Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2005, 10:41 AM
jerryah jerryah is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 4
Location: CHINA
Problems of inclining experiment calculation

Dear all,

Few questions regarding the inclining test calculation puzzles me for a long time. I need your expert direction now.
I try to work out test report of a 180m (Lbp) cargo carrier, the vessel have a 0.2m hogging and 1.35m trim (by strern) during test period. The draughts at midship & fore/aft perpendiculars are Df, Dm & Da. The sea water specific gravity is just equal to 1.025 (I need not consider the correction of different specific gravity, so luck), below are steps of part of my calculation.
1). do a hogging correction by (Df+6*Dm+Da)/8=Dmn
2). use even keel hydrostatic data sheet to find out the displacement (Disp1), TPC, MTC, KMT and LCF coresponding to Dmn.
3). do a displacement correction due to trim by (LCF/Lbp)*Trim*TPC*100
4). got the actual displacement under inclined condition

Ok, my question is
1) is that correct to use (Df+6*Dm+Da)/8 to get Dmn, because I've ever saw another formula (Df+4*Dm+Da)/6, which one is correct or both correct?
2) is that correct to get TPC, MTC, KMT and LCF corresponding to Dmn? The Dmn is draught at LCF or at Lbp/2? If it is draught at Lbp/2, need I corrected it to draught at LCF coresponding to actual trim?
3) is that correct to use even keel hydrostatic data to get these parameters mentioned in question 2) or I should use trimed hydrostatic data by interpolate method to get those parameters?

Thanks for any reply!!!

Last edited by jerryah : 11-30-2005 at 01:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2005, 01:50 AM
jerryah jerryah is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 4
Location: CHINA
surprise! nobody knows?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2005, 04:34 AM
JLL JLL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: SPAIN
Hi,
In my experience, I never use the Dmn. In the input data of my Hydrostatics software that I used to work , I introduce Df&Da , and the software runs with trimmed hydrostatics to calculate CoG
You could run with even keel hdrostatics at Dmn and compare with the trimmed hydrostatics. Differences is expected to occurs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2005, 05:49 AM
jerryah jerryah is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 4
Location: CHINA
Hi, JLL, thanks for your reply. But I'm really doubt that how your software consider the hogging correction. You know, for small vessel L<50m, normally they don't have obviously hogging. but for big vessel L>150m, 0.1~0.3m hogging is very normal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-30-2005, 07:07 AM
JLL JLL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: SPAIN
"have a 0.2m hogging " means initial list? If so, IMO procedure for inclining test accept a initial list not exceeding 0,5º. Due that we correct list by list weights in order not exceed above value, we introduce the mean value of port and starboard deflection. Our range boats are up to 30m length.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2005, 03:25 PM
Guillermo's Avatar
Guillermo Guillermo is offline
Ingeniero Naval
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep: 2041 Posts: 3,567
Location: Pontevedra, Spain
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLL
"have a 0.2m hogging " means initial list? ....
JLL:
Hog means : "Quebranto" and Sag: "Arrufo", in Spanish.


JERRYAH:
As a 1.35 m trim is less than 0.01*180, you may use the level hydrostatics.

I do not know about your Dmn calculation for hogging, either with 6 or 8 times the Dm.

I know about this correction:
"In cases the level trim hydrostatic data is used, a correction shall be made to Disp derived from the mean of Df and Da, as follows:
Cd = 0.75*(Dhs*TPC)
being Cd the correction to be found, and Dhs the measured hog (-) or sag (+) in centimetres." (TPC you already know)
I think this correction is all you need for your case.

I hope this may be of help.
__________________
Guillermo Gefaell
Moon Yacht Design
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:39 AM
JLL JLL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 11
Location: SPAIN
Guillermo: Thank you. I didn´t know the term. ¿Where are you?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2005, 07:12 PM
jerryah jerryah is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 4
Location: CHINA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guillermo
JLL:
......
Cd = 0.75*(Dhs*TPC)
being Cd the correction to be found, and Dhs the measured hog (-) or sag (+) in centimetres." (TPC you already know)
I think this correction is all you need for your case.
I hope this may be of help.
Hello, Guillermo,

it's pretty good to see your reply. I think you are very good at such calculation. regarding the "hogging correction", actually Cd = 0.75*(Dhs*TPC) is the exactly same correction way as "(1+6+1)/8.

I check a lot of class rules and IMO regulations. they all said if the trim is less than 1%Lbp, even keel hydrostatic values are acceptable for calculation. I want to get more accurate result. They suggest me to use ship model and loading software, but I don't understand, need I find out all hydrostatic data (LCB, MCT, KMT, TPC, LCF) base on the actual inclining condition?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2005, 08:47 PM
Guillermo's Avatar
Guillermo Guillermo is offline
Ingeniero Naval
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep: 2041 Posts: 3,567
Location: Pontevedra, Spain
JERRYAH
Yes, if you want to be more accurate, you should obtain the hydrostatic data at the inclining experiment condition, using the trimmed waterplane. But really, using the level trim data is good enough for your case's trim.
__________________
Guillermo Gefaell
Moon Yacht Design
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculation of GM Shidoran Boatbuilding 14 04-25-2006 04:19 AM
do any one have any emperical formula for calculation of BM sujith Boat Design 3 11-29-2005 07:13 AM
spreadsheet for towing calculation OF AHTS sujith Software 2 11-17-2005 05:39 AM
Free Propeller Calculation !!! propellerman Propulsion 0 03-25-2005 08:13 AM
I need a Lead Naval Architect or assigned Project Enginner ESG Services & Employment 12 11-06-2004 10:29 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net