can some one show me how to design tall ship, something from like a 1700's navy fleet

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by druidking, Nov 2, 2008.

  1. terhohalme
    Joined: Jun 2003
    Posts: 512
    Likes: 40, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 506
    Location: Kotka, Finland

    terhohalme BEng Boat Technology

    Ask (google) Fredrik af Chapman
     
  2. PAR
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 19,126
    Likes: 498, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 3967
    Location: Eustis, FL

    PAR Yacht Designer/Builder

    His "Treatise on Shipbuilding" was a notable piece of work for it's day, but what does that have to do with attempting to design a late 18th century war ship? Granted Chapman's work could be an interesting read for hobby naval historians like me, but it's way too in depth for the novice.

    No offense intended you, George. I'm in a unique position to know quite a lot more then the average person about these frigates.
     
  3. George S
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 32
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Washington DC

    George S The old fellow

    A look alike frigate about 4 feet Long

    Par: I am wrestling with the idea of a "look alike" historic ship (brig really). The ships of Steel, Chapman & Hutchinson Ltd. of Palo Alto look great but are too heavy for my old back. So I am looking for scale plans of "old ships" to build a semi-scale replica about 4 feet long on the water line But I want the ready to sail weight to be under 30 lbs. SC&H have elected to use long low profile lead keels with some inside ballast too. You can see the weights on their website <modelsailingships> I am wrestling with the math of using deep fin keels with the lead concentrated in a bulb.
    Actually, the current build is a modified Mayflower with a lwl of 36 inches.
    I plan to increase draft by 1 1/2 inches and then test fins of various depths with various weights of bulb. Not very scientific, but my math analysis is not that good.
    I hope to finish the model by spring and then sail it with the grandchildren.
     
  4. PAR
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 19,126
    Likes: 498, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 3967
    Location: Eustis, FL

    PAR Yacht Designer/Builder

    I have a scale model of USS Constitution, about 30" LWL, floating in a display tank in my living room. It took about 9 pounds of fishing weights to bring her down to her lines. It's surprisingly stable, considering her top hamper, but the ballast/displacement ratio is probably 500:1 in my light weight plastic model. The weights are inside, arranged on the centerline.

    The other half wondered out loud about my maturity as a person, as I played with my boat in the bath tub, trying to get her to balance, fore and aft and side to side. She expected I'd have out grown the need to play with toy boats in the bath tub at my age (I was in my late 40's at the time), but I assured her I hadn't and to leave me play with my boat, thank you very much.

    As far as sailing this model, it likely could carry it's lower courses in light air, but not it's royals or topgallant's, without risk of capsize. Actually it's mains and tops would over press her in all but a very light wind. Under mains only, she'd be okay. With a fin and moving the ballast a few inches below the hull she could carry her "fighting sails", but you'd need even more depth for a "full press", including stuntsails.

    Model building has it's unique requirements, as you know. It's usually best to have a "above the LWL" model, with a functional under belly, for reasonable sailing performance.
     
  5. jehardiman
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,773
    Likes: 1,167, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2040
    Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA

    jehardiman Senior Member

    For late 18th century naval vessels get a copy of The History of the American Sailing Navy by Howard Chapelle. Lines plans, sparing and sail plans, frame and space, guns and carrages, boats...it has it all in one place. As well as the "who's better" arguments that showed up above.

    For merchant ships, I'm not sure of a good book for the late 18th century, but The China Tea Clippers is a very good book for a slightly later period (c1840-1860).

    Edit:

    BTW, for what it is worth, Chapman is about the only author on "ship design", as opposed to "ship operation" throughout this period. Most Naval Architecture was (and to a certian extent still is) a guild system with apprentices learning from masters and everybody learning from (after the fact) obvious failures. Because soo much money is tied up in the construction of a ship, it was very difficult to get someone to buy a ship that was significantly apart for other, successful, ships. Development proceeded very slowly during the 16th-18th centuries and it wasn't until the mid 19th century that the "scientific" development of the art began and you see an explosion of texts on the subject.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2009

  6. George S
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 32
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Washington DC

    George S The old fellow

    Thanks, I thought that there might be a "secret " formula. I will just keep stumbling along.
    I nearly bought a similar model of the Constitution for our local grandchild (12 years old) but all he is only interested in computer war games.
    Ships and Science ... ISBN 10-0-262-06259-3 by L. D. Ferreiro might interest you (but it is long and over my head a lot of the time.) George
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.