Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:22 AM
FAST FRED FAST FRED is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 756 Posts: 3,328
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big dock & room for O'nite stop .
Simple rule,

Going faster costs more than going slow!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-24-2011, 09:05 AM
Frog4's Avatar
Frog4 Frog4 is offline
Proletariat
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rep: 12 Posts: 150
Location: Arizona desert
Quote:
Originally Posted by daiquiri View Post
The data in my spreadsheet come from existing ships from 4 actual navies and they clearly show that the "rule" and the following claim
"We observed, that on Navy Ships the General Dimensions (Monohull-SemiDisp/Displ - round bilge) appears a strong relation between LOA and Beam that based in a function (etc...)"
has no basis in the real world, where physics and SORs (and not mystic ratios and formulas) are what determine the shape of a ship.
If it's the form of my reply, and not the substance, that bothered you, then I'm sorry it has bothered you. Sometimes a person feels a need to double-underline his disapproval of unbacked and misleading claims.
I understand your data ... and you backed it up with sources ... I was referring to Alder's data ... and the "form of your reply" kinda knee jerk response ... all is well ... hoping Alder chimes in with the source(s) used for his graph
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-24-2011, 09:06 AM
Frog4's Avatar
Frog4 Frog4 is offline
Proletariat
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rep: 12 Posts: 150
Location: Arizona desert
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAST FRED View Post
Simple rule,

Going faster costs more than going slow!
unless you're being chased by a LION
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:48 PM
rwatson's Avatar
rwatson rwatson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1188 Posts: 2,397
Location: Tasmania,Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog4 View Post
I understand your data ... ... and the "form of your reply" kinda knee jerk response ... all is well ... hoping Alder chimes in with the source(s) used for his graph
I would hesitate to call Daiquiri's response as a "knee jerk"

I personally appreciate his fast, fact based analysis in an effort to repudiate the kind of irrational assertations that plague the public forum of the web in general, and occasionally in this site.

Both Daiquiri and I spotted the 'bogus theorem', based on experience within this forum over the years. We will never see Alders data. It was pushing a philosophical barrow not based on fact.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:51 PM
rwatson's Avatar
rwatson rwatson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1188 Posts: 2,397
Location: Tasmania,Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAST FRED View Post
Simple rule,

Going faster costs more than going slow!
I wonder if that is always the case. Take a Hydrofoil Ferry that chews up juice at normal speed, but can deliver twice the passengers (doubling its income) in the same time when going fast enough to 'foil' ?

Or even more basic - why are nearly all commercial ships fuel burning and not sail ?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:54 PM
water addict water addict is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Rep: 73 Posts: 312
Location: maryland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adler View Post
Dear All,

We observed, that on Navy Ships the General Dimensions (Monohull-SemiDisp/Displ - round bilge)
appears a strong relation between LOA and Beam that based in a function (regression 0.97)
where the constant ϕ is involved:

LOA= (B^F) /ϕ where F=ϕ^ϕ and for ϕ=1,61803398874989
then F= 2.17845756793758
.

The matter comes from dreadnought type to nowadays.
We have to note that as Frog4 put the subject on the table.
Nope.
Numbers don't work out, sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-26-2011, 04:02 AM
Northman Northman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 137 Posts: 73
Location: Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by daiquiri View Post
Total and complete nonsense. Looks like you didn't even bother to check your theories against data of existing ships.

Here is a capture of a spreadsheet with LOA and B data of several ship classes from various navies around the world, together with a graph where these data are shown as points. In the same graph there is a line given by your mystic formula. Now you tell me what relationship can you see between that line and the data from real ships?

Attachment 62868


Your attachment lacks the connection with the real world - see the above graph.
Great post! Thanks to Daiquiri for being alert as well as for clear language backed up by documented facts!
Walter
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mathematical boat design method Wayne Grabow Boat Design 15 01-09-2009 09:40 PM
Silence is Golden FAST FRED Boat Design 8 10-21-2006 04:37 AM
Mathematical Q. about theoretical max boatspeed... Sailboats 25 10-11-2004 08:12 PM
Need help with cruise ship mathematical formulas cmc Boat Design 4 12-11-2003 11:30 PM
Mathematical definition of Boat planing astoffel0531 Boat Design 29 10-30-2003 03:08 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net