Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2012, 06:55 AM
stupidbaker57 stupidbaker57 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 35 Posts: 53
Location: Lakeville Ma
one prop shaft or two?

I'm working on a new project in my head. (hasn't made it to paper yet) I would like to build a small offshore racing boat. When I say small, I mean less than 14 feet.
Plans call for a tunnel hull with a surface drive of my design in each tunnel and powered by a single engine in the middle near the transom.
The plan is using cogged belts to drive the shafts. I have also designed a gear box to reverse one shaft since twin shaft must conter rotate.
The question I have is, what is the advantage of two shafts other than greater "bite" in the water? I know 2 shafts have twice the drag, but is there better performance with two than one?
This is just a head dream at the moment, so it will be easy to erase.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2012, 08:16 AM
tunnels tunnels is offline
old one !
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rep: 402 Posts: 1,913
Location: china is great and interesting !!
Why dont you build a central pod with just 1 shaft and prop Could Vee drive it and bring shaft back from the vee drive back to you surface drive !! worth thinking about and save on a few head aches and making a gear box .The pod could start quite small and shallow and get deeper as it goes aft whick with a tunnel is a good thing to help reduce and compress the air thats just going straight through the tunnel
__________________
Making beautiful boats is a passion never a chore !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2012, 11:12 AM
jehardiman jehardiman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1758 Posts: 1,561
Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA
Two props do not provide better performance than a single prop of larger diameter (141% of the twins). Dual shaft are used because: a) it is physically impossible or otherwise undesireable (draft usually) to fit a single large wheel, and b) redundency is a main requirement, such as a combatant or offshore come home capability (note: in this case the whole propulsion systems are seperate, not ganged shafts off a single engine).
__________________
A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2012, 11:40 AM
Submarine Tom's Avatar
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 937 Posts: 1,941
Location: North America (not USA and not Mexico but, below the 49th parallel, and on the Pacific coast)
My experience with 50 knot zodiac style boats is counter-rotating is really nice for take offs. That said, single props can be managed too but requires learned skill (ability, experience, whatever you want to call it) to launch straight. (It simply takes a twist of the wheel at the right moment, the right amount at the right tempo, on take off.)

So, I would go with single screw. Lighter, cheaper and in my opinion, better.

Now, you could go for contra-rotating on the same shaft...$$$$$

-Tom
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2012, 03:24 PM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1493 Posts: 7,447
Location: Milwaukee, WI
What is important to you is to understand surface propellers. Surface drive is a misnomer. A surface propeller can be attached to a variety of systems, including outboards. A "surface drive" can run a completely submerged propeller efficiently too is designed properly for the application.
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2012, 10:55 PM
messabout messabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 749 Posts: 1,314
Location: Lakeland Fl USA
A 14 foot offshore racer??? Fourteen foot boat and offshore are may not be mutually compatible terms except for ultra adventurous pilots.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-14-2012, 12:41 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by messabout View Post
A 14 foot offshore racer??? Fourteen foot boat and offshore are may not be mutually compatible terms except for ultra adventurous pilots.
i will second that. how fast do you think you will go in a fourteen footer at sea.
__________________
brendan .
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-14-2012, 01:42 AM
Stumble Stumble is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 599 Posts: 1,086
Location: New Orleans
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitepointer23 View Post
i will second that. how fast do you think you will go in a fourteen footer at sea.
Really fast until you hit the first wave and go airborne.
__________________
********************
Nothing is half so much fun as screwing around with boats, except screwing around in a boat.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-14-2012, 04:38 AM
daiquiri's Avatar
daiquiri daiquiri is offline
Engineering and Design
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 2574 Posts: 2,731
Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)
Quote:
Originally Posted by messabout View Post
Fourteen foot boat and offshore are may not be mutually compatible terms except for ultra adventurous pilots.
You can also call it a kamikaze pilot.

But, anyways... What is the top speed of the boat and the engine power? Then the torque - if you put a single prop you'll have to evaluate the effect of the torque on the handling and the stability of the boat.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-14-2012, 05:35 AM
stupidbaker57 stupidbaker57 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 35 Posts: 53
Location: Lakeville Ma
Just because I said offshore, doesn't mean ocean. I live on a lake 1 X 5 miles in size and my side of the lake is usually rough with waves 12 to 18 inches high and 5 or 6 feet apart.
Building an off shore style boat is for the looks. Single engine, twin screw is for the challenge, surface drive is because I can build them cheap ( because they're small).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-14-2012, 06:55 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by stupidbaker57 View Post
Just because I said offshore, doesn't mean ocean. I live on a lake 1 X 5 miles in size and my side of the lake is usually rough with waves 12 to 18 inches high and 5 or 6 feet apart.
Building an off shore style boat is for the looks. Single engine, twin screw is for the challenge, surface drive is because I can build them cheap ( because they're small).
fair enough. when you said offshore racing boat , i thought you mean't an offshore racing boat. my mistake. a small lake would suit what you are talking about but i can't see how the twin arrangement will work when the engine is up on the tunnel , won't the belts have to protrude into the tunnel.
__________________
brendan .
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:41 AM
stupidbaker57 stupidbaker57 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 35 Posts: 53
Location: Lakeville Ma
Correct. The belts would be arranged in an inverted V. The sponsons will be water tight forward of the shaft alley. If I go with my Arneson drive clone, then the shaft sprockets will be within 12 inches of the transom.
I'm thinking of a design simular to the one summitted by Masalai on the trimmable surface drive thread.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-15-2012, 04:32 AM
whitepointer23 whitepointer23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 247 Posts: 655
Location: australia
what sort of engine will you use.
__________________
brendan .
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-15-2012, 05:08 AM
stupidbaker57 stupidbaker57 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rep: 35 Posts: 53
Location: Lakeville Ma
I'm thinking of using a Subaru 4 cam motor. It's wide and low to help balance the hull. The exhaust exits out the bottom of the motor from each head. It's mainly aluminum, so it's light, and HP is around 150 stock.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-15-2012, 12:17 PM
Submarine Tom's Avatar
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 937 Posts: 1,941
Location: North America (not USA and not Mexico but, below the 49th parallel, and on the Pacific coast)
So, what way are you leaning, one prop or two?

-Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prop Shaft Systems. Dhutch Inboards 83 12-13-2009 01:41 AM
Prop shaft inclination amaurer Boat Design 15 10-20-2009 06:00 PM
Prop Shaft Removal mackie Inboards 0 07-12-2006 04:50 PM
Prop Shaft LADYLOVE Propulsion 0 04-30-2005 12:26 PM
Prop shaft vibration sailvayu Boat Design 0 02-21-2003 04:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net