) Object

Only the aliens know how to do this.
__________________
George: Architect (land lover type)
Hovercraft & Vintage Porsche Owner
http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/boa...ect-11973.html
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-11-2008, 09:28 AM
juiceclark juiceclark is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 71 Posts: 373
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Sure!

It's a piece of cake! Take Evinrudes old "Heli-Bout," switch to modern power sources and lightweight materials, waterproof and strengthen the canopy (and the rest of it) and you have a sub/boat/helicopter. Use stabilizer type fins for underwater steering instead of bouyancy.
Perhaps you could drop the old Evinrude 2-stroke from on high to destroy a bridge and hasten your getaway from the ambulance chasing attorneys.

View page 23:
http://www.fiberglassics.com/galleries/bitb/default.htm

http://sev.prnewswire.com/retail/200...6062007-1.html

Best of all, just like most things that try to do too much, it will do all things it was meant to do poorly! That means it will be collectable someday!

Tony in Sw FL
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-11-2008, 09:36 AM
jehardiman jehardiman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1758 Posts: 1,561
Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by charmc View Post
Any question is valid.

Possible in theory, super costly and unnecessary in reality.

That being said, noted science fiction author John Ringo has written several novels in which a nuclear submarine is modified to operate as a spacecraft. Of course, being science fiction, the sub-spaceship uses a black box power source that draws energy from the warped fabric of space-time .... you know the rest.

Like most hybrids, such a vessel would be not very good at either role, I suspect.
One of the things I have always pointed out is that it is far easier to build a spaceship than a submarine (less loads, better environment, etc). So once you have the submarine, it is just a matter of horsepower to make it fly. Von Braun had a nuclear rocket engine design (never built but pretty far into development), and once you are in low orbit an ion engine, gauss drive, or solar sail would work. So possible?..I would have to say yes, and has been so since the 1950's (Read Robert Heinlien's "Future History" series of short stories/novellas for some more background). But the cost...
__________________
A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-11-2008, 10:53 AM
Gannet's Avatar
Gannet Gannet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Rep: 36 Posts: 36
Location: Baltimore, MD
The idea of a Flying Sub is over a 100 years old

Jules Verne discuss this in his book "Master of the World"

And you all probably remember Irwin Allen's "Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea" Seaview had a flying sub the "FS-1"

Actually, I remember reading in a book (need to find and will post later) that this concept was investigated back in the 50's by Convair as an off-shoot of the SeaDart.

My thoughts it would have to be a large seaplane carrying a submersible or a submarine carrying a seaplane. Currently, as one vehicle if possible and affordable would have very lousy performance.

The hull would most likely have to be advanced composites and/or titanium. The propulsion/powerplant system is beyond my imagination.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-11-2008, 11:02 AM
jehardiman jehardiman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1758 Posts: 1,561
Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannet View Post
Actually, I remember reading in a book (need to find and will post later) that this concept was investigated back in the 50's by Convair as an off-shoot of the SeaDart.
__________________
A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CMD "project Zeus" VS VOLVO "IPS" gerard baladi Pod Drives 13 09-10-2007 09:23 PM
Boat "workshop" including a "testing tank" zmfmd Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 0 08-08-2007 04:43 AM
Westlawn ? "Lite" versus "Module 1" MikeT Education 2 10-10-2006 12:13 PM
"Free" 3D modeler "similar" to Rhino CGN Software 0 05-14-2006 10:56 PM
Drawing for Rhino of "Boat Racing Chair" and "Machine Gun" Vibtor Software 0 10-02-2004 02:03 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net