| ||||
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| aditional beam concern We just piked up a columbia 50 in a unfinished condition she is aprox 15% wider than stock I am comfortable with the widening structuraly though am concerned about aditional inverted stability any one have a opinion or other isues involved? She needs a new deck any way so bringing her back to stock wouldent be to much more efort at this point. Thank you in advance Scott Drake (562) 225 5197 mindsailingscott@aol.com |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Scott, Originally these boats, due to being narrow and deep in comparison to a modern hull, were pretty unstable upside-down. The additional beam will change this characteristic, but not much. Original beam was 12', plus 15% = 13.8' max beam/ cube root of displacement/64 equals capsizing screening number, if lower than 2, she is a cruiser. At 1.74 you are in cruiser territory Tad |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Florida Sharpie Length to beam ratio | Florida_mariner | Wooden Boat Building and Restoration | 6 | 04-19-2005 07:47 PM |
| Beam to length ratio? | Danielsan | Boat Design | 28 | 03-05-2005 01:14 PM |
| Beam vs. Ride | Blue heron | Boat Design | 8 | 01-24-2005 03:22 PM |
| Hull Waterline Length to Beam | longngone | Boat Design | 12 | 10-22-2004 12:37 PM |
| Overall beam of Tris vs Cats | patrik111 | Boat Design | 2 | 09-28-2003 01:05 PM |