Bill Fish 6
12-13-2004, 09:36 AM
Hi all...
Been toying around with a pet project, which involves a boat of a certain size and carrying capacity....and most likely this project will never get past the "thinkin bout it" stage....but it is an interesting mental exercise (at least for me) when you are trying to juggle conflicting requirents by trying various technological/engineering combinations...
Anyhow, what I want in my virtual boat is the ability to go about 2 times hull speed with relatively good fuel economy, which seems to me to be a bit too fast for displacement/semidisplacement, and too slow for reasonably efficient planing. By the way, does anyone have an example graph showing miles per gallon versus speed for a theorectical/typical boat (preferably for a 1 to 2 ton)?. I ask because i am wondering how much efficiency you "get back" once you start planing since while you are guzzling fuel at a high rate, you are also travel a darn bit faster as well.
Well, back to the point of this post. I've always had the impression that hydrofoils came about because some folks wanted to go REALLY fast in boats. Even faster than those planing maniacs (and perhaps with better fuel efficiency as well).
And it just occurred to me, would hydrofoils make ANY sense for low speed boats (ie 1.5 to 2.5 hull speed)? Obviously the foils would be ALOT bigger than those on the high speed jobs. But would such a low speed hydrofoil, with say 10 to 30 percent of the weight of the boat still being supported by purely bouyancy forces (to help with stability) be more efficient than a "normal" boat at such speeds? Of course even if so, the foils would surely have some disadvantages as well (which might or might not be acceptable).
Doest this make any sense at all? Has anyone seen a low speed hydrofoil? Or even a technical discussion as to why it would make no sense at all?
take care
Blll
Been toying around with a pet project, which involves a boat of a certain size and carrying capacity....and most likely this project will never get past the "thinkin bout it" stage....but it is an interesting mental exercise (at least for me) when you are trying to juggle conflicting requirents by trying various technological/engineering combinations...
Anyhow, what I want in my virtual boat is the ability to go about 2 times hull speed with relatively good fuel economy, which seems to me to be a bit too fast for displacement/semidisplacement, and too slow for reasonably efficient planing. By the way, does anyone have an example graph showing miles per gallon versus speed for a theorectical/typical boat (preferably for a 1 to 2 ton)?. I ask because i am wondering how much efficiency you "get back" once you start planing since while you are guzzling fuel at a high rate, you are also travel a darn bit faster as well.
Well, back to the point of this post. I've always had the impression that hydrofoils came about because some folks wanted to go REALLY fast in boats. Even faster than those planing maniacs (and perhaps with better fuel efficiency as well).
And it just occurred to me, would hydrofoils make ANY sense for low speed boats (ie 1.5 to 2.5 hull speed)? Obviously the foils would be ALOT bigger than those on the high speed jobs. But would such a low speed hydrofoil, with say 10 to 30 percent of the weight of the boat still being supported by purely bouyancy forces (to help with stability) be more efficient than a "normal" boat at such speeds? Of course even if so, the foils would surely have some disadvantages as well (which might or might not be acceptable).
Doest this make any sense at all? Has anyone seen a low speed hydrofoil? Or even a technical discussion as to why it would make no sense at all?
take care
Blll