Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Construction > Boatbuilding
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2003, 01:19 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 256
Location: Tasmania, Australia
inboard engine-outboardor propeller?

Is it possible to have an inboard engine, with a demountable or tilting outboard, electric or hydrolic propeller unit with wires or hoses leading forward to the engine? So that when away from land the boat does not suffer from added resistance etc., and there is no hole in the hull. Is this realistic?

Cheers dionysis
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2003, 10:56 AM
George99 George99 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 10 Posts: 2
Location: Switzerland
What is the size of the boat?
What is the engine HP needed?
What is the use of the boat? Pleasure? Ocean going?

Give me some hints to come up with a practical solution

George99
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2003, 03:52 PM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1397 Posts: 7,216
Location: Milwaukee, WI
It's easy. Either use an electric motor connected to a generator, or a hydraulic motor connected to a pump.
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-29-2003, 04:02 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 256
Location: Tasmania, Australia
here are some particulars

Hi George99 and Gonzo.

The boat will be about 60 ft lwl, and 20 tons, ocean going sloop. For a proper auxiliary, tables say about 100 hp, but I think this is too much.

I think that something of the order of 30 to 50 hp would be enough for an emergency, and for docking in close quarters.

I know this is rather small, but I hate the thought of such a big motor, with all it's attendant maintenance. What do you say?

I agree, your suggestion Gonzo, is the way to go. Air cooled too.

cheers and thanks for the replies. dionysis.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-29-2003, 09:54 AM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1397 Posts: 7,216
Location: Milwaukee, WI
30 to 50 seems OK. Bow thrusters on boats that size are about 10-15 HP.
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-29-2003, 02:29 PM
ongolo ongolo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 15 Posts: 26
Location: namibia
why not aircooled?

Hi Dionis,

why not put an air cooled diesel in. There is no other maintenance than oil changes, and whether you have an air colled diesel of 30 or 100hp its still only an oil change,

I have a 4 cyl 912 deutz in my 55ft schooner with 22t displacement by a narrow beam of only 12 ft.

the engine can dev a max of 80 hp at 3000rpm but only 65 at 2300 rpm and about 50 at 1800rpm which I will normaly run at.

regards ongolo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-30-2003, 04:59 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 256
Location: Tasmania, Australia
yes...

Air cooled is the way to go ongolo, and I am glad that you agree gonzo, that say 50 hp is allright in this sze boat.

Bow thrusters? hmm... seems more trouble than they are worth. Why are they important?

Check out this new kind of propeller:

hubner-braun propeller

What do you think?

cheers, dionysis
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-30-2003, 10:40 AM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1397 Posts: 7,216
Location: Milwaukee, WI
In the US where marinas are overcrowded, there is little space to maneuver. Even twin screw boats can have a hard time docking. In these conditions, a bow thruster may be necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-01-2003, 04:33 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 256
Location: Tasmania, Australia
hmm..

This is well worth considering. Thanks for the pointer gonzo.

dionysis
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-01-2003, 09:22 AM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1397 Posts: 7,216
Location: Milwaukee, WI
That propeller looks interesting. Do they give efficiency comparisons to standard propellers? I had a 34' catamaran with an outboard in a central pod. It worked, somewhat, to move the boat sideways. The lateral movemant produces huge eddies that make the propeller cavitate.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-01-2003, 09:52 AM
dionysis dionysis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 44 Posts: 256
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Info on website says same efficiencies as a normal propeller.

Cavitation going sideways makes sense, since there would be a lot of resistance, just as there would be a lot of resistance initially when moving off from a mooring say.

I like the idea because you can get retractable ones.

By the way this kind of propeller, according to the website, is used on tug boats, so would be ideal for going sideways, really good for manouvering in confined situations.

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-01-2003, 12:57 PM
Doug Carlson Doug Carlson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rep: 10 Posts: 113
Location: Arizona
Its a very interesting system. I wonder about durability and maintenance in that it appears to be significantly more complex than a fixed blade, folding, or even a variable pitch (feathering) propellor. Pitch is altered on every rotation. Helicopter complexity.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-01-2003, 01:37 PM
yipster's Avatar
yipster yipster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 1027 Posts: 3,269
Location: netherlands
Quote:
Its a very interesting system. I wonder about durability and maintenance in that it appears to be significantly more complex than a fixed blade, folding, or even a variable pitch (feathering) propellor. Pitch is altered on every rotation. Helicopter complexity.
ánd it leaves a hole in the hull...
i posted a webcam pic of myself on the pc here with a RC heli hanging over my head but toke it off again, think for a boat prop i agree with Doug, still its a interesting idea!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-01-2003, 07:50 PM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 1397 Posts: 7,216
Location: Milwaukee, WI
One concern is that it has not protection from impact.
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-01-2003, 10:42 PM
SailDesign's Avatar
SailDesign SailDesign is offline
Old Phart! Stay upwind..
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 637 Posts: 1,720
Location: Jamestown, RI, USA
These "props". like the Voith-Schneiders used on tugs, are much slower-turning than "real" props, so the impact thing is not such a problem. Believe me, if they were painful to deal with, or un-reliable in debris-filled water, they would not be put on harbour tugs ;-))
Yes, they are more complex, though.
Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Replacing an outboard engine with an inboard engine boere Sailboats 1 09-16-2005 08:49 AM
re-instating inboard using a bike engine crash Powerboats 10 04-19-2005 06:55 PM
FOR SALE: MerCruiser 260hp gas inboard engine lockhughes Marketplace 3 04-14-2005 11:08 PM
gearboxes and potential bobber Boat Design 38 04-03-2005 12:22 PM
Replacing an outboard engine with an inboard engine boere Boatbuilding 0 06-23-2003 05:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net