Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-27-2007, 12:31 PM
witzgall witzgall is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 9
Location: Apex, NC
How would she ride in weather?

Hi all;

I am considering a particular boat that is an extreme, shallow draft cruiser. My wife and I have sailed on her once, in light air, and the boat was great.I wanted to open a discussion on how this vessel might perform in heavier air and large seas - as she was designed, or at least being marketed as a go anywhere cruising and bluewater boat. Particularly, I am concerned about tenderness, comfort and two-person managablility. Also, the boat has rack and pinion steering, is it possible to install an autopilot> She has selft steering, but I would like the option of an AP as well.

Here are some pictures of the boat:

http://www.witzgallphotography.com/images/salt

some specs: 64' mast height. Carbon and s-glass construction that is water tight.
26,400 disp.
13.6 beam
2.5' up, 8' down draft. Eliptical keel, 2500#, 7500# additional lead ballast in bilge
Chain is stored amidships, and kept out of the bow.
47' LOD, 50' LOA, 35'7" LWL

The owner said that the first reef goes in at ~10 knots, but she also will sail in under 5kts of wind. Cutter/Ketch rig, roughly 25% - 50% - 25% sail distribution.

Designed by Craig Walters, who did the Clearwater 35

Build quality is extremely high, Cold Molded.

Any ideas or comments?

Thanks,
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-27-2007, 01:11 PM
tom28571 tom28571 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rep: 1500 Posts: 1,681
Location: Oriental, NC
In order not to be sadly dissapointed you really need to try the boat out. Not to say that it won't do what is claimed but it is not likely that it will be as stiff as a fixed keel boat. Dick Carter and the French have done some similar swing keel offshore boats that have been acceptable.

The real question is whether you need the shallow draft. If not, I'd prefer more lead down low. Reefing at 10 is kind of a givaway.
__________________
Tom Lathrop
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2007, 02:16 PM
witzgall witzgall is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 9
Location: Apex, NC
Sail Area

She carries alot of sail, so I initially thought that was the reason for theearly reefing. I need to find out the actual SQFT.

The shalow draft is not my primary reason for being interested in the boat, but I can see it's advantages on the east coast and Bahamas.

I am most concerned how she does in seas over 6 ft and 25 kts. I am not sure if I could be lucky enough to get a test sail in those conditions, but it is theoretically possible.

Here is the layout and profle drawings:


Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2007, 03:05 PM
tom28571 tom28571 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rep: 1500 Posts: 1,681
Location: Oriental, NC
Chris,

I kinda like the look of the boat. With 7500# internal and with the profile as shown it looks like here is not much in the way of a bilge except under the engine. A ballast/displacement ratio of about 38% is on the
high side so it may be stiffer, after initial heel, than it at first appeared. Also the rig gives lots of variation in sail area for helm balance.

Still, since the boat is probably not cheap, a survey including stability test is in order and a qualified NA to run the stability numbers would be good too.

I'm ready for a sail and live in a shallow water area.
__________________
Tom Lathrop
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2007, 04:33 PM
Vega's Avatar
Vega Vega is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 127 Posts: 1,606
Location: Portugal
"A ballast/displacement ratio of about 38% is on the
high side so it may be stiffer, after initial heel, than it at first appeared. Also the rig gives lots of variation in sail area for helm balance".


That's about the same Ballast/displacement of the typical French “Deriveur” and they don't have ballast in the keel. But they are beamier and have more form stability and that gives them more initial stability. Probably this boat will have a better reserve stability than the French ones, but I agree with Tom about having more information about the boat stability. It is a nice boat, but a boat that takes in the first reef with 10k of wind is ...unusual. How many reefs have the sail?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-27-2007, 08:47 PM
witzgall witzgall is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 9
Location: Apex, NC
2 reefs, described by the owner in the position that would correspond to a 1.5 and 3 reef point.

I always took the early reefing as sign that a large sail area could be set in light winds. but I am a bit sceptical. How much of this is large sail area, and how much is becuase of possible lower stability?

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2007, 08:51 PM
longliner45 longliner45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 505 Posts: 1,637
Location: Ohio
not to be rude,,but by looking at her lack of low ballast,this may not be the boat you are looking for to travel offshore in
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-27-2007, 08:54 PM
tom28571 tom28571 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rep: 1500 Posts: 1,681
Location: Oriental, NC
Chris,

Don't give up on the boat over our ruminations. It could be just great for your use. I gotta leave early tomorrow for Florida to get to the launching of the Everglades Challenge fleet in St Petersburg so won't be around much for a couple weeks. I'll be interested in the outcome.
__________________
Tom Lathrop
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2007, 08:07 PM
longliner45 longliner45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 505 Posts: 1,637
Location: Ohio
I keep looking at this boat ,and I really am starting to like it ,how old is this design?Im not big of swing keels or rudders in back,but she looks well built otherwise. low to the water ,I do like the prop skeg . longliner
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2007, 08:50 AM
witzgall witzgall is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 9
Location: Apex, NC
age

She was built in 1991. Many times I have written her off - too much boat for us, matainance, etc. But I keep coming back to her as a possible purchase. Kind of infectious, really. I love her lines, and although the layout is not typical of a crusiing boat, it has grown on me as well. The only thing I woul likely want to change right away is seeing if the running backstays on the mainmast could be changed out for stationary ones. I don't want to deal with them on a cruising boat.

I just worry what she would be like in rally nasty weather.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-01-2007, 10:21 AM
Vega's Avatar
Vega Vega is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 127 Posts: 1,606
Location: Portugal
Quote:
Originally Posted by witzgall View Post
2 reefs, described by the owner in the position that would correspond to a 1.5 and 3 reef point.
It makes no sense. I mean if that is the reef arrangement, to take the first reef at 10k of wind, unless the owner is a very cautious sailor and take the first reef in when the boat heels more than 15º .

Narrow boats take a lot of heeling while sailing and that is normal. Go and have a test sail. Probably that story is not well told.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-01-2007, 10:33 AM
water addict water addict is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Rep: 73 Posts: 312
Location: maryland
I like the looks of the boat. If going offshore, my concern would be fixing the keel in place in case of a rollover, if you are to do extensive offshore work. Don't want that keel slamming back into the hull and breaking free if you are upside down.
As far as the overall stability, pay a rule measurer to do an inclining test to locate the VCG. Then you can estimate the hull shape, which one can do nowadays pretty quickly in a boat design package, pretty dern close to the actual hull. Plot out the righting arm curve to get an idea of the stability behavior at sea, compare to righting arm curves in numerous texts or articles to see if it is stable enough for your purposes.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-01-2007, 10:45 AM
Crag Cay Crag Cay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 572 Posts: 635
Location: UK
Yes, having someone look at it properly is the only way. It wouldn't be cheap unless you could do a lot of the measurement work yourself.

Once you have the shape of the boat, its true displacement and CofG in the computer, an answer to your concerns would be quickly forthcoming. If you do get it done, make sure the downflooding points are inputed accurately and the boat is heeled to starboard in the hydrostatics software as it has an offset companionway.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-01-2007, 11:21 AM
witzgall witzgall is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 9
Location: Apex, NC
Perhaps I could track down the designer, Craig Walters. Anyone know where he is these days?

Chris

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crag Cay View Post
Yes, having someone look at it properly is the only way. It wouldn't be cheap unless you could do a lot of the measurement work yourself.

Once you have the shape of the boat, its true displacement and CofG in the computer, an answer to your concerns would be quickly forthcoming. If you do get it done, make sure the downflooding points are inputed accurately and the boat is heeled to starboard in the hydrostatics software as it has an offset companionway.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weather data jocki Projects & Proposals 0 01-24-2007 02:04 PM
Ride comfort in power tris marshmat Multihulls 6 08-21-2006 05:16 PM
Stiletto Stealth Ships: Look Different. Ride Different. kach22i Boat Design 5 02-27-2006 12:49 PM
Beam vs. Ride Blue heron Boat Design 8 01-24-2005 02:22 PM
Bottom modification, addition of "ride-pad", and or lifting strake extension or addit Larry Farr Boatbuilding 1 08-01-2001 05:31 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net