| ||||
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Low planing speed Which hull design features produce high L/D ratios and low planing speeds |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Long, light and well balanced? You may have to be a little more specific in your question. The question "Which hull design features produce high L/D ratios?" is its own answer: high L and low D. Can you elaborate on what information you need, and/or why?
__________________ Matt Marsh M. B. Marsh Design The Marsh Fleet: Small-craft cruising on the waterways of Ontario and beyond |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| For the lowest possible planing speed you want the lowest possible weight per square area of useful lifting surface. Efficiency, once planing is actually achieved, is actually favored by low L/B-at the expense of other factors. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Light weight low powered dinghy, 10~11ft long, 350~400lbs total mass |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| A honeycomb door with an outboard planes at very low speeds
__________________ My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be. Also, my short-term memory's not as sharp as it used to be. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| A 10' - 12', 350 - 400 pound dinghy isn't light, unless you're counting crew weight too (still not light though). Dry hull weight for a taped seam skiff of that size could be in the 80 to 150 pound range with lower weights possible at a cost. How fast do you want to go and what dinghy are you playing with? If it's not a commonly understood model or a unique design, then images of some sort would be helpful. Landlubber, a 5 HP short shaft on a honeycomb door is a real flyer. Remove the knobs and hinges for better performance . . . |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Assuming the above, the ease of getting on plane at low speed rests on low bottom loading in lbs per square of planing contact area. What kind of loading are we looking at? I know that 25 lbs/ft sq will easily do the trick. Lower will be quicker and higher will still work. Well designed small sailboats meet this goal very easily and will move onto plane quickly at low speed ( in the hands of a skilled sailor, of course) . Powerboats have a harder time of getting loading this low, which is why most of them don't come close to planing at low speed. By low speed, I mean speed at or just above theoretical hull speed. There are lots of other factors that will always influence the design and no boat is built with your premise as the only goal. It's possible to add other little mods like transom wedges, trim tabs, steps, etc that will affect low speed planing ability but, in the end, weight is the most important single element of design and building. I add building to the equation because it is a lot harder and takes more attention to detail to build light than heavy. Edited to add: Calculating the actual bottom loading is a little obtuse though. There is the static loading which is the projected waterplane (area projected on a flat plane) and then there is the projected water contact area when the boat is on full plane. The latter is about 65% to 70% of the static area at low planing speed and far less at very high speed. When the boat is just starting to lift out, the load area varies from 100% to 70% when you can say that the boat is fully planing or almost all the weight is supported by dynamic rather than buoyancy forces. Confusing factors not withstanding, it's still light weight that wins out. ------------------------------------------- Landlubber, a 5 HP short shaft on a honeycomb door is a real flyer. Remove the knobs and hinges for better performance . . . Cute, Paul LOL
__________________ Tom Lathrop |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| PAR, wondered why i kept going around in circles, Ta mate.
__________________ My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be. Also, my short-term memory's not as sharp as it used to be. |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| Hey fellas, just a little hint, when i was younger i raced an outboard boat, we made the transom/hull corner edges razor sharp edges, and it increased the speed....normaally they are quite round about 3/8", especiallly in glass boats of course, but we made it seriously sharp and it worked well.
__________________ My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be. Also, my short-term memory's not as sharp as it used to be. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| That's an old trick 'Lubber. On our sailing dinghies as young men, we did the same thing, even taking it a step further and attaching pieces of aluminum angle, screwed to the edges of the transom, with the trailing edge sharpened. Of course, we eventually got caught and had to remove them, but it worked for a while. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low Speed Surfacing Propeller | dgruenwald | Surface Drives | 19 | 01-28-2010 11:16 AM |
| is a low aspect speed sailer an oxymoron | lunatic | Boat Design | 18 | 02-03-2008 10:24 PM |
| Lowest speed planing | yotphix | Boat Design | 16 | 12-23-2006 01:18 PM |
| Low power tunnel, low speed drive | robrohdeszudy | Propulsion | 9 | 12-23-2004 05:09 PM |
| Is this the right prop for this low speed inflatable? | bill fish | Powerboats | 0 | 07-30-2004 12:57 PM |