Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Boat Design
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-05-2002, 11:50 PM
8knots 8knots is offline
A little on the slow side
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rep: 349 Posts: 266
Location: Wasilla Alaska
Bad Backyard Builders

Hey all......
I found this web-site in the new issue of PMM. Not to knock all attempts at building or modyfying your own boat, But this kind of wild addition to the deckhouse is a little on the risky side for my tastes. I am sure we have all seen "Wonder boats" (wonder how they made it back alive) How about some pics or stories! This the place to learn from the mistakes we see (Or think we see). In the boats arund us in everyday life. 8Kts

http://www.el-may.com/photos/home%202.jpg
Attached Thumbnails
Bad Backyard Builders-danger.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2002, 10:17 AM
james_r james_r is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 44
Location: Toronto, Canada
Never mind the deckhouse, what about the location of the radar antenna? It sent shivers down my spine. There are some excellent home-built/modified boats out there. This isn't one of them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-06-2002, 06:28 PM
Polarity Polarity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rep: 148 Posts: 480
Location: UK
Quote from the site
"The Surveyor's notes were:
The vessel is considered suitable for operation in her intended trade within Underwriter's Trading Warranty No. 3, and with extensions for 150 miles offshore West Coast North America."

150 miles offshore???
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2002, 09:06 AM
Matthew Matthew is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 40
Location: England
Pardon my ignorance, but whats wrong with the position of the radar antenna?
__________________
Mat Newland
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-07-2002, 09:28 AM
mmd's Avatar
mmd mmd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rep: 290 Posts: 378
Location: Bridgewater NS Canada
Matt, it is not good practice to have a source of focused electromagnetic radiation located at head level. Sorta like a microwave oven without a door.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-07-2002, 09:33 AM
Polarity Polarity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rep: 148 Posts: 480
Location: UK
"Microwaves are absorbed by living tissue and their energy is converted to heat that may easily damage some organs, particularly the eyes, which may develop cataracts. It has also been shown that long-term exposure to low levels of microwave radiation can induce a variety of physiological effects in small laboratory animals. The importance of these effects and their relevance to the case of human exposure are not yet fully understood. Microwaves may also interfere with cardiac pacemakers.

The maximum safe levels of exposure to microwaves are specified by the Australian Standard 2772 (1985).(1) Persons on or about the craft, other than personnel specifically involved in the installation or maintenance of the radar should not be exposed to average levels higher than 0.2 mW/cm2 or to peak levels exceeding 1 W/cm2.

calculations based on information supplied by the manufacturers and measurements carried out by this and other laboratories(2) indicate that at 1 metre from, and at the same height as the antenna, peak levels of approximately 0.5 W/cm2 may be encountered. The average intensity may be between 0.5 and 0.8 mW/cm2, when the antenna is stationary. The average intensity drops to safe levels (i.e. below 0.2 mW/cm2) at a distance of several metres from the antenna.

* The average exposure is reduced by a factor equal to the ratio between the beam width at the exposure distance, and the scan circumference at that distance (at short distances the beam width is equal to the antenna size). "

Would keep your coffee warm on a cold night.....

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-07-2002, 09:57 AM
james_r james_r is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 44
Location: Toronto, Canada
Thanks for answering guys. Sometimes in my zeal to be brief with my comments I'm a little too brief.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-07-2002, 10:10 AM
Portager's Avatar
Portager Portager is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rep: 322 Posts: 418
Location: Southern California
No one has pointed out the placement of the outriggers for the paravanes. The general rule of thumb is they should be aft of the center but forward of 2/3rds if the length. These appear to be too far aft to me.

Another faux pas, the two large propane tanks are sitting bare in the aft cockpit where any leaks will collect and seep into the lazerette. These should be in a sealed locker and vented overboard.

Cheers;
Mike Schooley
__________________
Designing "Portager" a transportable passagemaker
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-25-2002, 02:24 PM
jools jools is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 3
Location: UK
I think the wild additions and sceptical safety of this boat is one thing but no ones mentioned that fact it looks like a bus!

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-05-2002, 09:09 AM
Steve Gray Steve Gray is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 10 Posts: 22
Location: Weymouth, UK
When it grows up it wants to be a Mississippi riverboat! Bet there's a big paddle-wheel aft. And those aren't outriggers; they're pubescent smokestacks. ;O)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-30-2010, 08:49 AM
dskira dskira is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rep: 1305 Posts: 1,363
Location: Maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by jools View Post
I think the wild additions and sceptical safety of this boat is one thing but no ones mentioned that fact it looks like a bus!

You are right, but go to a marina and look at brand new production yacht the same size.
They look like a wedding cake and each deck designed by someone else. So perhaps a bus is not so bad Painted yellow, can be attractive
Daniel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-30-2010, 01:11 PM
messabout messabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 696 Posts: 1,232
Location: Lakeland Fl USA
I ain't shipping out on that thing... Though not nearly as bad as the now famous backyard designer who did not believe that a NA was necessary. There is a long thread about that fiasco somewhere in this forum.


Oops!... I said, above, "not nearly as bad". That could be compared to a statement like "not as severely drowned", or maybe "slightly pregnant".
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-31-2010, 09:39 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 432 Posts: 1,358
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
Titanic built by professionals
Noah's ark built by amateurs
PS You notice that since God now has GPS he can target floods....
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
catamarans boats with bad sea gandalff Powerboats 17 03-09-2005 06:11 PM
Yacht Builders Yachting Boatbuilding 0 01-30-2005 07:20 PM
Yacht Builders Yachting Services & Employment 0 01-30-2005 07:19 PM
How European and U.S.A boat builders purchase the equipments for the boats? genuineyachts Marketplace 2 01-12-2005 12:29 AM
Wood Cold Molded Epoxy/Composite Builders winap Wooden Boat Building and Restoration 6 07-23-2004 08:02 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net