Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #496  
Old 11-17-2009, 08:20 AM
apex1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by safffff View Post
I have followed Willmer for 4 yrs. Apex is good to question. But is not the ultimate goal is to succeed in this project. No one including apex is willing to put up the testing dollars of constructing destroyable subs and sure there are concrete compounds that are 5 time stronger. but is this man of vision anything less than Orville Wright that had many aspect of flying incorrect. By creating one sub for a costumer is not a profit making adventure. This thread should be dedicated to progressing this technology. All the attacks are useless in helping this move forward. I want a sub that that can take 50,000psi economically built but no billionaire is offering an X prize to do so. So criticize as you may you aren't helping to advance this goal. I imagine a hull of multiple spheres with the new concrete materials can do this. I suspect that people like apex want to stop his research proved by his inability to come up with innovated ways to help Willmer surpass his dreams, because I've not seen one creative idea from him to help this progress. People lets dream to get this done and a compressible substance like concrete, ceramic that gets stronger under pressure is the way to go. Willmer I'm in San Fransisco and would consider it a honor to help your new sub along with any labor help you need as I would have offered to the Wright brothers.
.

What a bullsh... is that?

Has your hero done ONE single effort to get support? Did we ask him 20 times to tell us just only the material he uses?

Was´nt more than half of the contributors here willing to assist? ME INCLUDED

But when the only reply is salesmens drivel, and drivel, and drivel again, but not one single figure, what do you expect?

Did you step in here to attack ME exclusively, or do you have any worthwile contributions to supply?

You should kill the bugs btw. they can transfer severe diseases.......
  #497  
Old 11-17-2009, 10:40 AM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,363
Location: Maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by safffff View Post
I have followed Willmer for 4 yrs. Apex is good to question. But is not the ultimate goal is to succeed in this project. No one including apex is willing to put up the testing dollars of constructing destroyable subs and sure there are concrete compounds that are 5 time stronger. but is this man of vision anything less than Orville Wright that had many aspect of flying incorrect. By creating one sub for a costumer is not a profit making adventure. This thread should be dedicated to progressing this technology. All the attacks are useless in helping this move forward. I want a sub that that can take 50,000psi economically built but no billionaire is offering an X prize to do so. So criticize as you may you aren't helping to advance this goal. I imagine a hull of multiple spheres with the new concrete materials can do this. I suspect that people like apex want to stop his research proved by his inability to come up with innovated ways to help Willmer surpass his dreams, because I've not seen one creative idea from him to help this progress. People lets dream to get this done and a compressible substance like concrete, ceramic that gets stronger under pressure is the way to go. Willmer I'm in San Fransisco and would consider it a honor to help your new sub along with any labor help you need as I would have offered to the Wright brothers.

.
What a BS here. Is Wellmer ask you to wrote that crap, or you are Wellmer under an other name.
Who are you kidding.
It didn't work, go back to Columbia, and stop lying Wellmer.
And stop asking for money (the underlying ultimate goal of your non project)
Daniel
Contrary to you I sign whet I wrote with my real name.

Last edited by dskira : 11-17-2009 at 10:41 AM. Reason: Spelling what eles with me
  #498  
Old 11-17-2009, 10:47 AM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,363
Location: Maine
By the Safffff or Wellmer it is starnge that all your 10 posts are about the same non existant concrete crap.
Do you think we are stupid.
An other guy from SF try that crap, it didn't work.
You are worst that I imagined Wellmer, inventing support.
Then attacking only Richard, you poor moroon go back to your cave. I don't like obviously dishonest people
Daniel
  #499  
Old 11-17-2009, 10:51 AM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,363
Location: Maine
Stafffff Wellmer, we don't need people like you, trying to take money for a fake submarine.
It is an insult to mention the Wright Brother on your stupid post, you are not by far in the same league.
Daniel

Last edited by dskira : 11-17-2009 at 10:52 AM. Reason: Guess why
  #500  
Old 11-17-2009, 11:31 AM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,363
Location: Maine
I wonder if the Wellmer concrte sustain this kind of acid abuse:
  #501  
Old 11-17-2009, 12:38 PM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,363
Location: Maine
Wellmer or Saffffffffff I have the bug for you too
  #502  
Old 11-17-2009, 12:46 PM
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 777 Posts: 1,546
Location: Victoria BC Canada
Saffff,

It was me who suggested the destructive test, not Apex.

I agree with you that this thread is highly polarized and not very

constructive. This is one reason I proposed the destructive test to put an

end to all the useless drivel from BOTH sides of the arguement.

I too was on-side with Wellmer. I even became the North American sales

representative but when he repeatedly failed to communicate with me as to

how I could further his cause and assist him here while he spent an

abundance of time and energy arrogantly defending his unsubstantiated

claims, I felt it time for him to put his money where his mouth was.

He disappeared.

He is a fraud, a fake, a talker and talk is cheap until you get the bill.

He's over due...

-Tom
  #503  
Old 11-17-2009, 01:37 PM
apex1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submarine Tom View Post
Saffff,

It was me who suggested the destructive test, not Apex.

He is a fraud, a fake, a talker and talk is cheap until you get the bill.

He's over due...

-Tom
Thank Tom,

both not worth the effort I think. Same caliber, big bullet, no powder.

And both do´nt know the simplest rule of life: do´nt sh!t where you eat!

A pity to hear you wasted time and money with such idiot!

Regards
Richard
ah and do´nt kill the bug, thats Wilfried...
  #504  
Old 11-17-2009, 03:38 PM
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 777 Posts: 1,546
Location: Victoria BC Canada
Richard,

You make me laugh, thank you.

I like Wilfred the bug!

-Tom
  #505  
Old 11-17-2009, 04:52 PM
hoytedow's Avatar
hoytedow hoytedow is offline
Mad Scientist
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 1786 Posts: 2,985
Location: Dangerous Ground
Quote:
Originally Posted by safffff View Post
I have followed Willmer for 4 yrs. Apex is good to question. But is not the ultimate goal is to succeed in this project. No one including apex is willing to put up the testing dollars of constructing...but is this man of vision anything less than Orville Wright that had many aspect of flying incorrect. By creating one sub for a costumer is not a profit making adventure.....This thread should be dedicated to progressing this technology. forward.....I want a sub that that can take 50,000psi economically built...with the new concrete materials.... I suspect that people like apex want to stop his research....Willmer I'm in San Fransisco and would consider it a honor to help your new sub along with any labor help you need as I would have offered to the Wright brothers.

.
The Wright brothers didn't take their unproven design and sell it to some naive customer to break his neck with. First, they tested, tested, tested and didn't have a customer take the risk. When that hull fails, the customer will either be drowned or crushed by the implosion of the hull. Fish food either way. Never sell your prototype. It is for research, not profit.


...and that bugs me.
  #506  
Old 11-17-2009, 05:14 PM
MikeJohns MikeJohns is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 1623 Posts: 2,344
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by safffff View Post
I have followed Willmer for 4 yrs...............but is this man of vision anything less than Orville Wright................as I would have offered to the Wright brothers..
Consider that in this case “concrete” submarines have been researched developed and produced with success. Although with completely different construction for very good reason.

Wilfried still needs to say who the team of experts were that he apparently consulted, any one of them would have some serious questions to answer.





__________________
Mike Johns.
  #507  
Old 11-17-2009, 05:50 PM
safffff safffff is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: -23 Posts: 11
Location: California
Please show me the pictures of a completed sub that you have produced, that is better than what Wellmer has produced. End of story, thank you.

.
  #508  
Old 11-17-2009, 06:09 PM
apex1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Peers,
please,
only this one time.
Give me permission to say what I´m thinking!
Yeah? Ok then:

saffff you are a idiot
  #509  
Old 11-17-2009, 06:13 PM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,363
Location: Maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by safffff View Post
Please show me the pictures of a completed sub that you have produced, that is better than what Wellmer has produced. End of story, thank you.

.
MOROON, Wellmer didn't make or operate a submarine.
Please do not ask this stupid and absurde question. If you think it was a legitimate question you are a moroon without any doubt.
Now I have a question for you moroon: Who are you to post a question like that, what credential you have if I show you a picture?
How could you discern the capability of a submarine from a picture?
You can't moroon.
You are WellmerSafffffff a fraud.
  #510  
Old 11-17-2009, 06:48 PM
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 777 Posts: 1,546
Location: Victoria BC Canada
saffffff,

" End of story, thank you."

No, thank you. Good-bye.

-Tom
Closed Thread



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Concrete Canoe! (Help) Luciano Boat Design 13 06-13-2009 05:44 PM
Concrete bilge corrosion RCardozo Metal Boat Building 3 04-09-2007 09:27 PM
Ballast- concrete beam Ari Wooden Boat Building and Restoration 12 02-20-2007 08:37 PM
Barge Out of Concrete? Hotel Lima Boat Design 21 12-12-2006 03:27 PM
Design of a concrete canoe fmechini Software 1 02-21-2002 12:52 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net