Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Wiki (beta)  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors  |  Sitemap

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2006, 01:25 PM
DavidG DavidG is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rep: 60 Posts: 52
Location: Chichester, England
Lightning Protection

I am working for a client who intends to keep his yacht in Chesapeake. There are numerous papers written on Lightning Protection and no two experts seem to agree. The paper that makes most sence to me is by Nigel Calder and was published in Professional Boatbuilder.

Firstly, Does anyone have a view as to whether it is better to ground to the keel (or in this case an iron ballast shoe) or to a sintered grounding plate? The lightning guys seem to think that the keel is best but the corrosion guys say don't bond to the keel. I have heard plenty of reports that the sintered plate can boil and blow through the hull during a lightning strike.

I also wonder whether by cathodically protecting the keel and fastenings, lightning might disipate through the bonded hull anode with the same results as the sintered grounding plate.

Secondly, The builder has fitted a lightning disipator (dish mop type). The VHF antenae is above the level of the disipator and a Glomex TV antenae is on a bracket outside the "cone of protection", this doesn't look good to me, any views of alternative arrangements? The yacht is sloop rigged.

DavidG
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2006, 05:41 PM
tom28571 tom28571 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rep: 256 Posts: 1,065
Location: Oriental, NC
It's a mystery. I have never seen a consensus agreement on the best ways to achieve lightning protection. Calder's advice is probably as good as any. The details of how to implement this on an individual boat is never very clear.

I am pretty certain of four things.

1. The "cone of protection" is a statistically arrived at phenomenon and not to be trusted too far.

2. Scintered copper plates are a marketing ploy that is based on wrongheaded science and, as you said, can be worse than a solid plate..

3. Ditto for the bristle brushes on the mast. They don't harm anything but are probably no better than a single wire.

4. Contrary to popular belief, lightning must be treated as very high frequency AC and not DC current even though the current may only flow one way. This is why sharp bends in any bonding wires must be avoided to keep inductive reactance to a minimum. Inductance will be resistance to the current flow and will make the lightning current want to go somewhere else. Same goes for running bonding wires near the hull interior below the waterline. Capacitance between a wire running along the inside and outside water is like a low resistance path through the hull to the water. Holes blown through hulls in this way have sunk many boats.

I am convinced that a good protection scheme is better than not having one although don't always know how to achieve that "good" scheme.
__________________
Tom Lathrop
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lightning strikes on steel boats? fulkne12 Boat Design 11 05-22-2006 02:20 AM
Suggestions on replacement deck (lightning sailboat) ldrumond Wooden Boat Building and Restoration 9 02-05-2005 01:39 AM
Lightning Strike Wynand N Sailboats 17 01-03-2005 05:18 AM
Lightning protection Seattle lite Sailboats 7 10-14-2004 10:50 AM
Patent Protection Fallacies. tom kane Open Discussion 4 05-26-2004 09:47 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin 3 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2009 Boat Design Net