Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-2007, 06:50 PM
mcollins07 mcollins07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 144 Posts: 202
Location: Texas
midship coefficient - Cm

I'm using freeship software which calculates a midship coefficient (Cm). Can you describe what this is and how it is used in design work?

thanks,
michael
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-22-2007, 07:35 PM
Raggi_Thor's Avatar
Raggi_Thor Raggi_Thor is offline
Nav.arch/Designer/Builder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 696 Posts: 2,457
Location: Trondheim, NORWAY
It's the area of the midship section (or the largest station) divided by the area of a rectangle with the same beam and draft. A rectangular barge with sharp corners will have 1 or 100% while a V bottom will have 0.5 or 50%.
If deplacement is midship area x length x prismatic coefficient
Depl=Am x Lwl x Cp,
and Am = Bwl x D
and Depl = Bwl x D x Lwl x Cb
then Cb = Am x Cp
__________________
Regards, Kvedja, mvh,
Ragnar Thor Mikkelsen
www.MBOATS.no
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-22-2007, 10:47 PM
mcollins07 mcollins07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 144 Posts: 202
Location: Texas
Cm = 1?

Raggi_Thor,
your definition makes sense, but the numbers that I get from FreeShip don't seem to fit. I'm working with a wedge. Thus, the midship section would always be a rectangle. Cm = Am / (Beam midsection x Draft midsection). Cm would always be 1? Freeship calculates zero for the flat bottom wedge. Freeship calculates from 0 to about .58 for a bottom with an upward sloping stern. Since the midship section is always a rectangle, shouldn't it always be one?
Attached Thumbnails
midship coefficient - Cm-narrow12-5pts-scale.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-23-2007, 06:50 AM
fcfc fcfc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 333 Posts: 678
Location: france,europe
The problem is the "midship" section definition.

Sometimes, it defines the section at the widest beam overall, or the widest waterline beam (raggi definition), or the station at 50% length (Freeship definition).

Cm may also refer to the section with the biggest undewater area. Which may be not the beamiest, neither the one at 50% len....

Last edited by fcfc : 01-23-2007 at 06:58 AM. Reason: One more thing to confuse ....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:53 AM
Raggi_Thor's Avatar
Raggi_Thor Raggi_Thor is offline
Nav.arch/Designer/Builder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 696 Posts: 2,457
Location: Trondheim, NORWAY
I think we have to ask Martinj about this :-)
__________________
Regards, Kvedja, mvh,
Ragnar Thor Mikkelsen
www.MBOATS.no
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-23-2007, 10:15 AM
SailDesign's Avatar
SailDesign SailDesign is offline
Old Phart! Stay upwind..
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 637 Posts: 1,720
Location: Jamestown, RI, USA
Michael,
At the risk of being perceived as EXTREMELY rude, can you check that your "bow" is indeed the bow? The only way you should be able to get those numbers would be if your wedge was out by 90degrees, and the bow is really the staboard beam.
Humour me....
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-24-2007, 02:42 AM
mcollins07 mcollins07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 144 Posts: 202
Location: Texas
Bow Orientation

Quote:
Originally Posted by SailDesign View Post
.. "bow" is indeed the bow? ...
Steve,
I did not find it in the manual, but my notes have that the X coordinate is the longitudinal direction and that the bow is the highest number. This is what I have.

One thing that I'm doing a little strange, I have the Loa = 1 meter. I'm looking at different scales and the unit of one is convenient.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2007, 06:16 AM
Raggi_Thor's Avatar
Raggi_Thor Raggi_Thor is offline
Nav.arch/Designer/Builder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 696 Posts: 2,457
Location: Trondheim, NORWAY
I looked at your picture again.
You have the Bmax at the stern, X=0.
What is the area of the hull (underewater) if you look at it from behind (or front)? That is not a vertical section (Dmax and Bmax is at different positions), but rather
Bmax X Dmax
How does this area compare to the midship section, X=0.5 ?
__________________
Regards, Kvedja, mvh,
Ragnar Thor Mikkelsen
www.MBOATS.no
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-26-2007, 03:16 AM
mcollins07 mcollins07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 144 Posts: 202
Location: Texas
After generating a new set of offsets in excel, the Cm results looked reasonable. Cm started at .7 and went down to .5 Must have been something wrong with my input as you suggested.

Are you defining Cm:

Cm = Area@midShip / Bmax x Dmax
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-26-2007, 04:45 AM
Raggi_Thor's Avatar
Raggi_Thor Raggi_Thor is offline
Nav.arch/Designer/Builder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 696 Posts: 2,457
Location: Trondheim, NORWAY
yes, that was a thought, in your case Bmax = Bmax_lwl.
__________________
Regards, Kvedja, mvh,
Ragnar Thor Mikkelsen
www.MBOATS.no
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speed coefficient chocomono Boat Design 4 02-03-2006 06:00 PM
i/o midship jackshaft systems tuttlec Propulsion 1 11-10-2005 11:50 PM
Hull coefficient Mirko Boat Design 5 10-10-2005 08:05 AM
Midship Section & Bending Moments Guest Boat Design 3 12-02-2004 04:38 PM
coefficient modification fradrigo Sailboats 0 12-02-2002 03:41 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net