Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:21 PM
Boysie Boysie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rep: 10 Posts: 14
Location: New Zealand
Chine width

Hi Folks,
I have the plans of a 19 ft monohedron planing hull that is 5ft 0ins across the chines midships reducing to 4ft 10ins at the transom, beam 7ft 6ins (so there was quite a lot of flare in the sides) that I built in 1963 for pulling rock lobster pots. The boat was very successful, handling rough water particlularly well.
I have moved to a location where we have to cross a shallow bar and have decided to build a boat to the same plan but increasing the width across the chines at the transom to 5ft 0ins. A friend (not a designer) tells me that if I do this then the boat will be hard to steer in a following sea. He says that in his experience some narrowing across the chines at the stern (albeit small) is essential. Is he right?
Regards, Boysie.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2008, 03:51 PM
Nojjan Nojjan is offline
All thumbs...
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 30 Posts: 107
Location: North Europe
Your friend is correct to some extent. Making such a change to an existing hull will make it slightly more resistant to directional change no matter what course and slightly more sensitive in following seas (more bow steering). Looking at many modern hulls this old rule is forgotten but the directional thrust of an outboard or sterndrive is sufficient to yaw the boat for good steering and maintaining good course stability.

At the end though I wonder if your 2" change will provide the other benefit your are looking for. /N
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-17-2008, 04:45 AM
Pericles's Avatar
Pericles Pericles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 1222 Posts: 1,680
Location: The heights of High Wycombe, not too far from River Thames
Boysie,

Tom Lathrop posts here and his site address your questions.

http://www.bluejacketboats.com/

In addition, Jacques Mertens has designed craft which work well. See DE 23, DE 25, LB 26 and others, such as Classic 19 Express and Pilot 19. Explore the site.

http://www.bateau.com/categories.php?cat=29

Welcome to the forum.

Pericles
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-18-2008, 03:48 AM
Boysie Boysie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rep: 10 Posts: 14
Location: New Zealand
Thanks for the information Nojjan and .Pericles. I'll revert to the original chine. Propulsion was a locally manufactured primitive jet drive no longer in production, powered by an automobile engine. Presumably the weight of the inboard engine placed at approx the centre of buoyancy would have assisted with stability. Although a bit lively at anchor (but not unpleasantly so) the boat performed very well in head and following seas.
Regards, Boysie.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tapered chine width Nojjan Boat Design 18 08-06-2007 05:24 AM
boat width grp.boat Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 1 06-14-2006 07:30 AM
Square chine/round chine messabout Boat Design 6 03-15-2006 10:49 PM
Cruising Cat Width Inquisitor Boat Design 69 11-13-2005 01:31 PM
Picking the right deep V width for kids Richard Petersen Boat Design 0 12-16-2004 09:58 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2013 Boat Design Net