| ||||
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Please explain "built down hull" While looking around for the "perfect boat" I came across the term "built down hull" in reference to lobster type hulls. No one offered an explanation of this term, and I guess in New England it is common knowledge, but not here in Texas! What does this mean, and what advantage(s) does it have over "conventional" hulls? Thanks.
__________________ Craig Cavanaugh Silver King Custom Marine No shoes, no shirt, no problem! |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| In a "built-down" hull the planking forms the "tuck" in the transition from the hull to the skeg. Internally this forms a well that the shaft runs and allows a short bore-hole through the sternpost. In a "skeg" hull, the planking follows the hull buttock lines in a flowing line to the transom, and the skeg is built up of deadwoods and bolted through the keel. This is easier to build, but requires a long shaft bore-hole. There are very vocal camps on both sides of the question of which method is best. Please be aware that I grew up in "built-down" country, so I may be biased. The pro - con arguments (assuming traditional plank-on-frame wooden construction) run like this: a built-down hull is stronger a built-down hull is more prone to garboard rot a skeg hull is faster because of less wetted surface a skeg hull is prone to becoming loose due to working of the keelbolts a skeg hull is easier to build a built-down hull is more seaworthy and on and on and on .... [IMG]X skeg profile.bmp[/IMG] |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Thanks mmd, more info to chew on......... ![]()
__________________ Craig Cavanaugh Silver King Custom Marine No shoes, no shirt, no problem! |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| This is the illustration I tried to load. Built-down is on the left, skeg-built on the right. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can Someone explain Electolysis please? | Matthew | Boat Design | 4 | 09-23-2002 12:07 PM |