Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2010, 09:56 PM
Boston's Avatar
Boston Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rep: 1457 Posts: 3,355
Location: Denver Co
How not to drive your NA nuts

to many cooks in the kitchen syndrome

most of you know what Im up to
ok so I've finally picked the boat and finally picked an NA.

Now given that I've learned just about enough to be dangerous and given that we have a diverse and opinionated group I hope you folks will forgive me if the following stages prior to the actual building process are not open to public debate. Sorry kids but the few and relatively minor changes I plan on making are going to be considered for feasibility and inclusion by one person from here on out.

I'll begin posting the build once its actually started, which might be sooner than you think cause the changes I'm considering are minor, or at least I think they are.

sorry for the silence at this stage but its the only way to let my NA do his job efficiently

cheers
B
__________________
I am skeptical of the deniers diatribe
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2010, 12:38 AM
duluthboats's Avatar
duluthboats duluthboats is offline
Senior Dreamer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rep: 771 Posts: 1,580
Location: Arlington, WA, USA
Sounds like a good way to build a boat. (not talk about it) Looking forward to pics.
Gary
__________________
"The hand feeds the mind."
Weston Farmer
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2010, 06:42 AM
rwatson's Avatar
rwatson rwatson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1188 Posts: 2,397
Location: Tasmania,Australia
Good luck. My first NA was given a brief - "A boat like the one at www.######, only longer and a bigger cabin" (26 to 28ft, 1200 kilo trailer sailer)

Three months later I got a design that looked nothing like I requested, was twice as heavy with a third the performance characteristics of the original.

I find you have to keep reminding the NA of the brief, the fine points of the design, keep emphasising the extra features - or they just forget over the months and other pressing projects.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2010, 08:18 AM
daiquiri's Avatar
daiquiri daiquiri is offline
Engineering and Design
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 2574 Posts: 2,731
Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwatson View Post
Three months later I got a design that looked nothing like I requested, was twice as heavy with a third the performance characteristics of the original.
I find you have to keep reminding the NA of the brief, the fine points of the design, keep emphasising the extra features - or they just forget over the months and other pressing projects.
Naaah, I think you might have been just unlucky or have agreed too broad design goals.

A serious designer might miss few previously agreed features (design compromises will have to happen, sooner or later...), but it will be him to advice you if and when it happens. And it will be long before the design enters the executive stage. A very experienced NA, the one with a good database of similar existing projects in his drawer, will anticipate the problems of the kind you've mentioned at the very preliminary design stage.
Nobody likes doing the same job all over again, the second time for free, you know...

That's, of course, unless you have asked him to add stuff along the way, which happens pretty often in this world.


P.S.
I need to point out that this is not intended as a criticism of either your designer's work or your SOR, I am just saying that when overweight designs happen, most of the times they are childern of both parents - the designer and the client.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2010, 07:45 PM
Willallison's Avatar
Willallison Willallison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rep: 2319 Posts: 3,502
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by daiquiri View Post
Naaah, I think you might have been just unlucky or have agreed too broad design goals.

A serious designer might miss few previously agreed features (design compromises will have to happen, sooner or later...), but it will be him to advice you if and when it happens. And it will be long before the design enters the executive stage. A very experienced NA, the one with a good database of similar existing projects in his drawer, will anticipate the problems of the kind you've mentioned at the very preliminary design stage.

That's, of course, unless you have asked him to add stuff along the way, which happens pretty often in this world.
Nobody likes to do the same job all over again, the second time for free, you know...

P.S.
I need to point out that this is not intended as a criticism of either your designer's work or your SOR, I am just saying that when overweight designs happen, most of the times they are childern of both parents - the designer and the client.
What truly intrigues me is how commonly I encounter a resistance on the clients part to prepare a clear and consistent design brief (SOR). As if, by magic, the designer can conjure up exactly what the client wants by nothing more than telepathic extraction. No - it's not as mjuch fun as drawing pretty sketches of boats, but it IS a very necessary 1st step.
Of course, preparing an effective SOR should be a joint effort between both designer and client and any designer who proceeds too far along the path before ensuring that the SOR has been finalised and AGREED TO BY BOTH PARTIES is asking for trouble.
Just as daiquiri did... my disclaimer... no suggestion that this was the case in RW's case... just a general observation....

Oh - and congrats and good luck B !!
__________________
Will
Imaginocean Yacht Design
Logic will get you from A to B... Imaginocean will take you everywhere else...
www.imaginocean.net
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-20-2010, 08:04 PM
Boston's Avatar
Boston Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rep: 1457 Posts: 3,355
Location: Denver Co
thats funny cause I been trying to create a clear and consistent list of the least number of alterations I can live with
__________________
I am skeptical of the deniers diatribe
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2010, 08:31 PM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,372
Location: Maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston View Post
to many cooks in the kitchen syndrome

most of you know what Im up to
ok so I've finally picked the boat and finally picked an NA.

Now given that I've learned just about enough to be dangerous and given that we have a diverse and opinionated group I hope you folks will forgive me if the following stages prior to the actual building process are not open to public debate. Sorry kids but the few and relatively minor changes I plan on making are going to be considered for feasibility and inclusion by one person from here on out.

I'll begin posting the build once its actually started, which might be sooner than you think cause the changes I'm considering are minor, or at least I think they are.

sorry for the silence at this stage but its the only way to let my NA do his job efficiently

cheers
B
I hope to choose Tad.
Look forward to see some pictures.
Good luck.
Daniel
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-20-2010, 08:41 PM
Boston's Avatar
Boston Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rep: 1457 Posts: 3,355
Location: Denver Co
lets not make a guessing game of it Daniel
all I know is I was lucky my first pick agreed to the job
or at least I think he has
come to think of it I did sorta randomly send him a check
I'm feeling pretty good that I got the right guy on the job but I think it best not to make the design phase to public and having to much input

I just fired off about a 12 or 15 sentence list of changes
2 that I really want
2 I'd kinda like to see but no big deal if not
1 might be dreaming

I can think of another but I'm almost positive its to expensive so I left it out

but I kept it really simple and asked for an estimate on each group so I can mull it over for a while and then send him the appropriate amount of money to get things rolling

lets not preasure the guy ok
it this turns into a who is it thread I'll have to ask Jeff to deal with it accordingly cause I dont want to be any more trouble than I already have been

time to get professional about this

sorry Daniel
no can do my friend
__________________
I am skeptical of the deniers diatribe
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-20-2010, 09:09 PM
troy2000's Avatar
troy2000 troy2000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rep: 1686 Posts: 1,240
Location: California
OK, so why are we even talking about not talking about this stage? If you hadn't mentioned it, we'd have no idea it was happening.

But I hope it goes well; we'll be waiting to see what you and the NA come up with.
__________________
"All one has to do is follow the plans and build in no permanent leaks."
-Charles Minor Blackford, on the simplicity of building flat bottomed boats
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-20-2010, 09:33 PM
Boston's Avatar
Boston Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rep: 1457 Posts: 3,355
Location: Denver Co
I was kinda thinking no one would respond once they knew what was up
I been pretty prolific in my conversation about the build and I kinda figured I give an update every once in a while

didn't mean to start a who dun it page

cheers
B
__________________
I am skeptical of the deniers diatribe
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-20-2010, 10:58 PM
rwatson's Avatar
rwatson rwatson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1188 Posts: 2,397
Location: Tasmania,Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by daiquiri View Post
Naaah, I think you might have been just unlucky or have agreed too broad design goals.

.......

P.S.
I need to point out that this is not intended as a criticism of either your designer's work or your SOR, I am just saying that when overweight designs happen, most of the times they are childern of both parents - the designer and the client.
Yes, it can happen that way.

As it turns out, I have dealt with two NA's in my efforts to get a design done. The first one was just sheer pig-headedness on the part of the first NA, as I have spoken to other disgruntled clients of his since.

The second has made excellent progress, but need to be kept "freshened up" constantly, as i am sure he has a lot of other distractions.

In both cases, and itemised, detailed list SOR was provided.

Like getting an initial sketch with CE and CG showing, but the SOR item
"Self Tacking" was ignored, and all the calcs had been done with an overlapping foresail.

The same goes for the specification of a "half metre bowsprit"

How unambious could that be - but they just didnt register.

Half the battle is getting the designer really interested in your project, and not just looking at it as another job.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stainless Nuts & Bolts* WickedGood Marketplace 3 05-24-2010 12:41 PM
Stainless Nuts & Bolts NEWENGLAND Marketplace 0 05-21-2009 03:06 PM
flipping lug (lug nuts) Timothy Sailboats 3 05-09-2009 07:25 PM
Matrials for Keel Bolts/Nuts C3PU Materials 4 07-21-2004 10:16 PM
Lap Strake Nuts, CC Skiffs Captn_Pea Wooden Boat Building and Restoration 5 10-31-2003 06:30 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net