Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Most Recent Posts Gallery Images Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-02-2008, 04:49 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 257
Location: Tasmania, Australia
coverting a racing boat to a cruiser

Hi everybody,

I saw this late 1970s 46 ft S&S designed racer for sale and was wondering whether it would make a good cruising boat.

It won the Sydney to Hobart on handicap in 1983, and I daresay will cost a pretty penny to convert.

I am curious about the behaviour, seakindliness and stability of this era racing boat, and would appreciate any information you may have.

Thanks in a advance.
__________________

If you don't change tack, you will end up where you are heading.
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 06-02-2008, 04:55 AM
Meanz Beanz Meanz Beanz is offline
Boom Doom Gloom Boom
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 585 Posts: 2,286
Location: Lower East ?
If its an IOR influenced boat I would probably avoid it. They typically had big beam and pinched in ends and don't deliver the off the breeze handling that I personally would be looking for in a cruising yacht. Many had a strong tendency to want to turn around and go the other way in following conditions, at least that's my experience of them. Also you have rigs with inline spreaders, running back stays etc. Major things that you really have to alter to make a hassle free safe cruiser.

Thats just my opinion, many have been converted and cruised successfully but I suspect the money could have been better spent.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-2008, 05:11 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 257
Location: Tasmania, Australia
I am still to find out what the displacement is.

Yes you are right: the boat has a fractional rig with inline spreaders and running backstays. Although from the photos she does not seem to have excessively pinched ends, Beam to length is a modest 2.9
__________________

If you don't change tack, you will end up where you are heading.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-2008, 05:57 AM
Meanz Beanz Meanz Beanz is offline
Boom Doom Gloom Boom
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 585 Posts: 2,286
Location: Lower East ?
Got a link to some pictures? Somebody here might know it and be able to clue you in abit.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-02-2008, 06:00 AM
Meanz Beanz Meanz Beanz is offline
Boom Doom Gloom Boom
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 585 Posts: 2,286
Location: Lower East ?
Challenge II ? You could just phone Lou Abrahams up and ask him how she handled. She looks like she'd be OK downwind, not a really cranky looking IOR boat. I'd guess you would want to make the rig swept back spreaders, that would mean moving bulkheads or building new internal support for chainplates. You might want to cut the rig down while you are at it, at least she is fractional and the headsails are small. Maybe you could make her a smaller masthead and keep the spreaders inline, need an NA to comment on that one, might not be wise to alter the balance of the rig that much. Aluminum can be a bit of a bother with electrolysis and you can't use the longer life copper antifouls, also a bother for a cruiser. Sounds like the engine has hydraulic drive of some sort, again maybe a bit on the complex side for a crusier.... KISS and all that.

She's a nice looking boat for an IOR machine, grown a foot to I notice

You also would have to get an opinion of how the boat would handle the extra weight. Keep in mind she was designed to be a certain weight and many decisions where made based on that information. Adding a few tons of cruising equipment changes that and may mean that other things need to be done to do the convert properly or that its just not wise to do.

Any designers with opinions on that here?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-02-2008, 06:52 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 257
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Yep, that's the boat. I don't have his number!
I have estimated the displacement to be ~ 16T
Attached Thumbnails
coverting a racing boat to a cruiser-0_3al.jpg  
__________________

If you don't change tack, you will end up where you are heading.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-02-2008, 07:04 AM
Meanz Beanz Meanz Beanz is offline
Boom Doom Gloom Boom
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 585 Posts: 2,286
Location: Lower East ?
Try leave a message via the CYC...

http://www.cyca.com.au/newsDetail.asp?key=2928

Ya never know he might return the call (I'm assuming he is still kicking!)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-02-2008, 07:09 AM
Meanz Beanz Meanz Beanz is offline
Boom Doom Gloom Boom
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 585 Posts: 2,286
Location: Lower East ?
I notice she is 8' deep, also pretty deep for a cruiser. You could alter that if you altered the rig (bulb keel?)... but its getting into drastic change territory!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-02-2008, 07:20 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 257
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Thanks Meanz Beanz,

I appreciate the advice. Yes, cruising on her racing lines is the problem.

Beats me how people convert racing boats, if they have to cruise these boats on their designed lines?

I thought aluminium was a great material for cruising boats. Her last survey says she is in sound condition.
__________________

If you don't change tack, you will end up where you are heading.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-02-2008, 07:32 AM
Meanz Beanz Meanz Beanz is offline
Boom Doom Gloom Boom
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 585 Posts: 2,286
Location: Lower East ?
I think aluminium is fine just so long as its been treated well and you keep electrolysis in mind when doing what ever it is you will do to the boat. The only draw back I can think of is the last time I checked suitable antifoul was very short life. Maybe thats better now?

If you add less than you are likely to spend on her to the purchase price it opens up quite a few already complete alternates. Check out the "Racer/Cruiser Sloop 48ft" for 135K... looks intriguing!

I reckon they are a little like 10 year old F1 cars, good for a blat around the track if you can afford to keep them going but don't hitch a caravan upto one!

Cheers & CYA

BeanZ
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-02-2008, 07:41 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 257
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Yea, very nice eh. Thanks again, and cya.
__________________

If you don't change tack, you will end up where you are heading.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-25-2008, 06:20 AM
diwebb diwebb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Rep: 65 Posts: 122
Location: New Zealand
Hi, if worried about the draft and wanting to reduce it check where the center of gravity is for the keel, most IOR boats had quite a high keel center of gravity, usually about a third of the keel depth below the hull if they are a solid lead fin as many of them were. If you design a hollow keel stem with a bulb or wing ballast appendage at the bottom you may find that you will get a better righting moment with less draft and a space for an additional fuel tank which always comes in useful on a cruising boat. You could even save some weight on the keel, I recently converted a 27 foot boat from a fixed IOR style keel to a drop keel, admittedly I went from 4 foot six to six foot six draft but the weight went from 1400 pounds to 400 pounds and the righting moment increased by about 15%. The boat now comes in at less than a ton.
Reply With Quote


  #13  
Old 06-25-2008, 11:24 AM
charmc charmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 840 Posts: 2,391
Location: FL, USA
Several 12 meter America's Cup boats have been converted successfully to cruiser service. I suspect that the budgets were large, though, which is probably the key. It can be done, but for those of us constrained by the real world the money might be better spent on something originally built as a fast cruiser.
__________________
Best,

Charlie
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Depowering racing boat JackW Sailboats 12 12-18-2007 03:41 PM
26' Offshore Racing Boat?....anyone know this boat Good n Plenty Boat Design 1 12-21-2006 06:10 PM
Boat racing Sched khasmoth Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 0 12-11-2006 04:55 AM
Coverting an I/O into an outboard with an extension hawaiifishin Powerboats 10 09-09-2005 12:05 AM
racing offshore boat plan DIREKTOR Boatbuilding 2 01-31-2003 06:41 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2014 Boat Design Net